08/25/2026
In the latest edition of my LinkedIn newsletter, Education and Leadership, I examine background knowledge not merely as a cognitive resource, but as a curriculum and equity question.
If comprehension depends on prior knowledge, we must ask:
Whose knowledge is recognized?
Who has had opportunities to acquire the knowledge a text assumes?
When does an assessment mistake unfamiliarity for inability?
Drawing on current literacy scholarship and my experience overseeing academic systems across more than 500 schools, I argue that education carries a dual responsibility: to recognize the cultural and linguistic knowledge learners bring while systematically expanding every child’s intellectual world.
A curriculum can be knowledge-rich without being culturally narrow. It can be culturally sustaining without being intellectually thin.
I would especially value the perspectives of literacy researchers, curriculum scholars, educators, and policymakers:
How can schools build shared knowledge without turning the curriculum into a cultural entrance examination?
Why Background Knowledge Is Both a Cognitive Resource and an Equity Question Two students can read the same words accurately and understand entirely different texts. One recognizes the topic, vocabulary, relationships, and unstated assumptions.