09/04/2026
Each September, the Academic subcommittee of the school board reviews the annual senior exit survey. The 2026 survey will be reviewed on Tuesday, 9/8, at 6:30pm. The monthly school board meeting starts at 7:30. Both meetings are open to the public in the Administration Building, off Book Road. Agendas and the survey are linked below in comments.
September 2nd Academic Committee:
2024-2025 L-S High School Senior Survey Results and Graduation Data:
Dr. Westphal and the academic committee reviewed the results of the Senior Exit Survey, which had 188 participants:https://resources.finalsite.net/images/v1756402610/lspioneersorg/ljwcc9zenmb2dxcddgil/2025_09_02_AcademicCommittee_Agenda_Website.pdf
She began by reviewing the question types broadly and said no red flags stood out. Kids feel its a safe place and enjoy all activities and electives
Mrs. Herr asked about the results of the four questions on school counselors' knowledge around career planning, social issues, and degree of care. Dr. Westphal stated that the work with the counselors has improved. Last year there was a long-term sub for the full year; the HS is back to three full-time counselors in the High School this year.
Mrs. Knowles asked when the survey is taken: In the spring April/May during dissemination of graduation info.
Parido noticed the question, "How many years have you attended Lampeter-Strasburg High School?" Would be nice to know how long they've been in the district to see how the retention rate is. Wording around Chromebook usage is limited: asked whether Chromebooks are used often in class, etc., vs. "Do we like Chromebooks and are they the best tools?"
Mr. Parido identified the variety in responses for the question, "The L-S Drug Testing Policy affected my decision making on using illegal substances." Disagree and Strongly Disagree responses don't provide insight as to why or how the policy affects decisions (i.e., "I would never use drugs, so the policy wasn't a deterrent" vs. "the policy wasn't a deterrent, and I used drugs").
Mrs. Steinbacher brought attention to 20.2% of students who responded with Disagree or Strongly Disagree to the statement, "Students of various backgrounds (race, economic status, ethnicity, gender, s*xuality, etc.) were respected and accepted at L-S High School." She asked how to best move forward with this information. Mrs. Herr asked how it changes class to class, which Dr. Westphal will look into. Mr. Parido asked for a 2-3 year trend.
Mrs. Steinbacher asked what can be done to improve this? How do we use this to grow?
Dr. Westphal said she would go back to Dr. Feeney and his team and impact the program within the HS building.
Dr. Peart said, "What is the purpose of the question and how are they interpreting it? Clearly we don't have 20% of all of those groups [ethnic minorities and LGBT] - if you put all of those together that is not 20% of our student population, it is much smaller. So if you have individuals that are outside of that group saying that it is a large problem... Our minority population is minimal, so... how are they interpreting that, and what Dr. Feeney does is he looks at the trends and shares with staff what was reported."
[Editorial: Stats aren't public for the '25 senior class but the published district minority population is 20%. LGBT population is unknown.]
Dr. Peart explained the drug testing question was added because board at the time wanted to add it as a "tool in the tool box." Some kids in the past reported staying away from drugs so they could participate as athletes, marching band, etc.
For the statement, "Bullying was not a significant problem for me during my time at L-SHS", 13.8% disagreed, indicating bullying affected those respondents personally.
Dr. Peart said L-S only had one confirmed report of bullying last year that was reported to the state. Policy defines bullying, and 90% of students can't correctly define it.
Mrs. Steinbacher acknowledged the bullying threshold is high, but returned back to the 20% of students who experienced or observed disrespect and lack of acceptance based on "different" backgrounds.
Mrs. Herr recommended to keep in mind that a few kids will always mark Disagree for everything because they're wired that way.
Mr. Mccomsey said perception is a big part of results because definition is fluid between bullying and not bullying
Switching topics, Mrs. Staley said it was interesting that positive behaviors were recognized and encouraged, amount of disagree/strongly disagree. Are the positive behavior incentives the right ones?
Mrs. Knowles, back on the topic of respect and acceptance: Do we ask students this at any point before senior year? Answer: no.
Mrs. Steinbacher: It would be interesting to start with 9th grade and see how answers change or not.
Mr. Parido asked to look at multi-year trends. Also take at subset of these questions and follow a cohort of students of 4 years.
---
IU13's MOU's for Title 1 and Title 2 program for non-public students. Mr. Parido verified with Dr. Westphal that no terms are changing. No further comments.
---
Compass Mark's Catch your Breath va**ng program for 7th graders at MM:
Third year of use, we pay half the cost ($640) and the rest is funded by the Lancaster County Drug and Alcohol Commission. Mrs. Herr asked whether 7th grade is early enough to make students aware. Dr. Smecker has a 5th grade program that addresses va**ng at Hans Herr.
---
Committee review of the following Policies...
103: Discrimination/Title IX Sexual Harassment Affecting Students,
103.1: Nondiscrimination - Qualified Students with Disabilities, and
104: Discrimination/Title IX Sexual Harassment Affecting Staff
Policies are derived from recommendations from PA School Board Association. Dr. Westphal provided an overview of small word changes and added definitions.
Mr. Welk said the policy is a deep read and should be broken out into smaller policies.
Mrs. Knowles sought clarification on differences between 104 (staff) vs. 103 (students).
Mr. Parido inquired whether there's a way to more clearly delineate the policies to make it easier for employees to navigate and interpret (not for action at the moment).
---
With Dr. Westphal new in her role as Assistant Superintendent, Mr. Parido explained that the Academic Committee doesn't have a set schedule and is an opportunity for deeper dives into district academic topics, good or bad. Mrs. Knowles said she likes time to hear from student groups (spelling bee, FFA, etc.) about activities.
The meeting adjourned at 7:03pm (33 minutes).