10/16/2026
GUN CONTROL FOR YOU. ARMED PROTECTION FOR THEM. Look at the names. These are prominent Democrat politicians who have supported restrictions on civilian gun ownership while benefiting from armed protection during their political careers.
Presidents have the Secret Service. Congressional leaders have Capitol Police. Governors and mayors can have armed police details. Wealthy politicians can hire private security.
**And there is absolutely nothing wrong with protecting their lives with fi****ms.**
The question is why the ordinary American's ability to protect his own life should be treated differently.
When a politician faces a credible threat, armed protection is considered a reasonable and necessary precaution.
But what about the single mother living in a dangerous neighborhood? The elderly couple who cannot physically overpower an intruder? The woman walking to her car after working late? The family whose nearest police officer may be several minutes away?
**Are their lives somehow less worthy of armed protection?**
Chuck Schumer supported the federal assault-weapons ban. Yet he personally described being rushed to safety on January 6 by a Capitol Police officer carrying a submachine gun.
Nancy Pelosi championed an assault-weapons ban while benefiting from Capitol Police protection as Speaker.
Joe Biden and Barack Obama advocated gun restrictions while receiving Secret Service protection.
These examples don't mean that every gun restriction is a prohibition on self-defense. But they raise a legitimate question about who gets access to armed protection and who must navigate the restrictions imposed by government.
We don't begrudge these politicians their security. We want them protected. We want their families protected.
**We simply believe the lives of ordinary Americans deserve the same respect.**
An armed professional standing between a politician and a violent attacker is using a fi***rm for a legitimate defensive purpose.
An ordinary, law-abiding American seeking the means to defend his own family is acting from that same fundamental desire to survive and protect the people he loves.
The Second Amendment was not written as a special privilege for government officials, the wealthy, or those fortunate enough to have an armed security detail.
**It protects a right of the PEOPLE.**
Our position is straightforward: public safety and the constitutional right to armed self-defense must apply to Americans regardless of their wealth, political office, or social standing.
**The right to defend your life does not come with a government title or a security detail.**
**OREGON PRO 2A 🇺🇸**
LIKE & SHARE OUR POSTS TO HELP SPREAD THE MESSAGE AND REACH MORE PEOPLE. YOUR SUPPORT HELPS US GROW AND KEEP THE CONVERSATION GOING!
**Supporting sources:**
Pelosi's remarks supporting the assault-weapons ban:
https://pelosi.house.gov/news/press-releases/transcript-of-pelosi-floor-speech-on-the-assault-weapons-ban
Schumer's account of armed Capitol Police protection:
https://www.democrats.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/transcript-majority-leader-schumer-remarks-at-senate-rules-committee-on-the-january-6th-insurrection-and-the-need-to-protect-our-democracy-and-confront-donald-trumps-big-lie
Federal law governing Secret Service protection:
https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?edition=prelim&num=0&req=granuleid%3AUSC-prelim-title18-section3056