07/14/2026
đ¨ Every American should be paying attention to what is happening with surveillance cameras in our communities.
A police officer has come forward as a whistleblower raising concerns about Flock Safetyâs nationwide camera network and the way these systems are being used. His allegations have sparked serious questions about transparency, accountability, and whether communities fully understand just how much data is being collected on ordinary citizens.
These cameras are often marketed as simple tools to help solve crimes, but the reality is much broader. Many automated license plate reader (ALPR) systems can record vehicle information, track where vehicles have traveled, create searchable movement histories, and allow data to be shared across agencies and jurisdictions.
The defenders of these systems often say, âIf youâre not doing anything wrong, you have nothing to worry about.â
History tells us that is not how freedom works.
The problem is not just what the system is capable of doingâthe problem is what happens when the wrong person gets access.
There have been multiple documented cases across the country where law enforcement officers abused ALPR databases to look up people for personal reasons, including stalking romantic partners, tracking acquaintances, or accessing information without a legitimate law enforcement purpose. In some cases, officers repeatedly searched license plates hundreds of times outside the scope of their duties.
The vast majority of law enforcement officers serve honorably and protect their communities. But our Constitution was never written with the assumption that every person in power will always act perfectly. It was written because human beings are capable of abusing authority.
That is exactly why the Fourth Amendment exists.
A free society should not accept a future where every trip to work, church, the grocery store, or a family memberâs house is recorded and stored in a database accessible to the government.
The question isnât whether technology can help catch criminals. It can.
The question is whether we are willing to sacrifice the privacy and liberty of millions of law-abiding Americans for a system that can be misused by the very people entrusted to protect us.
Power without accountability is dangerous.
Transparency, strict limits, and constitutional protections must come before expanding government surveillance.
Freedom is rarely taken away all at once. It is usually surrendered one convenience at a time.