09/08/2026
MEDIA RELEASE
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Ilitha Labantu Calls for Urgent Action to End Violence Against Women as South Africa Marks 70 Years Since the Historic Women’s March
As South Africa marks National Women’s Day and 70 years since the historic Women’s March of 1956, Ilitha Labantu calls for urgent and sustained action to end violence against women.
National Women’s Day must be more than an occasion to remember the women who marched to the Union Buildings. It must compel us to confront the reality that, 70 years later, women and children continue to experience violence and insecurity in their homes, communities and places where they should be able to expect safety and protection.
The continued scale of violence against women demands a response that is urgent, sustained and measurable. Yet the continued absence of reliable national disaggregated data on crimes against women and children raises serious concerns about our ability to fully understand the crisis, determine where interventions are required, allocate resources effectively, measure whether interventions are achieving their intended outcomes and hold institutions accountable.
Data is not simply a statistical exercise. It is fundamental to understanding the nature and extent of a crisis and determining whether the systems established to address it are actually working. If government is serious about eradicating violence against women and children, the country must be able to consistently account for that violence.
How do we properly understand the scale of the crisis if we cannot consistently account for the women and children affected by it? How do we determine whether interventions are working? How do we know whether resources are reaching those who need them most? And how do we hold institutions accountable when the information required to measure their performance is not consistently available?
South Africa has demonstrated its ability to collect, analyse and publish complex information during periods of national emergency. The absence of a consistently updated national picture of violence against women and children therefore raises serious questions about the priority being given to this crisis.
This concern becomes even more significant when considered alongside the laws, policies and structures established to address gender-based violence and femicide. South Africa has a legislative and policy framework intended to protect women and children and strengthen the national response to GBVF. The National Strategic Plan on GBVF was adopted in 2020, while the National Council on Gender-Based Violence and Femicide Act was signed into law in 2024.
The question is therefore not simply whether frameworks exist. The question is whether they are functioning as intended.
Are our legislative frameworks being effectively implemented? Are the institutions responsible for protecting women and children adequately resourced and equipped? Are survivors receiving the protection and support they require? Are cases of gender-based violence being effectively investigated and prosecuted? Are perpetrators being held accountable? And where systems fail, are we taking the necessary steps to understand why they failed and prevent those failures from recurring?
The delays in establishing the National Council on Gender-Based Violence and Femicide further demonstrate the gap that can exist between government commitments and implementation. The establishment of a statutory coordinating body was first committed to following the 2018 Presidential Summit on Gender-Based Violence and Femicide. Yet it took years for the legislative process to be completed and for the process of appointing the Council’s leadership to conclude.
This timeline is difficult to reconcile with repeated declarations that gender-based violence and femicide constitute a national crisis requiring urgent action.
For years, South Africa has seen summits, declarations, strategies, legislative processes and announcements. We have heard repeated commitments to strengthening the national response to GBVF. The question that must now be asked is whether these commitments have translated into the urgency, political will and institutional action that this crisis demands.
There is a growing concern that government can become more focused on demonstrating that something is being done than on ensuring that what is being done is effectively implemented and produces the intended outcomes.
The establishment of structures, adoption of legislation and announcement of initiatives cannot become ends in themselves. They must result in functioning institutions, adequate resources, effective coordination, meaningful accountability and measurable improvements in the lives of women and children.
What does it say about our national response when structures intended to address one of the country’s most persistent crises take years to become operational? What does it say when women and children continue to experience violence while the urgency reflected in government commitments is not always matched by the pace of implementation? For Ilitha Labantu, this is fundamentally a question of political will.
If government genuinely recognises GBVF as one of the most serious challenges facing South Africa, then that seriousness must be reflected in the speed, resources and determination with which commitments are implemented.
Women and children cannot be protected by declarations alone. They cannot be protected by legislation that takes years to translate into functioning institutions. They cannot be protected by structures that exist without the resources and capacity required to fulfil their mandates.
The country does not need government to simply appear to be doing something about GBVF. We need government to demonstrate, through action, that it is serious about ending the violence.
This must also extend to the criminal justice system. Survivors should not have to navigate systems that further compound the trauma they have already experienced. Police services must have the skills, resources and capacity to respond appropriately to cases of GBV and femicide. Investigations must be effectively conducted, evidence properly handled, cases appropriately prepared and prosecuted, and perpetrators held accountable.
Where cases fail to progress or do not result in justice, the reasons for those failures must be properly interrogated. Where there are shortcomings in investigations, prosecution, forensic services or the treatment of survivors, corrective action must follow.
Accountability cannot end when a crime is reported. It must extend throughout the criminal justice process.
At the same time, addressing violence against women and children cannot be limited to what happens after a woman or child has been killed, r***d or assaulted. A meaningful response must extend beyond reactionary approaches.
Prevention must begin before violence occurs through sustained work with children, young people, families, schools and communities to challenge attitudes, behaviours and social norms that perpetuate violence and discrimination against women and girls.
This requires accessible psychosocial support, effective referral pathways, comprehensive support for survivors and coordinated action between government, civil society, law enforcement, schools and communities.
Government must also recognise the critical role played by civil society organisations working on the frontline. These organisations provide essential services to survivors and communities, conduct prevention programmes, strengthen referral systems and respond to violence where it occurs.
They require sustainable and adequate support to continue this work. Responsibility for addressing this crisis cannot be shifted to civil society while government structures remain inadequately implemented or resourced.
We must also reflect on the kind of activism and collective action required to address this crisis.
Activism cannot be confined to commemorative periods, public statements or moments of national outrage. It requires sustained community mobilisation, challenging harmful attitudes and behaviours, supporting survivors, strengthening prevention and demanding accountability from institutions.
It also requires ensuring that the voices and experiences of women and communities affected by violence remain central to the national response.
We must therefore ask ourselves, as a country, whether we are doing everything within our power to eradicate this scourge.
This is not simply a question of policy. It is not simply a question of administration. It is a moral question.
At what point do we acknowledge that the continued prevalence of violence against women and girls represents a failure of our collective responsibility to protect their dignity, their rights and their lives?
We cannot hope to make meaningful progress as a nation while violence against women and girls persists. We cannot speak meaningfully about equality, development, justice and social progress while women and girls continue to experience violence in their homes, communities and public spaces, while survivors encounter barriers to justice and while perpetrators are not consistently held accountable.
The advancement of women is inseparable from the advancement of society. The safety, dignity and rights of women and girls must therefore be regarded as fundamental measures of the progress we are making as a country.
It is within this context that the 70th anniversary of the Women’s March of 1956 takes on particular significance.
The women who marched to the Union Buildings in 1956 stood against the pass laws and the broader system of apartheid that sought to oppress, control and discriminate against the majority of South Africans. Their struggle was not limited to the rights of women. It formed part of the broader struggle against a system that denied people justice, equality, dignity and freedom.
The women of 1956 laid a foundation upon which subsequent generations have had a responsibility to build.
Seventy years later, we have a democratic Constitution and legislative frameworks that recognise and protect rights that women of 1956 were denied. We have made significant progress. But progress cannot be measured only by what is contained in our Constitution, legislation and policy documents.
We must also look at what women and girls experience in their everyday lives.
Are they safe? Are their rights protected? Are survivors receiving justice? Are perpetrators being held accountable? Are our institutions functioning as they should? Are we doing everything within our power to ensure that violence against women and children is eradicated?
These are questions that cannot only be asked during National Women’s Day or Women’s Month. They must inform our national response every day of the year.
For Ilitha Labantu, honouring the women of 1956 means recognising the responsibility that their legacy places on us. It means continuing to challenge violence against women and children, advocating for stronger prevention and protection mechanisms, supporting survivors and demanding accountability from institutions entrusted with their safety and access to justice.
It means ensuring that the rights and dignity of women and girls do not remain confined to legislation and policy, but are translated into meaningful action and lived reality.
Ilitha Labantu therefore calls on government to move beyond declarations, commitments and structures that merely create the appearance of action. South Africa needs urgent implementation, adequate resourcing, reliable disaggregated data, functioning institutions, effective access to justice, accountability and sustained prevention interventions.
The women of 1956 laid a foundation for justice, equality and freedom. Seventy years later, our responsibility is to build on that foundation by ensuring that women and girls are not only afforded rights in writing, but are able to live with dignity, safety and freedom from violence.
For Media Enquiries:
Siyabulela Monakali
Communications Manager
Ilitha Labantu
[email protected]