Adjunct Professor

Adjunct Professor Agile scrum coaching.

Fifteen years ago today, I launched the first version of the Facebook website from my college dorm. At the time, it stru...
12/31/2024

Fifteen years ago today, I launched the first version of the Facebook website from my college dorm. At the time, it struck me that there were many websites to find almost anything -- books, music, news, information, businesses -- except for what actually matters most: people. So I built a simple website organized around people, where we could connect with the people we wanted and share what was important to us.
This desire to express ourselves, learn about each other, and connect in new ways was greater than I'd imagined. Within a couple of weeks, two-thirds of Harvard students were using Facebook almost every day. In the next couple of months, students from other places emailed me and my roommates to launch at their schools, and we opened at almost 30 schools. Within a year, more than one million students were connecting on the site. In a couple of years, we were working on making the service available to everyone. It took about four years for 100 million people to connect, and less than a decade for 1 billion people to connect. Today, about 2.7 billion people are connected using our services.
That first decade of people wiring up their networks was an exhilarating time. Many outsiders dismissed what was happening as a fad or inconsequential, but for those of us using these services from the early days it was clear something special and important was happening that reflected a new reality of how the world works today.
Much of people's experience in the past was defined by large hierarchical institutions -- governments, mass media, universities, religious organizations -- that provided stability but were often remote and inaccessible. If you wanted to progress, you worked your way up the ladder slowly. If you wanted to start something new or spread a new idea, it was harder without the blessing of these institutions.
Our current century is defined more by networks of people who have the freedom to interact with whom they want and the ability to easily share ideas and experiences. Facebook is far from the only network enabling this change -- it's part of the broader trend with the internet.
Before the internet, if you had different views or interests from the people in your neighborhood, it was harder to find a community that shared your interests. If someone you knew moved away, you'd often lose touch. If you wanted to raise attention for an issue, you usually had to go through politicians or the press -- someone with the power to distribute your message. If you wanted to reach new customers for your business, you often had to buy expensive ads or billboards. I'll never forget how right after we launched News Feed, we saw millions of people organize marches against violence in Colombia. We saw communities come together to do viral fundraisers.
Now, you can connect with anyone and use your voice. You don't have to go through existing institutions in the same way. People now have much greater power, and that creates opportunity, but also new challenges and responsibilities.
If the first part of this century was about wiring up these networks, the next phase will be about people using these networks to redefine every part of our society. This will require finding the right balance between the freedoms and responsibilities of a connected world.
For the last couple of years, most of the discussion has been about new social and ethical issues that these networks raise -- whether that's governing content to balance free expression and safety, the principles for protecting privacy in a world where people share so much information, how to improve health and well-being when we're always connected, and ensuring the integrity of our elections and democratic process. These are all critical issues, and we have a responsibility to manage these networks more proactively to prevent harm.
We've made real progress on these issues and built some of the most advanced systems in the world to address them, but there's a lot more to do. We're now taking steps that wouldn't have been possible even just a few years ago -- for example, this year we plan to spend more on safety and security than our whole revenue at the time of our IPO, and the artificial intelligence required to help manage content at scale didn't exist until recently. But as people use these networks to shape society, it's critical we continue making progress on these questions.
At the same time, there is another force at play as well. As networks of people replace traditional hierarchies and reshape many institutions in our society -- from government to business to media to communities and more -- there is a tendency of some people to lament this change, to overly emphasize the negative, and in some cases to go so far as saying the shift to empowering people in the ways the internet and these networks do is mostly harmful to society and democracy.
To the contrary, while any rapid social change creates uncertainty, I believe what we're seeing is people having more power, and a long term trend reshaping society to be more open and accountable over time. We're still in the early stages of this transformation and in many ways it is just getting started. But if the last 15 years were about people building these new networks and starting to see their impact, then the next 15 years will be about people using their power to remake society in ways that have the potential to be profoundly positive for decades to come.
When I started Facebook, I believed that we all have a deep desire to focus more of what we do around people -- not just content, commerce, companies, apps, or politics. I still believe this today, and I'm grateful to everyone in our community who believes this too and is building this world every single day. Here's to a great 15 years to come

  is not my meta tag 🏷️. This one is my meta tag 🏷️.   ©️®️™️ &   ©️®️™️ nothing like planning your work, then working y...
10/20/2024

is not my meta tag 🏷️. This one is my meta tag 🏷️. ©️®️™️ & ©️®️™️ nothing like planning your work, then working your plan. Adjunct Professor for hire. Search Doctor 🧑‍⚕️ Brending Klout. or call/text about.me/kiwanis

Check out johndzarlino’s video.

10/15/2024

Constitutional Conservatism is a term that has become commonly used in the media. Let's explore its origin, and how it applies to the Convention of States.

The traditional stereotypical paradigm suggests that Republicans are conservative and believe in a smaller government, lower taxes, and a healthy economy. It also indicates that Democrats believe in a much broader form of government, higher taxes, and social programs funded by taxpayers to support such programs.

This has been the general belief system and how Americans have viewed the federal government for generations. This belief system made it easy to categorize political parties and their candidates based upon traditional beliefs. As time went on, this conventional paradigm became skewed.

The current landscape of politics in general, and the way the federal government conducts business, is not a representation of the traditional protocol as outlined by the framers of the Constitution. We now hear terms used on a regular basis such as RINO (Republican In Name Only).

The term RINO refers to a candidate who has campaigned on a traditional conservative platform. Once this candidate is elected to office, their voting record varies from their campaign platform, thereby not representing the will and beliefs of the people who chose this candidate to office.

This characteristic of elected officials, in general, has, unfortunately, become common in today's political culture. As the general population of the United States grew weary of how the federal government conducts their business, the people decided to act to make a positive impact.

The Tea Party originated in 2009. The Tea Party movement is an American conservative movement within the Republican Party. The Tea Party places its view of the Constitution at the center of its reform agenda. It urges the return of a government as intended by the Founding Fathers. The term Constitutional Conservatism came from the movement, and the public adopted it.

The name Constitutional Conservative is older than the Tea Party movement but was used more often as the Tea Party movement grew in popularity. Constitutional Conservatism requires a proper balance between principle and prudence. This means living up to one's ideology and living together in a democratic community in which all acknowledge the necessity of compromise.

In 2013 the conservative media first mentioned that Article V of the Constitution provides a resolution for states to respond to a federal government that no longer serve the voters who elected them. This article provision is called the Convention of States.

The Convention of States movement is a historical first in our nation’s long history. This movement illustrates how much of the general population embody the beliefs of the framers of the Constitution.

The Convention of States belongs to all the people from any party or political persuasion wanting a return of a government that truly represents the will of the people. With a 242 year history, this is not too much to ask from any elected official

Address

78 Northview Drive Saw
Etna, OH
43018

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Adjunct Professor posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The School

Send a message to Adjunct Professor:

Shortcuts

Share

Category