09/10/2026
The plan makes broad promises about active management, access, grazing, timber, recreation, wildlife, and community sustainability.
How will the public know whether those promises are kept?
A monitoring program that counts only broad agency activity will not tell us whether public access is reduced, grazing remains usable, timber reaches local mills, firewood areas remain available, or local families bear higher costs.
The Forest Service should track road and trail miles by public-use status, every closure or restriction and the plan component used to justify it, actual AUMs used, reasons for non-use, timber offered and delivered, local jobs and contracts, firewood access, route distance, mining and material access, and effects on older and disabled users.
Monitoring also needs baselines, public reporting, thresholds, and a required response when conditions move the wrong direction. Otherwise, the agency can report activity while local access and multiple use continue slipping away piece by piece.
The fix is an annual public scorecard that compares promises with results and requires corrective action when the plan is not delivering.
Choose “Monitoring / Accountability” in FAFA’s commenting tool. Tell the Forest Service what it must measure, report, and correct.
Comments are due September 30, 2026.
https://www.forestaccessforall.org/bmfpr-public-comment