M. A. on Capitol Hill-Catholic University Politics Dept.

The Politics Dept at Catholic offers MA degrees with classes held on Capitol Hill. Contact Dr. Diana Rich @ 202-319-6224 or see http://capitolhill.cua.edu

We offer two exceptional off-campus programs leading to a Master of Arts degree in either International Affairs (MAIA), or in Congressional and Presidential Studies (CAPS). Each program is affordable and designed for working professionals as well as other graduate students. Our classes are held in the evening near Capitol Hill, Washington DC. For more information from a real person contact Dr. Diana Rich, Director, at 202-319-6224; or visit the web site: http://capitolhill.cua.edu

m.wsj.net 09/29/2019

In case the Noonan article cannot be opened from the previous post, here is the text.

Every time I imagine Elizabeth Warren debating Donald Trump, I picture him rumbling onto the stage like a big white bear—roaring “Grrr grrrr,” towering over her, paws flailing, claws extended. She’ll stand there looking up at him in the lights, and you’ll wonder if she’s trembling, cowering, because clearly she’s about to be crushed. And then she’ll take a brisk step forward and punch him hard and sharp in the kidney. And he’ll howl—“Aarrrrggg!”—because he’s surprised and it hurts and he assumed he’d easily chase her around the stage.

She’ll say, “Mr. President, I know everyone’s supposed to be afraid of you and your rough ways, but I don’t find you so tough. And I’m not afraid of you.” (Transcript: “Applause, cheers.”) Then she’ll call him soft, corrupt, incompetent—a phony martyr who doesn’t respect his own supporters enough to fake respectability.

He’ll call her a left-wing nut who’ll ruin the economy, destroy capitalism, kill our greatness, steal our private health insurance.

We’ll be off. And no one will know where it’s going.

That is my impeachment thought: Nobody knows where this is going. The politically obsessed may think they do, but something wild and unpredictable has been let loose. The charges are serious and credible. But America is as divided as it was in 2016, America is still in play, and it’s all up for grabs.

Everything, the entire outcome, will depend on public opinion.

The charge is that the American president went to the leader of Ukraine and invited him to take part in the 2020 presidential election by investigating one of the president’s likely competitors. Mr. Trump might have added pressure by delaying U.S. aid.

What is immediately striking is that no one who has spoken in defense of the president, including his spokesmen, has said these words: “Donald Trump would never do that!” Or, “That would be unlike him!” That will be the president’s problem as public opinion develops: everyone knows he would do it, everyone knows it is like him. There’s no mystique of goodness to be destroyed.

If everything depends on public opinion then a lot depends on how the House comports itself. Will the Democrats be sober, steady, fair-minded? Or will they be disorganized divas who play to their base and win over no one else? Are they capable of rising to the moment?

The guess here is that articles of impeachment will be drawn, presented and pass the House.

Impeachment is a grave constitutional and governmental act, but it is also a political one that requires public support. Speaker Nancy Pelosi has calculated that the case is strong and the people will come along. She wouldn’t have moved forward if she didn’t think she was going to win. The president is wrong when he says she’s finally bowed to the mad progressives of her party, who are so colorfully belligerent, who last summer pushed to impeach William Barr and last week wanted to impeach Brett Kavanaugh. Mrs. Pelosi is an attentive vote-counter and a practical pol. I think she’s moving now because she thinks she got him and the jig is up.

At an off-the-record meeting in New York Monday, the night before she announced the impeachment push, she looked like someone whose old hesitation was gone. In its place was the joy of the hunt.

As for the Senate, the understandable and previously reliable common wisdom was that Republicans there will keep the needed 67 votes for conviction from materializing. That’s probably still likely, but it’s no sure thing. Tuesday the Senate voted unanimously for the whistleblower’s complaint to be made public. (On Thursday it was.) Senators didn’t say, “This is just another partisan witch hunt. Grrr grrr.” Why not? Because the charges were serious and they couldn’t refuse to ask for more information. Because they wanted to signal to the White House that they couldn’t accept the idea that aid to Ukraine could have been held up over something like this. Because they had to assume more bad information was coming. And because they’re four years into the Trump era and are tired of having to excuse and explain everything the president does that is surprising, illogical, unprofessional, dubious.

Most of them wouldn’t miss him if he were gone. They’d happily peel off if public opinion back home seemed to shift.

Among Trump supporters right now, the Ukraine story would look like a Washington-centric phony drama—more partisan nonsense, business as usual, ignore it. But if the story gets bad, if it comes to be thought of as a real national-security question, as the whistleblower charged in his report, they will pay attention and care.

So much depends on who’s called to testify and what they say and how ugly a picture they paint.

Wholly anecdotal but perhaps significant, I heard this week from two separate Trump supporters, one in the past passionate, the other whose support was always softer, who shared their dismay at the Ukraine story. Both said these words: “Maybe Pence wouldn’t be so bad.” They were exhausted by the drama and wrongness. Why not the man with the soft white hair?

In the end, in purely practical political terms, the one person who will be hurt by this story will be Joe Biden. Every telling of this story necessitates pointing out that Mr. Biden’s son Hunter had cozy financial relationships with other countries, including Ukraine. It’s real swamp stuff. It looks bad, say the former vice president’s friends. No, it is bad.

It is infuriating that members of America’s leadership class so often show themselves to the world as self-enriching. As a nation we spent the 20th century presenting ourselves to the world as a truly moral leader, a self sacrificing country, one to be looked up to. In the 21st century our political figures and their families too often look like scrounging grifters—Americans with connections who can be hired, who leverage connections to fame for profit. There’s a fairly constant air of soft corruption, of an easy, seamy reality of big-power back scratching.

It makes America look bad. It makes us look weak and craven, like we can be bought.

There should be something called the Class Act. If you have any class, you don’t profit financially from a relative in power in the world’s greatest democracy. You don’t embarrass your country that way. Because, you know, you have class. You’re lucky to be from a respected family. A president or vice president might say, “It’s unfair to make my child sacrifice a deal because of what his father does!” Actually, no one asked you to ask for power; no one told you to want it. If you get it, it’s an honor. Do your job. Yes, your family should sacrifice, as should you.

The story of Hunter Biden and his business adventures isn’t new, and yet sometimes stories come alive in new ways. This one will probably come into focus for a while and be emblematic of the swamp.

Joe Biden probably thought it was old news, already dissected and dismissed. But it’s back, and will hit him like a kidney punch.

Peggy Noonan

Peggy Noonan is an opinion columnist at the Wall Street Journal where her column, Declarations, has run since 2000.

She was awarded the Pulitzer Prize for Commentary in 2017. A political analyst for NBC News, she is the author of nine books on American politics, history and culture, from her most recent, “The Time of Our Lives,” to her first, “What I Saw at the Revolution.” She is one of ten historians and writers who contributed essays on the American presidency for the book, “Character Above All.” Noonan was a special assistant and speechwriter for President Ronald Reagan. In 2010 she was given the Award for Media Excellence by the living recipients of the Congressional Medal of Honor; the following year she was chosen as Columnist of the Year by The Week. She has been a fellow at Harvard University’s Institute of Politics, and has taught in the history department at Yale University.

Before entering the Reagan White House, Noonan was a producer and writer at CBS News in New York, and an adjunct professor of Journalism at New York University. She was born in Brooklyn, New York and grew up there, in Massapequa Park, Long Island, and in Rutherford, New Jersey. She is a graduate of Fairleigh Dickinson University in Rutherford. She lives in New York City. In November, 2016 she was named one of the city's Literary Lions by the New York Public Library.

m.wsj.net

Opinion | Democrats Set a Bear Trap 09/29/2019

Peggy Noonan weighs in on the impeachment of Donald Trump and ramifications for the Democrats.

Opinion | Democrats Set a Bear Trap Pelosi thinks she has Trump’s number. She may be right, though Biden won’t escape this scandal.

The Museum Is the Refugee’s Home 08/18/2019

Washington's own Phillips Gallery and its special refugee exhibition, "The Warmth of Other Suns" is highlighted in this NYT essay.

The Museum Is the Refugee’s Home Without exiles and émigrés there is no modern culture. A new show in Washington maps a century of art and displacement.

05/20/2019

Commencement 2019 was held on Saturday May 18, 2019. We salute eleven graduate students who earned a Master of Arts in International Affairs.

Degrees awarded in January 2019:
Abdulelah Alajlan
Bariq Alassaf
Mansour Alharbi
Saud Binmaummar
Max-Olivier Bros
Mary Lastowka
Frank Tedeschi

Degrees warded in May 2019:
Lakia Kent-Allen
Maria Martinez
Sean Sullivan
Lauren Werling

Well done!!

04/24/2019

Summer session begins the week of May 13 - a good way to earn three credits. Still time to enroll in CPOL 661, Media:Impact on Domestic and International Politics - offered by Prof Bua, the class meets on Wed evenings at the Hall of States. Also time to enroll in CPOL 510, Power and Money: Issues in Political Economy - offered by Prof Quirk as an on-line class. Enroll in both!!.

How the Supreme Court’s Decision on the Census Could Alter American Politics 04/24/2019

The Supreme Court is reviewing whether 2020 census respondents should say whether they are citizens. Political maps based only on the citizen population could tilt in favor of Republicans.

This NYT article is an excellent primer on the census and its impact on apportionment.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/23/us/noncitizens-census-political-maps.html

How the Supreme Court’s Decision on the Census Could Alter American Politics The Supreme Court is reviewing whether 2020 census respondents should say whether they are citizens. Political maps based only on the citizen population could tilt in favor of Republicans.

03/31/2019

Time to register for summer session classes. The MAIA is offering two incredible courses:

CPOL 510: Power and Money, an on-line course regarding issues in political economy. May 13 to June 24. Prof Jim Quirk

CPOL 661: Media: Impact on International and Domestic Politics. May 15 - July 31 - Wednesdays. Prof J. C. Bua

03/12/2019

From the WSJ editor at large:
Will the Issue of Character be Trump's Undoing?

By Gerard Baker
March 8, 2019 1:39 p.m. ET
We are supposedly days away from the conclusion of Robert Mueller’s investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election. No one knows whether Mr. Mueller will allege criminal conduct by the president or any (more) of his close associates. Yet we can be reasonably confident that the report will not present a flattering portrait of the 45th president. But if there’s no crime, his supporters will say, “Who cares?”

It may be intended rhetorically, but it’s a serious question. Does it matter if the president did bad things as long as he’s not a criminal? Should presidential character count?

It’s an age-old topic whose saliency ebbs and flows with changing private and public mores and the nation’s shifting political priorities. In the modern age it seems to have been completely subsumed into the cant of hyper-partisanship. Republicans denounced Bill Clinton as a sleazy huckster whose behavior spoke to a larger disqualifying character flaw. But they dismiss Donald Trump’s transgressions as peccadilloes that shouldn’t be allowed to detract from a record of achievement. Hillary Clinton fans, who now say that a woman who accuses a powerful man of sexual impropriety must be believed, spent a good deal of time trashing the reputations of her husband’s many accusers.

In some ways we have come full circle when it comes to character. Once, the true timber of a president’s personality was concealed by a kind of omertà between the media and the politicians, so the moral flaws of an FDR or a JFK were never made public. After a few decades in which candidates and public officials were then subjected to an excruciating examination of potentially disqualifying character traits, we now seem back to an age when a president can be a moral monster because there will always be enough partisan support to sustain him.

Yet there are surely still issues of honesty, probity, truthfulness—qualities that determine the ability of the chief executive to channel and represent the core virtues of American society. Recent history tells us that there have been important moments when character has counted.

Could character be the Democrats’ trump card in 2020?
Jimmy Carter won in 1976 in large part because of his perceived character. After the calamity of Watergate and what we came to learn of Richard Nixon’s behavior, Carter’s artful self-presentation as the straight guy who “will not lie to you” was probably the difference that helped him to defeat Gerald Ford.

Less widely recognized is that in 2000, George W. Bush pitched a similar case. The country may not have wanted President Clinton impeached, but by 2000 it was sick of the endless ta**ry spool of the Clinton years. I covered Bush in that campaign and remember vividly how he often ended his political rallies: “When I put my hand on the Bible I will swear not only to uphold the Constitution of the United States but the honor and integrity of the office of president.”

It was a subtle and welcome promise to many voters that, whatever else he might do in the Oval Office, it would not involve blue dresses and ci**rs. The impression he gave of decent character played a critical part in his narrow victory.

Could character be the Democrats’ trump card in 2020? The economy is strong, jobs are plentiful, the nation is at peace—at least overseas. President Trump is doing some unorthodox but not necessarily ineffective things in foreign policy. His approval ratings are roughly where those of his predecessors were at this stage before they went on to win re-election.

Democratic strategy to unseat him seems based on a twin track of criminal investigation and ideological warfare. But might not a better tack for them simply be to focus on character?

Polls and anecdotal evidence suggest that even many of those who support President Trump are tired of his offenses against simple decency. There’s a weariness with the daily verbal journey through the sewers of political rhetoric; the vanity, the incidental connection with truthfulness; and the gathering evidence of the cascading cataracts of cupidity that have coursed through the man’s career.

Perhaps Democrats are themselves nervous about making character an issue, given the abundant ethical frailties on their own side. But is it not at least possible that their most effective message might be a simple promise to restore good character to the office?

How many colleges and universities operate in D.C.? 02/04/2019

CUA's Capitol Hill programs in International Affairs and Congressional and Presidential Studies still the best bang for the buck - prestigious university with very competitive tuition.

How many colleges and universities operate in D.C.? More than you think.

Want your school to be the top-listed School/college in Washington D.C.?

Click here to claim your Sponsored Listing.

Location

Telephone

Address


620 Michigan Avenue NE
Washington D.C., DC
20064
Other Colleges & Universities in Washington D.C. (show all)
Corcoran School of the Arts and Design at the George Washington University Corcoran School of the Arts and Design at the George Washington University
500 17th Street NW
Washington D.C., 20006

Visit us virtually! See events, talks and performances online at go.gwu.edu/atcorcoran.

UBIS University of Business Innovation and Sustainability UBIS University of Business Innovation and Sustainability
1401 H Street NW Suite 100
Washington D.C., 20005

One of the BEST Swiss private Business University which proposes BBA, MBA and DBA program online and

Georgetown University Georgetown University
3700 O Street NW
Washington D.C., 20057

Georgetown University is the oldest and largest Catholic and Jesuit university in America.

The Graduate School of Political Management The Graduate School of Political Management
805 21st Street NW
Washington D.C., 20052

www.gspm.gwu.edu; www.twitter.com/gspmgwu; http://politicalmanagementmasters.online.gwu.edu/; http://publicrelationsmasters.online.gwu.edu/

Georgetown Club of Metropolitan Washington, D.C. Georgetown Club of Metropolitan Washington, D.C.
P. O. Box 18126
Washington D.C., 20036

The Georgetown Club of Metro DC is the flagship club of the Georgetown University Alumni Association.

Georgetown University Jewish Life Georgetown University Jewish Life
Georgetown University
Washington D.C., 20057

Georgetown Jewish Life --Because there is more way than one way to be GUish!

Semester in Washington Semester in Washington
Washington D.C.

A hands-on academic program for college students interested in politics. Take classes on applied pol

American University School of Professional & Extended Studies American University School of Professional & Extended Studies
4400 Massachusetts Avenue NW
Washington D.C., 20016

The School of Professional & Extended Studies/SPExS

American University Career Center American University Career Center
4400 Massachusetts Avenue NW/5th Floor Butler Pavilion
Washington D.C., 20016

The AU Career Center teaches students and alumni to develop career goals, decision-making skills, and job search strategies to manage their professional and academic pursuits.

Georgetown Alumni Georgetown Alumni
3604 O Street NW
Washington D.C., 20007

Georgetown Alumni on Facebook is your first stop in reconnecting with your alma mater and classmates on Facebook.

University of the Potomac University of the Potomac
1401 H Street NW, Ste 100
Washington D.C., 20005

University of the Potomac offers Associate, Bachelor, and Master degree programs that are in high dem

Howard University Department of Music Howard University Department of Music
2455 6th Street NW
Washington D.C., 20059