09/09/2026
Yesterday, our Clinic filed an emergency application to the U.S. Supreme Court requesting a stay of an unconstitutional state trial court order that prevents an Orthodox Jew from practicing his faith in the manner he believes it requires.
Consistent with his religious beliefs, Samuel Strulovitch brought a monetary dispute between two Jewish parties to a rabbinical court known as a beis din. He believes that his faith requires him to attempt to have the parties voluntarily agree to resolve the dispute under Jewish law.
But a New York court enjoined Strulovitch from seeking to resolve the dispute before the beis din. Worse still, the trial court has ordered Strulovitch to “take all steps necessary” to convince the beis din to withdraw a seruv—a religious censure—that the rabbinical judges issued on their own initiative and that Strulovitch believes the panel properly issued.
The application argues that the order squarely violates the First Amendment. Without the Supreme Court’s intervention, Strulovitch remains subject to an order that forbids him from practicing his faith in the manner he believes it requires and conscripts him to lobby leaders of his own religion to reverse a religious decision that he believes they got right.
Read more here:
Yesterday, Notre Dame Law School’s Lindsay and Matt Moroun Religious Liberty Clinic filed an emergency application to the U.S. Supreme Court. The ...