10/09/2026
“Inefficient, unusable, frustrating and expensive.” That’s Ph.D. student Yael Eiger’s verdict on the technology incarcerated people have to use to stay connected with their communities — connections that are known to help them successfully reenter society after serving their sentences.
Eiger became interested in technologies used by and for incarcerated people while teaching in Washington state correctional facilities. Together with her advisor in the University of Washington Security and Privacy Research Lab, Allen School professor and alum Franziska Roesner (Ph.D., ‘14), Eiger co-authored a series of papers exploring people’s experiences with technology during and after their incarceration as well as technologies used for policing and post-release monitoring. What they found was an opaque system in which the incentives for those buying or developing the tech and those forced to use it (or have it used on them) are clearly misaligned — and in which some technologies, such as surveillance cameras, end up affecting everyone.
“We can increase incarcerated people’s security and privacy in a compassionate way that doesn’t have to be at odds with the goals of lowering crime, preventing crime and making society safer,” Eiger said.
Read a UW News Q&A with Eiger and Roesner about this work: https://www.washington.edu/news/2026/10/07/why-the-technology-used-by-incarcerated-people-is-inefficient-unusable-frustrating-and-expensive/
In three recent papers, UW researchers explore technologies used in prisons and to monitor people before incarceration and after release.