05/28/2023
U.S. CONSTITUTION, Political Conmen, America's Subcultures, and Education
From The American Test United States Constitution/The Exact Quotes Test Introduction:
"Competing American Subcultures, Sophists, and Shifting Rule Sets
Most groups want their sacred doctrines or manifestos to dominate America in government, business, and cultural norms. The Christians want their New Testament to prevail as supreme law; the Muslims want their Quran; the far left might want The Communist Manifesto; the Hindus may want their Vedas to dominate national conduct; the Jews, maybe their Old Testament; and there are several other groups that promote special doctrines as well.
Group/subcultural competition is partially, but not completely, to blame for shifting national rule sets that breed distrust in American society. Combined with the lack of constitutional education, sophists have increased animosity and distrust in America by excessively fueling and preying on group competition.
When new favoritism towards a religious, ethnic, or economic ideology is expressed by a politician, members of the newly favored group might believe they are gaining power while other groups lose power. Often, however, the proclaimed favoritism towards a group is a theatrical act of half-truths for financial or political gain, a gain for oligarchs at the expense of citizens. When a once-favored group can no longer function for political or financial gain, the sophists will cease to favor that group, and the sophists will swap out that once-favored group for another group. Sophists switch out favored subcultural groups in order to alter rule sets and social norms, often so they do not have to pay or honor the previously established contracts. After sophists swap out subcultural groups, old for new, there is a shift in national codes of conduct because there are usually special doctrines attached to each incoming and outgoing group; a so-called "new and improved" manifesto or religious scripture comes with the newly favored subculture. When there is a shift in codes of conduct, many people who played fairly according to the rules of yesterday suddenly become the criminals of today, and this has greatly contributed to the lack of faith in 21st century America. When the good people according to yesterday’s proclaimed rules become villains due to the new rules of today, there is a change in wealth and power. However, during this power shift, while many citizens lose, the sophists will keep or gain power. Sophists change favored groups to change declared rules for the very purpose of keeping or gaining power.
When a set of rules is first enforced by sophists, in the beginning stages, near the time when the rules are first declared, those rules are difficult for the masses to adapt to, but, over time, many citizens from the masses learn to adapt; they find strategies to leverage the rules to their advantage. Over time, with evolving techniques, many everyday citizens gain greater wealth and power comparable to the oligarchs. This advancement by the masses threatens the sophist.
The sophist keenly observes the momentum of the masses. Wishing to keep control over society and stop the cultural momentum, once again for another round, the sophist switches to yet another subculture's doctrine of so-called "moral conduct": again, drastically changing social norms, for the support of another wave of unconstitutional legislation, judgment, and enforcement. Controlled mass communication and great oratory skills, while the opposition is silenced, facilitate the executive, judicial, and legislative changes desired by sophists. By randomly shifting and promoting the doctrines of another group (new codes of so-called "ethical" conduct), sophists are able to vilify the citizens who greatly benefited from adapting to the rules of yesterday. After vilification, with another set of unconstitutional rules, and using the pressure of the media, sophists gain enough public and government support to severely tax, fine, imprison, attack, or kill those that were triumphant under the rules of yesterday.
With shifting rule sets, titles of nobility, bills of attainder, and ex post facto laws have been common tools of sophists, from ancient Greece to modern America. Because over 90 percent of Americans (including citizens of private industry, law enforcement, and military members) are unread in their Constitution and, therefore, unfamiliar with terms such as "title of nobility," "ex post facto law," and "bill of attainder," political sophists are able to get away with creating titles of nobility, bills of attainder, and ex post facto laws, at least for operational purposes.
Titles of nobility give additional liberties to one group while denying those liberties to others. Bills of attainder punish people just for being members of a group, often without trial. An ex post facto law is a law that punishes acts that were done legally before the ratification of that law; for instance, if Citizen A did Action A before 2015, at a time when Action A was legal, and then the government declares Action A illegal in 2022 (a later date), but punishes Citizen A for doing Action A during 2015, then that would be an ex post facto law.
Bills of attainder, ex post facto laws, and granting titles of nobility are illegal according to Article I, Sections 9 and 10 of the Constitution. Sophists in American government, from local to federal, use those anti-constitutional protocols, as well as others, for their gains at the expense of citizens. Sophists can get away with using anti-constitutional legislation and enforcement because most American citizens (voters and members of local, state, and federal governments) have almost zero knowledge of the U.S. Constitution. By the cultural act of American citizens forgetting their Constitution, the stable foundational laws become non-existent when addressing matters of physical and financial reality (lawsuits, taxes, use of police force, incarceration, national defense, et cetera). To deal with matters of immigration, incarceration, war, taxes, trade, and liberty, the cultural failure of not knowing the text and structure of the Constitution creates a condition that is temporarily the same as not having a Constitution at all. Since Americans have forgotten their Constitution, sophists can make up almost any law that they want. For all practical purposes, even sophists that do not hold formal legislative positions can make laws with America’s constitutional amnesia.
A stable legal foundation, the best defense against political conmen, will only exist in the United States when a high percentage of citizens know the real text and structure of their United States Constitution. The legal foundation of the nation will strengthen as the percentage of constitutionally educated citizens grows. Legal stability increases with knowledge of the letter of the law; a reduction in the negative effects of sophistry will correlate with increased knowledge of the true Constitution held by fellow citizens.
The laws of physics take effect whether the human mind knows them or not, but the laws of a society can only take effect if its citizens are sharply aware of those man-made laws. An objective of the American Test is to vastly increase that awareness through the repetitive practice of identifying the true text and structure of the Constitution (article, section, and text)—the opposite of being indoctrinated through the so-called "legal" and "moral" persuasion of sophists. America will vastly improve with constitutional education.
21st Century Compromise: Acceptance Again
When America’s subcultures relearn and re-accept the U.S. Constitution as the supreme law, sophists will have greater difficulty fooling those subcultures about what is and is not constitutional. America’s groups will be more tightly bound . . ."
-- Alexander Higgins, Creator/Author of The American Test