01/10/2022
Today's author highlight is written by BWWC 2022 planning committee member Elizabeth Parker. Read on to learn about Isabella Bird!
Isabella Lucy Bird, married name Bishop (1831-1904), was a famed traveler, author, and naturalist. She was one of the first women admitted to the Royal Geographical Society, and her publications include books chronicling her travels to regions as distant from her home country as Hawaii, China, Australia and New Zealand, and Tibet, to name a few. She visited every continent except Antarctica on her travels. According to biographers, Bird’s first overseas journey was undertaken in 1854 in an effort to improve her chronically ill health. She spent seven months in Canada and the United States on this trip, writing about her travels in “The Englishwoman in America” (published in 1856). Between 1856 and 1901, Bishop’s travels, many of them made without a companion, were undertaken for a variety of reasons: while her early journeys seemed to be largely for health, with exploration as an attendant benefit, and some were made for naturalistic observations or geographical reasons, her later trips emerged from her commitment to medical missions. Biographers note that this shift in focus to medical missions occurred after her husband, Dr. John Bishop, died in 1886. Characteristically, Bird did not go unprepared. She studied medicine at St. Mary’s Hospital in London before being consecrated for mission work by famed preacher Charles Haddon Spurgeon in 1888.
Bishop’s legacy is not uncomplicated. Although Bird is recognized as a pioneering figure for women’s involvement in exploration, naturalism, and travel-writing, and was known for her piety and compassion, both of which emerged from her serious faith commitments, she is also scrutinized for an innately Anglo-centric posture toward the people she encountered on her travels. Scholars like Laurence Williams and Steve Clark, however, note that her travelogues, particularly Unbeaten Tracks in Japan (1880), can be read as “simultaneously radical and conservative, sympathetic and denunciatory, staunchly imperial and anticipatory of postcolonial critique” (abstract). Bird, Williams and Clark argue, “is better understood less as a representative of British imperialism, than as an avatar of cosmopolitan awareness and utopian horizons already emergent in the later nineteenth century” (3).