08/08/2025
What do I mean when I say students must be 100% on go-arounds and go-around calls but not necessarily perfect on landings? How do I judge that?
Judging go-around technique is easy. They need to maintain control of the airplane throughout the go-around process. No excessive pitch or roll angles. If tower requests a side-step they should be able to execute it, otherwise stay over the runway until past the departure threshold. If I call a go-around over the runway the student should react without the airplane ever touching the runway, especially if practicing in an airplane with retractable gear.
Judging go-around calls is more confusing. As I already said, if an actual go-around is needed, the student should always beat me to the call. Otherwise, I simply don't relax my landing standards below what I think they should be doing on their final check ride. If they touch down on the nose-gear and bounce, or really if they bounce for any reason, that's a landing they should have gone around. If they settle down significantly off center-line or askew of straight down the runway, that's another landing they should have gone around. Even a wind induced side load on landing should have been a go around. If we're doing a short field landing and they touch down before the target or too far beyond it, that should have been a go-around.
Some argue if a student is that proficient at landing they'd be ready for their check ride! No, they wouldn't. Remember, this is about whether they are proficient at calling go-arounds. Yes, they may be landing the same when they get to their check ride, but they'll be doing it with fewer go-arounds in between. That will be what they are practicing between their first solo and their check ride, not bad landings.
Relaxing standards is the last thing a student needs right before being sent on their own in the cockpit. When I'm there, bad landings are simply missed go-around calls. When I'm not there it could end up far worse.
Send a message to learn more