Group Fitness Help

Group Fitness Help The official group of AUFP Inc.

The questions we should be asking:❓ Why is employer-governed AUSactive “Limited” funded primarily through mandatory annu...
05/09/2026

The questions we should be asking:

❓ Why is employer-governed AUSactive “Limited” funded primarily through mandatory annual registration fees paid by fitness professionals?

❓ If employment contracts require professionals to maintain AUSactive registration, why do the people funding the organisation have so little control over its governance?

❓ Why is AUSTSWIM, a charity and dominant swim teacher registrar, funded through fees paid by swim teachers who have no direct representation on its board?

❓ Why can private registrars collect mandatory employment-related fees when evidence that registration improves professional standards or public safety remains unclear?

❓ Why does the Fair Work Act protect workers against certain compulsory payments associated with “industrial organisations”, while mandatory payments to “industry associations” appear to fall outside those protections?

Yet Victoria’s Labor Government is seeking to restrict state-based unions that actually represent workers.

Not-for-profit does not mean exempt from accountability.

Workers should not be forced to fund organisations they do not control. ❌

AUFP is providing an update regarding recent regulatory action involving Huntlee Fitness and Urth Fitness, both owned by...
30/06/2026

AUFP is providing an update regarding recent regulatory action involving Huntlee Fitness and Urth Fitness, both owned by the Rosekelly family.

SafeWork NSW has issued written regulator responses to both facilities after AUFP raised concerns about instructors being placed on the timetable without the required qualifications. SafeWork NSW advised each workplace of possible WHS concerns, reminded them of their legal obligations, and directed them to review the situation and take necessary steps to manage any risks identified. SafeWork NSW also noted it may conduct follow‑up visits.

In September 2024, instructors at Urth Fitness were given only four hours of in‑house “training” before being offered reformer Pilates classes. AUFP understands this training was delivered by a staff member who held no Pilates qualification and was not an RTO. At least two instructors declined the classes, stating they did not feel competent or safe teaching reformer with such limited preparation.

By comparison, industry‑standard training delivered by Studio Pilates requires 64 hours of structured education plus supervised shadowing — a training gap of approximately 60 hours.

AUFP raised these concerns with the Director of Operations in March 2026. Later that same day, the Group Fitness Coordinator stepped down from their role.

AUFP attempted to resolve the matter constructively, and had the concerns been addressed appropriately, the issue could have been resolved internally without regulator involvement.

AUFP also raised concerns about independent contractor arrangements, including sham‑contracting indicators and superannuation guarantee compliance. AUFP understands that SG contributions and retroactive amounts remain unpaid.

AUFP’s position remains clear: Instructors must hold the required qualifications before being timetabled, and fitness operators must comply with WHS, employment, contractor, and superannuation obligations.

We will continue monitoring the matter as SafeWork NSW progresses its follow‑up actions.

AUFP has provided all relevant information to eight Newcastle media outlets and has also contacted the Pilates Association Australia (PAA) to discuss potential collaboration on strengthening safety and training standards across the sector.

Address

Sydney, NSW

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Group Fitness Help posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The School

Send a message to Group Fitness Help:

Shortcuts

Share