EdGungor.org

What if every breath we take is already a prayer?

Not metaphorically, but actually. Many have noted that the ancient name of God—YHWH—sounds like breathing when pronounced. Inhale, exhale. Life itself as invocation. Which would mean that before belief, before doctrine, before even awareness, we have always been calling on God.

That reframes everything.

It suggests that God is not waiting to be found at the end of a long spiritual journey, but has been as near as our lungs from our first breath. That salvation is not about finally managing to say the right words—but recognizing that we have always been calling on God’s name to save.

This fosters a bold hope: that the God who sustains every breath does not abandon us at the end of it. That whatever remains unfinished in us is not thrown into an abaondoned fire of hell, but healed. God never stops pursuing us--even on the other side of death (1 Pe 4:6).

“Love wins,” not as sentimentality, but as ontology. As the deepest truth about reality.

This resonates with Augustine’s confession: “You were with me when I was not with you.”

If that is true, then perhaps the spiritual life is less about finding God—and more about waking up to the One who has been breathing us all along.

Read the full article here:

https://edgungor.substack.com/p/hell-no-love-wins #

When Life Feels Stuck:
Trusting the Hidden Work of God

There are seasons when life feels immovable—when patterns repeat, circumstances harden, and the future seems closed off. In those places, it is easy to conclude that nothing will ever change, that we are confined to what is, with little hope for new possibilities.

That conclusion, however understandable, is not the whole truth.

Beneath the surface of what is present—beneath the visible, measurable, and immediately felt—there exists a vast region of possibility. Not merely abstract potential, but the quiet, active work of God unfolding beyond what we can sense.

Even when everything appears settled, life is not static. Beneath the surface, there is movement. New beginnings are not always announced; more often, they are assembled in silence. Relationships shift in unseen ways. Circumstances begin to loosen. What once seemed fixed starts, almost imperceptibly, to yield.

Scripture consistently gestures toward this hidden dimension of divine activity. “My Father is still working,” Jesus says in John 5:17. Not only in moments of dramatic intervention, but in the slow, underground work of renewal that rarely draws attention to itself.

Grace, in this sense, is quiet before it is visible.

Yet there is a cost to entering into what is becoming. Possibility is not accessed without passage. To move toward what is new, we must often wade through what is uncertain. Before new structures take shape, old structures loosen and must be abandoned.

That is where we hesitate.

Stepping from familiar ground into uncertainty feels like risk, even loss. It asks something of us—patience without assurances, movement without clarity, trust without guarantees. The spiritual life often leads us directly into this terrain.

The image of water is an ancient one in the life of faith. Water sustains us, but it can also threaten us. When we step into a body of water, what lies beneath is often obscured, even as the water carries us forward. To enter it requires a kind of surrender—not passive resignation, but active trust.

To learn to remain afloat when we cannot see the shore, to keep moving when the depth beneath us feels disorienting, is central to spiritual change.

Faith does not deny uncertainty. It does not pretend the waters are shallow when they are not. Rather, faith walks through uncertainty, trusting that God is present not only at the destination, but in the passage itself.

Hope is like this too. It is not fragile optimism or a refusal to face reality. It is a disciplined orientation of the soul. It keeps us from sinking when circumstances would otherwise overwhelm us. It allows us to say, with integrity, that what is visible is not always what is most real.

In pastoral work, one sees this pattern repeatedly. People arrive convinced their lives are stuck in place—an irreparable relationship, a burned-out vocation, an immovable addiction, a future that feels sealed shut. And yet, over time, things begin to shift. Not always dramatically. Not always quickly. But genuinely.

What seemed sealed starts to open.

What felt final is not the last word.

What appeared lifeless starts to awaken.

In reflection, people often realize the change was already underway long before it became visible. It was simply hidden—like seeds beneath soil.

So when life feels stuck, it is worth remembering that stillness at the surface does not mean absence of movement below.

Beneath what is, something is becoming.

This does not mean everything will turn out rosy. Much in life does not. But things can change for the better, even if not all at once. And the presence of uncertainty is not the absence of God. It may, in fact, be the very space in which God is most actively at work.

The invitation, then, is not to deny the depth of the water you’re in, but to trust that it can be navigated. To keep moving, even slowly. To resist the temptation to conclude that the present state is all there is.

Because it rarely is.

And more often than we realize, grace is already preparing its next surprise.

In Search of Eden: Why We Ache for More

“You have made us for yourself, O Lord, and our hearts are restless until they rest in you.” —-St. Augustine

Augustine’s famous line still lands with force because it names something most of us quietly feel every day.

There is an ache in us.

Sometimes it feels like boredom. Sometimes anxiety. Other times like a low-grade dissatisfaction we can’t quite explain. Even when we reach goals we thought would satisfy us, something in us still whispers: There must be more than this.

Augustine believed that ache was not accidental. Human beings, he argued, were made for something beyond this world. We were created from God and for God, and until we return to some kind of God-and-us thing, something in us remains unsettled. We feel like exiles trying to remember a homeland we’ve lost sight of.

The tragedy is not that we ache. The tragedy is that we often misread the ache.

Instead of recognizing it as spiritual hunger, we chase substitutes. Achievement. Romance. Approval. Consumption. Novelty. Escape. Even good things can become attempts to quiet a deeper longing underneath. But the ache keeps returning.

Bottom line: the soul can’t thrive on substitutes.

The Ache Is Not the Problem

What if the restlessness that drives so much of human behavior is not evidence that something is wrong with us, but evidence that something holy still lingers within us?

The same ache that can lead people toward addiction, obsession, or self-destruction may actually be the human search for transcendence. That would mean that the many compulsions we carry are not signs of weakness, as much as they are signs of a hunger for life, meaning, beauty, communion, eternity.

That would mean the ache itself is not the enemy. The ache is a pointing compass.

We Are Dust — And God Knows It

There is another truth linked to this that makes us vulnerable when we feel the deep ache of needing more. We are fragile creatures. We are dust. And strangely enough, the Bible says this without contempt.

God is not shocked by human weakness. Psalm 103 says, “He remembers that we are dust.” The point is not humiliation. The point is compassion.

The prophet Ezekiel gives us one of the Bible’s great images of the human condition: a valley of dry bones scattered across the earth. No amount of self-help or determination can make them live again. Bones cannot breathe life into themselves.

Only the breath of God can do that.

That changes the idea of being a spiritual person entirely.

Our task is not to manufacture spirituality through guilt or frantic striving. Our task is to recognize the ache that is directing us to God, and then stand honestly before God and say: I cannot animate myself.

God is the One who breathes life into dry places. God animates. God awakens. God restores.

The ancient cry still matters: Hosanna. Lord, save us now.

Sometimes Wisdom Means Running

But here is something important, especially when you are in a vulnerable, achy place. Recognizing the ache as a compass pointing toward God does not mean you simply stay put and endure whatever pulls you toward destruction. Wisdom does not always say stand firm and resist with all your strength. Sometimes wisdom says something simpler: leave the room.

We often imagine maturity means being strong enough to stand near the fire without being burned. But scripture frequently gives simpler advice: flee.

Run from what destroys.

That is not weakness. That is wisdom.

A person who struggles with addiction should not romanticize proximity to temptation. A person prone to despair should not continually feed the voices that deepen the darkness. We are not saved by pretending to be invulnerable.

Admitting vulnerability is often the beginning of healing. And even here, hope remains. Grips loosen. Seasons change. The thing that feels permanent today has not yet written the final line of your story.

Waiting for Morning

The ugly part of the ache — the part that makes you feel like you cannot take it any longer — will not endure. This too will pass away.

The Psalms often describe spiritual life as waiting for dawn. Like a night watchman searching the horizon for first light.

There is something deeply human about that image. We ache. We hunger. We wait for life to break through again.

The Christian story insists that God meets people precisely there — not when they are polished and self-sufficient, but when they acknowledge their need.

God gathers the weary.

God breathes into dry bones.

God enfolds the restless heart.

The ache within you is not saying God has abandoned you.

It is likely the sign that your soul still remembers that the human race evolved from some kind of Eden.

And that memory is calling you home.

The ego we all carry has a favorite trick.

It quietly positions the camera on our own thoughts, feelings, and achievements — and then treats that frame as if it were the whole of reality. Everything gets filtered through the same essential question: How does this affect me? And before long, we’re not actually living in the world. We’re living in a script we wrote about ourselves and mistaking it for the world.

It’s worth naming what the ego actually offers us, because it does offer something. It gives us a sense of maximum importance — the feeling that we are the crucial character in every scene, the one who must be understood, defended, and celebrated.

When the Ego Plays the Victim

There is a particular moment when the ego flares with special intensity, and it doesn’t look like arrogance. It looks like pain.

It’s the moment when we feel misunderstood. When someone has gotten us wrong, dismissed us unfairly, or — worse — lied about us. When our reputation has been damaged by someone else’s narrative. When we’ve been accused of things we didn’t do, or reduced to a caricature that bears no resemblance to who we actually are.

In those moments, the ego doesn’t strut. It suffers. The misrepresentation stings because it matters to us that we are known truthfully. The wrong is real. The lie is real.
But here is where it gets complicated. The wounded ego — the self-pitying ego — is just as self-centered as the triumphant one, and often more dangerous because it feels so wronged. We replay the offense. We mentally convene a jury that always rules in our favor. We become the tragic hero of our own inner courtroom drama, certain that if people only knew the truth, everything would be set right.

And that trial can run indefinitely.

Self-pity is one of the ego’s most seductive hiding places precisely because it masquerades as wounded innocence, which again keeps us at the center of the story. The camera is still on us. The narrative is still fundamentally about “me.”

Reality Is Larger Than You Are

What the ego — whether triumphant or wounded — cannot tolerate is that reality doesn’t cooperate with the story.

Reality is always larger than we are. It includes other people’s stories, other people’s pain, the quiet work of grace operating beneath the surface of things, the slow movements of history and culture, and the mystery of a God whose life exceeds our comprehension at every point. None of that can be reduced to our opinions/preferences or our need to be right.

The ego finds this intolerable.

So it fights back. It tells us that if we are not central, we are nothing. It pushes us to reframe every situation around how we are affected, to experience disagreement as an attack, to chase visibility and validation just to feel real.

The tragedy is the more the ego demands center stage, the smaller and more fragile our actual life becomes. When we must always be front and center we are never free.

If We’re Still the Most Important, It Isn’t Reality Yet

There’s a diagnostic question worth sitting with: Am I narrating this from “How does this make me look?” or “How does this prove I’m right?” or “How do I make sure everyone knows the truth as I see it?”

Because if the answer is yes, we’re not seeing clearly. We’re watching a film we produced about ourselves and calling it the truth. The philosopher might call this a closed epistemological loop. The theologian might call it idolatry. The honest person just calls it exhausting. And who likes to be “exhausting” to those around them?

In truth, reality keeps decentering us. Not to erase us, but to set us free from the impossible task of being the main character in everything.

But the ego still persists, “If you step out of the spotlight, you will vanish.” That’s the lie at the heart of all ego — the assumption that significance requires centrality, that we must be everything or we are nothing.

Scripture tells a different story. It tells the story of a God who exalts the humble and brings down the proud — not as a punitive maneuver, but as a description of how reality actually works. The grain of wheat that falls into the ground and dies bears much fruit. The servant of all is the greatest. The one who loses his life finds it.

These are not spiritual riddles. They are a map of how things actually are.

What Happens When You Step to the Side

When we accept that we are not the show — that we are, in the best possible sense, one meaningful person among many, participating in something far bigger than our résumé or our anxieties — something in us relaxes.

We listen more and perform less. We ask questions instead of rushing to offer hot takes. We notice the needs of others not as inconvenient interruptions to our own story, but as invitations to compassion. And when we have been genuinely wronged, we learn to grieve it honestly without letting it become our entire identity. We stop being the person who was lied about and start being the person who, like Jesus, entrusted that wound to God and kept moving.

We begin to sense that our small life is held within a much larger Life, and that the goal was never to dominate the story — or to be vindicated by it — but to be faithful in our particular corner of it.
The spiritual tradition calls this humility. And humility, rightly understood, is not self-deprecation. It is not the performance of smallness. It is the accurate assessment of who and where we are — finite, loved, limited, dependent, real. It is standing in the right place in the real story.

From that humbler vantage point, reality can begin its quiet, transforming work. We stop being defended and start being open. We stop performing and start participating. We become available to truth, to love, to the people in front of us, and to God.

The Quiet Revolution

The ego promises you the world if you stay at the center of it, whether as the champion or the aggrieved. Wisdom offers something else entirely. It offers the freedom to be one real person in a real world, held by a God who is actually the main character, and who invites us into his story. We may not be the lead star but we get to be something wonderful — a genuine participant. A beloved character with actual lines. We may seem lesser to our radically inflated ego but we become an irreplaceable part of something eternal.

That exchange is the quiet revolution wisdom has been waiting to begin in us.

The ego may scream at you that stepping out of the spotlight means vanishing.

It doesn’t. It means you finally get to “be” in a way that matters most.

The Stories Anxiety Tells

Mark Twain is purported to have said, “I’ve had a lot of worries in my life — most of which never happened.”

It’s funny cause it’s true. And it’s painful because it’s true.

The mind is a gifted storyteller. Give it a doctor’s appointment, a difficult conversation, a child who hasn’t called, an expected bill — and it will spin you a detailed, cinematic, worst-case scenario complete with consequences, timelines, and emotional turmoil. And then it will run that film on repeat until you are exhausted by something that hasn’t happened and probably never will.

We are bruised more often by our imagination than by the things we actually face.

Seneca noticed this two thousand years ago: “There are more things likely to frighten us than there are to crush us; we suffer more often in imagination than in reality.” The Stoics were not naive optimists. They knew life was hard. But they also knew that the human mind has a peculiar genius for manufacturing suffering out of nothing.

The Problem with Rehearsing Catastrophe

There’s a reason we do this. The brain is wired for threat detection. In a dangerous world, the mind that anticipated the worst and prepared for it survived. Worry, at its root, is a misapplied survival instinct — an alarm system that really doesn’t know how to distinguish between a lion in the grass and a hard conversation with your boss.

The problem is worry doesn’t actually accomplish anything. It doesn’t prevent the hard thing from happening. It doesn’t prepare you in any meaningful way. It doesn’t give you wisdom, strength, or clarity. It just steals today’s peace as a down payment on a catastrophe that usually never arrives.

Worry never shields us from tomorrow’s trouble. It only empties today of its life.

What Faith Actually Offers

Scripture doesn’t pretend the world is safe. It doesn’t tell us that bad things won’t happen or that hard seasons won’t come. What it says is something far more practical and far more radical: “Be strong, do not fear; your God will come.”

Not your God will prevent everything difficult. Your God will come. He will be present in it. He will meet you there. Whatever the thing is that your anxious mind keeps rehearsing — the diagnosis, the loss, the failure, the worst case — God will be in that moment with you. And you will find that his presence in the real moment is always more sustaining than your imagined version that has you facing it alone.

That’s the thing about anxiety: it always imagines us abandoned. It runs the film without God in it. And of course the outcome looks devastating.

The Invitation

This isn’t a call to positive thinking or to pretending danger doesn’t exist. The challenge is that when you notice the storyteller in your mind spinning up another catastrophe, you don’t have to watch the whole film. You can name what’s happening — this is anxiety, not prophecy — and return to what is actually true right now. And return to the promise that you are in God’s hand. Embrace faith.

Faith is not the absence of fear. It is the practiced choice to let God’s presence be louder than anxiety’s stories.

Twain was right. Most of it never happens.

And for the things that do — you won’t face them the way your frightened mind imagines. The God who knows the future from the past will be with you. And that changes everything.

There’s a reason so many people feel like the world has gone flat.

Not literally—but something about modern life has drained the color out of things. We look at a sunset and think, nice. We hold a newborn and think, remarkable. We stand at the ocean’s edge and think, that’s big. And then we move on. We’ve seen the thing. We’ve experienced it. And somehow that experiencing left us... untouched.

The Jewish philosopher Martin Buber had a name for this. He called it the I-It orientation.

The World as Object

When modernity arrived with its great wave of science and progress that gave us so much, it came with a certain confidence. The human mind, it was argued, could stand back from the world and see it objectively. Like a doctor examining a patient, or a scientist studying a specimen, we could perceive things as they really are—clearly, rationally, without emotional contamination (you’re not internally messed with). We were the subject. Everything else was the object. And objects were there to be understood, measured, and used.

Buber said this is what it looks like to live in an I-It world. And it has its uses. Science runs on it. Engineering depends on it.

But Buber noticed something troubling: when you turn everything into an It and the whole world becomes a collection of objects for you to examine and use, you don’t actually encounter anything. You experience things, yes. But experiencing and encountering are not the same thing.

He put it this way: the I-It person “has nothing but objects. But objects subsist in time that has been.” Everything becomes past tense. A memory. A record. You’ve processed the world but the world hasn’t touched you.

He described this alienation with a haunting image. To be far away in the I-It world, he said, is what the Zulu language captures in a single word meaning “There where someone cries out: ‘O mother, I am lost.’”

That’s not just philosophy. That’s a description of what a lot of people are actually feeling right now.

The Tree That Became a Thou

Buber offered a different possibility. He called it the I-Thou.

He illustrated it with something as simple as a tree. You can look at a tree and classify it—identify the species, study its structure, reduce it to its chemical components, note the light playing off its leaves. All of that is legitimate. The tree is still an It, and you are still its observer.

But. He writes: “It can, however, also come about, if I have the will and grace, that in considering the tree I become bound up in relation to it. The tree is no longer It. I have been seized by the power of exclusiveness.”

Notice what he said: “will and grace.” It’s not just about trying harder to appreciate things. There’s something that happens to you when you shift from examining the world to being in relation with it. The tree stops being a data point and starts being, somehow, a presence. You aren’t just looking at it. Something is happening between you.

This is the I-Thou. And according to Buber, “The primary word I-Thou establishes the world of relation.”

When Mystery Comes Back

Here’s where this gets interesting for those of us who follow Jesus.

What this kind of philosophy holds is something the Christian tradition always knew: the world is not a collection of inert objects. It is a web of relationships. Everything affects everything else. Nothing can be fully understood in isolation. We are, as theologian Robert Webber put it, “beings in the world enmeshed in networks, not individual autonomous selves.”

And that interconnectedness—that holism—opens a door that hard-nosed modernity had tried to seal shut: the door to mystery.

When you can reduce everything to its basic parts, when you can measure and quantify and control, mystery becomes an embarrassment. An inconvenience. The sign of a question that just hasn’t been answered yet. But when you accept that everything is in dynamic relationship with everything else, that facts are always interpreted facts, that you are always already inside the web you’re trying to describe—mystery isn’t a gap in your knowledge. It’s the texture of reality itself.

This is, I’d argue, closer to how Scripture sees the world. “The earth is the Lord’s, and everything in it” (Psalm 24:1). Creation isn’t a collection of objects—it’s a theater of divine presence. The Psalms treat nature as responsive, worshipful, relational. Even rocks and rivers are addressed as participants, not specimens. That’s an I-Thou world.

What This Means for Us

There’s a practical question lurking here: how do you live in an I-Thou world when the culture has trained you to live in an I-It one?

You slow down enough to be seized, as Buber put it. You stop consuming experiences and start receiving them. You learn, again, to be surprised. To be addressed. To let a sunset do something to you rather than just be seen by you.

At their best, Christian prayer, Christian worship, Christian community are I-Thou practices. They are not techniques for accessing God-as-object. They are ways of being present to a God who is already present to us. A God who is, as it turns out, not an It at all.

The world hasn’t gone flat. We’ve just gotten very good at treating it that way.

Much of the work we moderns must do is return to mystery.

The Ache Beneath Connection

In Civilization and Its Discontents, Freud makes an observation that feels even more piercing now than when he wrote it: “If there had been no railway to conquer distances, my child would never have left his native town and I should need no telephone to hear his voice.” It is a brilliant sentence because it doesn’t just flatter technology. The telephone is certainly a gift, but it is also a remedy that other technologies helped create the need for.

We are used to thinking about technology with the assumption that it always advances because we want life to be improved. The train connects cities. The telephone connects voices. The smartphone connects all of us to everyone and everything else. But Freud’s insight invites us to ask a deeper question: what kind of problems did technology create that called for follow-up technologies to promise to restore?

That question matters because a functional civilization is not an abstract thing. Relationships have a geography. They need rooms, tables, and chairs. They need walks, embraces, silences, meals, birthdays, ordinary Tuesdays, and the unplanned conversation at the end of the day or at the bedside in a hospital. When technology changes the shape of our lives, it changes the shape of how we engage and relate.

The Gift of Presence at a Distance

There are many reasons to be thankful for the technologies that connect us. Most of us know the mercy of a phone call, a text message, a FaceTime conversation, or a shared family thread. A daughter can send a photograph from another city. A grandparent can see a newborn who lives hundreds of miles away. A spouse traveling for work can say goodnight. A friend in the grip of loss can receive a message that says, “I am thinking of you,” at the very moment she feels most alone.

These are not small things. They are real gifts. Technology can carry affection across distance, and sometimes it makes possible a form of care that would otherwise be impossible. These mediated connections are not false simply because they are mediated.

And yet Freud’s uneasiness remains. The telephone does not simply solve the problem of distance. It also reminds us that the one who is beloved is not here.

Beneath the Convenience

Every technology of connection comes with an ache. The text message says, “I am reachable,” but also, “I am elsewhere.” The video call lets us see a face, but it frames that face behind glass, miniaturized. Social media gives us updates on people we love, but often without the intimacy of an actual conversation. We know more, yet sometimes we understand less.

This is one of the contradictions of our age. We have never had more ways to contact one another, but many people feel less known. We can send a message in seconds, but we have lost the joy of touch and the nuances we absorb only in each other’s presence. We can preserve photographs forever, but being in the moment makes an impress that digital records cannot.

The danger is not that technology makes love impossible. The danger is that it can make a thinner version of love. A like can replace a call. A reaction emoji can replace caring words. A family group chat can create the illusion that everyone has been tended to, when in truth no one has been fully listened to.

Attention Is the New Form of Fidelity

The most important question may not be, “Does technology connect us?” Of course it does. The better question is, “What does technology train us to give and withhold?” Does it train us to notice? To listen deeply? To wait? To remember? To be interruptible by the needs of another person? Or does it train us to skim one another with quick-witted reactions while we are skimming everything else?

The people we love don’t merely need access to us. They need us — the unhurried, difficult, embodied version of us. They need our eyes when they are speaking, our hands when they are tired, our forgiveness when they mess up, our presence when no one is trying to be useful. Devices can transmit words and ideas across any distance. But the things that form us, heal us, and hold us together require a great deal more than transmission.

The Christian Question

For Christians, this conversation becomes theological. The central claim of Christian faith is not that God sent an efficient message from a distance. It is that “the Word became flesh.” God’s love took on body, place, vulnerability, and presence.

We should be wary of any form of life that tempts us to disembody love. To love another person is not simply to send signals of concern. It is to become available. It is to bear burdens. It is to show up — sometimes inconveniently, sometimes silently, sometimes at real cost.

This does not mean digital communication is without value. A message sent in love is still love. A prayer texted at midnight may be a lifeline. A video call with a lonely parent may be an act of real devotion. But Christian love always presses toward incarnation. It wants, whenever possible, to become presence.

Technology is at its best when it serves that movement. It is at its worst when it tries to completely substitute it.

The Paradox We Must Live With

Freud’s railway and telephone remain with us in new forms. The technologies that separate us and the technologies that reconnect us often belong to the same world. Airplanes scatter families across continents, and video calls gather their faces on a screen. Careers take children far from home, and smartphones allow parents to hear their voices. The same civilization that multiplies distance also manufactures remedies for the loneliness it creates.

We do not need to reject these remedies. We need to use them with discernment. A call is good, but it is not the same as an embrace. A message is good, but it is not the same as a life shared. A photograph is good, but it is not the same as being there.

Technology can help us love across distance, but it cannot remove the human longing for nearness. That longing is not a defect to be engineered away. It is part of what it means to be human.

The task, then, is not to become anti-technology. It is to become more intentional lovers. We can use our devices to remember birthdays, send encouragement, arrange visits, share prayers, and keep the fragile threads of family and friendship from breaking. But we must also know when to put the device down, close the distance, and offer the irreplaceable gift of ourselves, sometimes at great cost.

Freud was right to notice the irony. We invented the railway, and then needed the telephone. We invented smartphones, and now need reminders to stop looking at them. The question before us is whether our tools will deepen our love or merely simulate it.

The answer will never be found in the device. It will be found in the habits of the heart that hold it.

The Ache Beneath Connection Planes, Trains, and Smarphones