18/09/2018
I wrote this for another group, but as it turned into a mini novel I thought it would be worth sharing it here too.
I've been a judge on many photo competitions and I am the PhotoWatchDog, a service that no one has ever tried to supply (one that lobbies photo competitions to produce fair competitions for entrants and to give away freely my time and energy to photo competition organisers providing them with fair terms and conditions)
OK lets get one thing straight. Photography is subjective. Even the most experienced and creative photographers will disagree on how an image is scored, or judged. Competitions rely on judges, and if you, the entrant think that when your images aren't received as well as you, your friends, your mentors think you should have scored, been awarded, then attacking the system or the judges in general is in my view unacceptable.
I've been a great advocate of putting some form of defence system within the terms and conditions to protect judges.
Is it that necessary ? After 24 years of judging anything from APPA, and AIPP state awards, to Luminous Awards, Creative Asia Awards, Epson Pano Awards and the Moran Contemporary Photographic Prize; I've received a fair amount of thanks but an inordinate amount of negative/hostile feedback. On several occasions that feedback has transgressed from slightly hostile to actual death threats, where the police have been called into knock on the door of the upset interstate entrant.
Like many I'm asked to contribute my time because of my experience within the industry.
I've also been a state chair of jurors and national deputy chair of jurors, which relies on selecting judges and putting together teams of people with varying degrees of experience, balancing gender, and opposing and wide range of views.
Recently I put my own images into National APPA's after I'd entered them at State, they didnt do as well as I'd hope, but I probably had unrealistic goals and expectations. Yes I complained to some of my nearest and dearest, but after a couple of days, I had to remind myself of what I tell everyone else; judging an image is not a mathematical equation. It's not something you can rely on it being judged the same from one panel to the other. There is no system in the world that can do that.
So when you enter a competition, you accept the outcome of the judging - it says that in all the terms and conditions of entry. And these days it also says that you shouldnt go on to social media and bag the judging out. We've all done it at some point, myself included. But here's why we shouldn't do it, and that is because it relies on people to judge it.
If we slam the judging (after it has followed an acceptable and described process prior to entry), then more and more people who accept, (normally at their own cost) to judge a competition, will begin to decline those invitations.
I assure you that it is happening. I am deeply concerned that more and more people are saying no thanks to judging because of social media posts. I won't call them attacks, because I'm sure that many of you here wouldn't think that they are, but when you've been part of a judging panel and then the social media world lights up because Fred has a much better picture (but didn't enter it - not to self, you can't win it if you're not in it), or Felicity didn't get the score she was assured from her friends that she deserved, that feels like an attack.
Sit down all day for four to five days, judging images approximately one every minute, for ten hours a day, with a short time off every 45-60 minutes. Not every one of your calls is going to be correct. If your image is judged after a series of uninspiring images, then you have a luck on your side. If your image follows a series of amazing images that all score golds, then yours just might be dismissed fairly quickly. The good news is that most systems rely on many different arrangements of multiple judges.
And that's when the "feedback" comes into play. Now this is a very personal view, but after a print has been judged with a score is the absolute worst time to gain feedback. It's when the olympic ice dancer couple have completed their dance, it's subjectively viewed and scored by a panel of judges. Some judges see the best part and score if highly and some see the faults and score it low. Their score is announced. Hoorah or tears. Then a judge is selected that is sitting somewhere in the middle, ie they were not decisive, they played safe, and they're the ones who are asked to add a comment. Why? Who is interested in their view I'd ask. I want to hear from the judges who saw the faults, or ask why it didnt appeal to them. But the horse has bolted, they've gone, they're no longer there. Comments and feedback is required prior to entering these things. Ice Dancers like almost anyone have coaches or trainers.
My past career was as a Principal Ballet Dancer with a leading company that performed all over the world. Applause at the end of the show was one way of knowing that you'd done a good job. If there was none, then you would hear a deafening silence. If it was the last chance to perform that role, I would received zero feedback from my Artistic Director, Ballet Master, Coaches, Trainers or Partners, there was no point! Their job was to coach, mentor me, extract the best out of me. If you're entering competitions for feedback you're doing it for the wrong thing and you're approaching it from the wrong way. Get that feedback before you enter.
Yes I cant argue with how many people want feedback from judging, but just because a lot of people who don't know how a system works asks for something doesn't mean that it's the right thing to do. Personally I try and educate as many as I can about how to go about entering into competitions
I've coached many photographers for both their work and entering competitions and I've explained to them things that are important -
READ THE RULES,
READ THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS,
READ THE BRIEF or CATEGORY DESCRIPTION
I've mentored totally new photographers to very very experienced, and also taking that range, I've mentored or coached in one on one situations and those people have as first time entrants not just scored highly but taken out the main titles.
And very importantly, understand how the image will be judged; what the lighting conditions will be or will it be judged digitally, on calibrated high end monitors (so if you're viewing yours on a cheap monitor or on an calibrated screen).
There is a wealth of new competitions on the market and most are run on a commercial basis, they almost have to be. There are very few that are not. But most still rely on a large amount of volunteers. So what some will see as "such a small thing", others, including me see that as a fairly large issue. And I'm as welcome to that honest view as the original author is of those words. BTW, I'm not a n**i and by disagreeing with you, I'm being as honest as I would be face to face. ( What I won't ever do is use the term N**i, that is without debate highly offensive, and I would ask that people please decline from using it)
That's my view based as an entrant, as a judge and as a photographer who chooses to shoot to push myself regardless of how long I've been doing it for.