09/18/2026
🐸 This I’m asking you: Should we use more VR and save the frogs?
Frog dissection has been a staple of science education for decades, and there’s a reason teachers continue to use it. Students get hands-on experience, practice lab skills, work together, and interact with real biological structures.
But VR can add something pretty valuable to that experience.
With a VR frog, students can:
🥽 Explore a 3D specimen from every angle
🔍 Zoom in and examine structures up close
🖐️ Practice identifying and manipulating structures before working with a real specimen
🔄 Make mistakes, reset, and try again
🔁 Repeat the experience as many times as they need
👀 See structures that can be difficult to visualize during a traditional dissection
And perhaps one of the biggest benefits? Every student gets a chance to explore.
VR gives students a low-risk space to build confidence, ask questions, and develop spatial understanding before, during, or even after a hands-on lab.
That doesn't have to mean choosing VR OR real frogs.
For many classrooms, it could be VR + hands-on learning, with each experience serving a different purpose.
So I'm curious, science teachers and professors:
🐸 Hands-on dissection
🥽 VR dissection
🔬 A combination of both?
How are you using VR to complement your lab experiences?
SyGlass