http://www.goldstandardaviation.com/

Gold Standard Aviation, 14933 NW 41st Avenue Suite 51-8, Opa-locka, FL (2026)

10/14/2026

You start picking up ice. Do you declare an emergency first, or take immediate action and declare afterward?

A military C-130 crew encountered ice accumulating on their aircraft’s airframe at 18,000 feet, despite having their anti-icing systems activated.

Recognizing the danger, the crew immediately initiated a descent in an attempt to escape the icing conditions and find more favorable conditions.

Seconds later, while descending through 16,400 feet, the crew advised ATC:

“Approach, we are in the descent to 12,000 for an anti-icing condition. We’re having some issues with our anti-icing equipment.”

The controller responded:

“You’re IFR, right? You descended on your own to 12,000? You just can’t do that without being assigned an altitude unless you declare an emergency! Are you in an emergency?”

Apparently, the crew determined that escaping the icing conditions was more urgent than requesting permission or formally declaring an emergency.

The crew explained: “Sir, we had an anti-ice system failure. We tried not to declare an emergency on you guys. Instead, we are telling you we are in the descent. It would have been an emergency if we didn’t descend. We could have had an engine flameout.”

The controller replied:

“Right, but I have an aircraft below you, and you might have descended into them without my coordination.”

Both sides had valid safety concerns. The crew was dealing with a potentially dangerous icing situation, while ATC was responsible for maintaining separation from other aircraft.

Fortunately, the C-130 landed safely at Memphis without further incident.

TAKEAWAY: FAR 91.3(b) states:

“In an in-flight emergency requiring immediate action, the pilot in command may deviate from any rule of this part to the extent required to meet that emergency.”

Additionally, the FAA Aeronautical Information Manual (AIM), § 6-1-1, recognizes the pilot’s authority to take necessary emergency action. When an emergency requires an immediate deviation from an ATC clearance, the pilot should notify ATC as soon as possible and obtain an amended clearance. Advance permission is not required when immediate action is necessary to address the emergency.

LESSON LEARNED:

When faced with an in-flight emergency requiring immediate action, fly the airplane first. Take the necessary steps to protect the aircraft and its occupants, then communicate your intentions to ATC as soon as practicable.

However, there is another important lesson here: Don’t hesitate to declare an emergency when circumstances warrant it.

The C-130 crew had a legitimate reason to take immediate action, but the controller also had a legitimate concern about conflicting traffic below.

If time permits, declare the emergency and coordinate your intentions before deviating from your clearance. If immediate action is required, take that action first and advise ATC as soon as possible.

The bottom line: You don’t need ATC’s permission to exercise emergency authority when immediate action is necessary. But ATC needs to know what you’re doing as soon as circumstances permit.

And above all, never allow a reluctance to declare an emergency to compromise the safety of your flight.

AVIATE — NAVIGATE — COMMUNICATE.

In that order.

Fly safe, friends! ✈️

10/11/2026

There is a big beautiful world just below those clouds

10/08/2026

WHY DO PILOTS PULL BACK WHEN THEY SHOULD BE PUSHING FORWARD?

It’s something we’ve thought about a lot when looking at stall/spin accidents.

The airplane starts losing altitude, and the pilot’s natural reaction is to pull back on the stick or yoke to keep it from descending. Unfortunately, when the wing is already stalled, that’s the worst thing you can do.

We saw a tragic example of this with Air France Flight 447 in 2009. Despite stall warnings, the pilot flying continued making nose-up inputs while the airplane remained stalled. The Captain entered the cockpit and immediately instructed the first officer to push the side-stick forward. By then it was too late. There were several factors involved in that accident, but the failure to reduce the angle of attack was critical.

We think a big part of the problem is human instinct. When you’re losing altitude, especially close to the ground, pushing the nose down is probably the last thing your brain wants you to do. Everything in you is telling you to pull up.

And that’s what concerns us about stall training. We teach pilots how to recognize and recover from stalls, but are we doing enough to prepare them for that unexpected moment when fear and instinct take over?

You can know the procedure perfectly and still react the wrong way when you’re startled.

You have to reduce the angle of attack to break the stall. Continuing to pull back isn’t going to save you. You must fly the airplane all the way to the ground.

I’d be interested in hearing from other pilots and instructors. Do you think we’re doing enough in training to overcome that instinct to pull instead of push?

Fly safe, friends ✈️

10/05/2026

Three Strikes Against This Pilot Lead to the Loss of Ten Lives

Last year in Alaska, a Cessna Caravan 208B entered moderate icing conditions at 6,000 feet AGL. According to NTSB investigators, conditions soon worsened as large supercooled liquid droplets (SLD) began impacting the airframe.

Although the Caravan was equipped with a TKS ice-protection system, it was not certified for flight in SLD conditions. Minutes later, the aircraft stalled, entered an unrecoverable spin, and crashed. All ten people on board perished.

Strike One: The pilot chose to operate an aircraft that was officially overweight for the forecast moderate icing conditions.

Strike Two: After first encountering icing, the pilot continued toward the destination rather than immediately turning back to escape the conditions.

Strike Three: No other action was taken to escape the icing as airspeed began to deteriorate due to ice accumulation. The NTSB also reported that when the stall warning activated, the pilot increased the aircraft’s angle of attack rather than decreasing it, leading to an aerodynamic stall and loss of control.

Takeaway: The FAA Pilot’s Handbook of Aeronautical Knowledge reminds us to avoid areas of precipitation when the outside air temperature (OAT) is at or below 0°C, as structural and induction icing can develop rapidly.

When potentially hazardous icing is encountered, recognize the warning signs early and take immediate action to exit the conditions. A 180-degree turn is usually the safest way out.

In aviation, waiting to see if conditions improve can quickly eliminate your options.

Fly safe, friends. ✈️

09/30/2026

Most of you are one flight away from making this basic checkride mistake.

Last month, a commercial pilot applicant was taxiing toward the runway hold-short point when his DPE asked, “Why are you using so much power on a flat taxiway?”

The applicant reflexively lifted his toes off the brakes and reduced power.

Minutes later, as the Piper accelerated toward rotation speed, the DPE again sensed inadvertent braking. After liftoff, he instructed the applicant to remain in the pattern and perform a short-field landing.

Seconds after touchdown, the DPE felt heavy braking, followed by a loud:

THUMP. THUMP. THUMP.

The left main tire had blown.

The applicant was issued a Notice of Disapproval for “riding the brakes”.

That same month, a Vietnam Airlines 787 began its takeoff roll in Munich, Germany. Accident investigators are examining whether inadvertent brake pressure by the pilot during the takeoff sequence contributed to the aircraft’s tail strike and subsequent collision with structures beyond the end of the runway. The aircraft sustained severe structural damage.

Takeaway: The FAA Airplane Flying Handbook warns pilots not to “ride the brakes.” During normal taxi, takeoff, and landing operations, slide your feet down the rudder pedals so your heels rest on the floor. When braking is needed, slide your feet up so your toes can apply brake pressure. Return your heels to the floor when braking is no longer necessary.

Riding the brakes is one of the more common mistakes DPEs and instructors observe—and it’s an easy habit to correct.

Heels on the floor. Toes off the brakes until you need them.

Fly safe, friends ✈️

09/27/2026

The Right and Wrong Way to Use the Word “Takeoff” When Communicating with ATC

The pilot of a Beechcraft Bonanza copied the latest ATIS and radioed Montgomery Ground at MYF for taxi:
“Montgomery Ground, Bonanza 9716R, taxi for takeoff with Echo.”

The ground controller replied:
“N16R, don’t use the word takeoff unless it’s in your clearance. Say ‘request taxi for IFR departure.’”

The confused pilot responded:
“I never knew that—good to learn something new.”

The controller then explained that after the Tenerife disaster decades ago, aviation phraseology was standardized to strictly control when the word takeoff is used.

Takeaway: To avoid misunderstandings, FAA Order 7110.65 states:

“Avoid the use of the word takeoff except to actually clear an aircraft for takeoff or to cancel a takeoff clearance.”

It also instructs controllers to avoid phraseology such as:
“After takeoff fly heading 180,”

and instead say:
“After departure fly heading 180.”

Pilots should follow the same practice when communicating with ATC.

Phrases to avoid:

• “Taxi for takeoff”
• “Ready for takeoff”
• “After takeoff fly heading 180”

The FAA cites numerous incidents where improper use of the word takeoff contributed to runway incursions. Replacing takeoff with departure helps reduce the risk of misunderstanding.

Preferred phases:

• “Request taxi for northwest departure”
• “Ready for northwest departure”
• “After departure fly heading 180”

Remember: Words matter when piloting airplanes.

Fly safe, friends. ✈️

09/18/2026

Three strikes against this CFI—and the result was fatal.

A Piper PA-28-140 departed KARB in Ann Arbor, Michigan, on an instructional flight. The aircraft had last been fueled two days earlier.

Approximately an hour and a half into the flight, the engine began running rough. The instructor immediately diverted back to KARB, advised ATC of the situation, and began troubleshooting.

Seconds later, the engine failed. ADS-B data indicates the instructor pitched for best glide. During the subsequent forced-landing attempt, the Piper stalled and entered a spin near a road. The instructor was killed, and his student was severely injured.

The NTSB identified a series of critical pilot errors:

Strike One: The instructor failed to properly manage the aircraft’s fuel supply by not periodically switching fuel tanks.

Strike Two: While troubleshooting the rough-running engine, the instructor or his student inadvertently moved the fuel selector to the neutral position rather than selecting the other fuel tank. This interrupted fuel flow to the engine.

Strike Three: During the forced-landing attempt, the instructor apparently realized the aircraft would not reach the road. While maneuvering at low altitude, he allowed the Piper to stall and enter a spin from which there was insufficient altitude to recover.

Takeaway: None of us truly knows how we will react the first time we face a serious in-flight emergency. Training exists so that when stress and adrenaline take over, we have procedures to fall back on.

Manage the airplane. Follow the checklist. Maintain airspeed. And above all, fly the airplane all the way to the ground.

Fly safe, friends. ✈️

09/12/2026

Did the Amazon B767 pilot try to salvage his unstable approach and landing because of poor training?

Think back to private pilot training and you will likely remember slips to fix a high final, floating half-way down the runway and porpoising because you were too fast, or slamming your Cessna on to the runway because you were too slow. Your instructor probably figured he would save you money and let you make those mistakes—keep going and you’ll figure it out on your own with a bit of coaching. Unfortunately, the money saved by not going-around or discontinuing those unstable approaches may have made you less safe.

There’s a mentality in some private pilot training that a student needs to “get it on the ground” no matter what.

Bounced the landing? Keep going.

Unstabilized approach? Try to save it.

Porpoising? Fight through it and get it down.

Too fast or too high? “Slip it in and you’ll learn from your mistakes.”

Yes, pilots absolutely learn by making mistakes. But there’s an important difference between allowing a student to make mistakes in a controlled environment and repeatedly teaching them—intentionally or unintentionally—to continue a bad approach or landing.

That’s where primacy matters.

What we learn first has a powerful tendency to stick. If a primary student repeatedly practices salvaging unstable approaches, recovering from bounced landings, or forcing an airplane onto the runway, we shouldn’t be surprised when “save the landing” becomes their default response later. We see this in the scores of piston and jet accidents resulting from unstable approaches and landings.

Maybe one of the most important habits we can teach from lesson one is much simpler:

If the approach isn’t right, GO AROUND.

A go-around isn’t a failed landing. It’s good aeronautical decision-making.

There is tremendous training value in recognizing an unstable approach early, adding power, cleaning up the airplane appropriately, and coming back around to try again. There’s also value in learning when a bounced landing can be safely recovered—and when the correct decision is immediately going around.

Students need to make mistakes. They need to experience imperfect approaches and imperfect landings. But the lesson shouldn’t always be, “Now find a way to get it on the ground.”

Sometimes the most valuable lesson is:

“This one isn’t working. Discontinue it.”

We talk constantly about judgment, risk management, and aeronautical decision-making. Those habits don’t suddenly appear after the checkride. We build them during primary training.

Teach the go-around with the same enthusiasm that you teach the landing.

Because primacy isn’t just about learning how to manipulate the controls.

It’s about learning what a pilot does when things aren’t going according to plan.

Fly safe, friends ✈️

09/11/2026

Why Multitasking Is a Bad Idea During Preflight

Just after liftoff from Wiley Post Airport (KPWA) this week, the pilot of a Beechcraft Duke B60 heard a loud bang and realized he had forgotten to remove the towbar, which was still attached to the nose gear.

The pilot notified the tower and requested a low approach over the runway so the aircraft could be evaluated for possible damage. A news helicopter pilot flew alongside the Duke and reported damage to the nose gear doors. Fortunately, the Duke landed uneventfully.

Takeaway: Aviation incident and accident reports are filled with examples in which distraction during preflight contributed to a problem. Common examples include towbars left attached, fuel caps left unsecured, and oil dipsticks not properly replaced.

The pattern is often the same: A pilot begins a task—attaching a towbar and moving the airplane, removing a fuel cap, or checking the oil—then gets distracted and moves on to something else before completing it.

The lesson is simple: Start a task, finish the task, then move on to the next one.

Don’t rely on your memory to come back and finish what you started. During preflight, one task at a time can prevent a small distraction from becoming a very big problem.

Fly safe, friends. ✈️

09/10/2026

Rookie move? Improperly pitching for airspeed may have contributed to the Amazon B767 crash this week.

The NTSB released CVR and FDR information yesterday indicating that the Boeing began what appeared to be a stabilized arrival at approximately 5,825 feet AGL.

About four minutes later, it appears the captain recognized that the aircraft was too fast to extend the flaps to 15 degrees and pitched up to reduce airspeed. Approximately 30 seconds later, while still pitching up, he called for flaps 20. The first officer warned that they were still too fast for that flap setting.

The captain then increased the nose-up pitch further in an apparent attempt to reduce airspeed. The FDR data released did not indicate any reduction in throttle position.

The airplane slowed, but the tradeoff was altitude: it climbed well above the desired glide path, making the approach unstable. After recognizing that the aircraft was high, the captain lowered the nose in an attempt to regain the glide path. That, in turn, allowed the airspeed to increase again.

The aircraft continued toward the runway at a very low pitch attitude and high airspeed while attempting to recover the desired flight path.

At the time of the NTSB release, the FDR information provided did not indicate the use of speed brakes or spoilers, so any conclusions about airspeed reducing devices should be made cautiously.

Takeaway: Do you always pitch the nose up when you need to slow down?

If so, that may not be the proper technique the FAA teaches.

Imagine you’re on final and realize you’re too fast for the next flap setting. You pitch up to slow down—but now you see all white on the VASI or find yourself climbing above the glide path.

You reduced your airspeed, but did you make the proper correction?

The FAA Airplane Flying Handbook teaches that when changing airspeed while maintaining the desired flight path, power and pitch must be coordinated. If you’re too fast, reducing power helps dissipate excess energy, while pitch is adjusted as necessary to maintain the desired flight path. This method does not apply in situations such as an unpowered glide or a full-power climb, where pitch is all you have.

If you’re too fast for flap extension while established on the proper approach path, reduce power as appropriate and coordinate pitch to maintain the glide path while allowing the airplane to decelerate. If the aircraft is equipped with approved speed brakes or spoilers, they may also be available to help manage excess energy in accordance with the aircraft’s procedures.

And most importantly: if the approach becomes unstable, follow your aircraft or operator’s stabilized-approach criteria and go around rather than trying to salvage an approach that is outside those limits.

Manage the energy—pitch AND power. Maintain the flight path. And don’t hesitate to go around.

Fly safe, friends. ✈️

Gold Standard Aviation

10/14/2026

10/11/2026

10/08/2026

10/05/2026

09/30/2026

09/27/2026

09/18/2026

09/12/2026

09/11/2026

09/10/2026

Address

Telephone

Website

Alerts

Contact The School

Shortcuts

Share

Category

Listing takedown request