10/19/2025
WOW, WOW 🥰 AND WOW! THANK YOU 🙏 JENNIFER SPIVEY FOLEY, SISTER OF SCOTT SPIVEY SHARED OUR POST. GOD IS WORKING!
…………………………….
If you don’t know Scott’s story, it’s nothing short of horrific. The Spivey case in South Carolina has been in the headlines for months and also featured on podcasts. The case involved the fatal shooting of 33-year-old Scott Spivey on September 9, 2023, and has become a focal point of allegations of systemic MISCONDUCT and CORRUPTION within local law enforcement and the criminal justice system. While the shooting itself was initially deemed justified under South Carolina’s “Stand Your Ground” law by the Attorney General’s office, a litany of investigative failures and revelations of apparent police malfeasance have raised serious questions about the INTEGRITY of the process.
- Initial Investigation: The Horry County Police Department (HCPD) initially portrayed Spivey as the suspect and Weldon Boyd and Bradley Williams as victims, yet internal documents reportedly listed Spivey as the victim and Boyd/Williams as suspects
- Legal Outcome: The South Carolina Attorney General’s office declined to prosecute, citing the “Stand Your Ground” law and a lack of evidence to overturn that determination
- Civil Lawsuit: Spivey’s family filed a wrongful death lawsuit in June 2024. During civil discovery, critical lapses emerged, including MISSING BODY CAMERA FOOTAGE, uncollected physical evidence, and breaks in the chain of custody. Sound familiar?
- Reopening the Case: In May 2025, Horry County officials requested the South Carolina State Law Enforcement Division (SLED) reinvestigate, leading to a broader probe into potential police corruption.
Allegations of Corruption and Misconduct
- Missing Evidence and Mishandling: Civil discovery uncovered procedural failures—missing body-camera footage, evidence not collected, and chain-of-custody issues—that undermined the integrity of the initial investigation
- Officer Misconduct: HCPD deputy chief Brandon Strickland resigned in March 2025 following an internal affairs investigation, and officer Paul Vascovi was fired after body-cam video showed him holding a note instructing Boyd to “act like a victim” at the scene
- Alleged Cover-Up: There is public and media speculation that friends of the shooters within the police department influenced the investigation. Recordings allegedly captured Strickland implying that Boyd was “taken care of,” though he could claim these statements were bravado. The lead investigator showed little interest in resolving inconsistencies in Boyd’s account, further raising suspicions of bias
- SLED Corruption Probe: SLED’s investigation is not focused on the shooting itself, but on potential criminal misconduct by HCPD officers during the aftermath. The outcome of this probe could have legal consequences for both the officers and possibly the shooters, depending on the findings
- Public and Media Scrutiny: The case has drawn significant media attention, with outlets highlighting contradictions in official narratives and questioning the fairness of the investigation
Current Status
As of October 2025, the S.C. Attorney General’s office has now asked an independent prosecutor to review the entire case, including the initial decision not to prosecute under “Stand Your Ground,” and to revisit prosecutorial decisions if new evidence warrants it. The SLED corruption probe into HCPD remains ongoing, with its findings potentially altering the legal landscape of the case.
Conclusion
The Scott Spivey case is emblematic of broader concerns about police accountability, evidence handling, and the potential for favoritism or corruption in high-profile criminal investigations in South Carolina. While the original legal determination was based on the state’s self-defense statute, the cascading revelations of investigative lapses and apparent officer misconduct have fueled public skepticism and legal challenges, with the outcome now hinging on parallel criminal and civil proceedings
