Americans for Prosperity Foundation

Americans for Prosperity Foundation is extending an open offer to share their extensive knowledge regarding the Loper Bright Supreme Court Case and Chevron Deference to Rep. Rosa DeLauro and her staff:

We're suing the state of Delaware. Their invasive disclosure mandates expose any citizen engaging in independent advocacy, "leaving politicians and the media as the only voices in the public square".

Americans should be able to support the causes they believe in without fear.

Americans for Prosperity Foundation Files Lawsuit Challenging Delaware’s Unconstitutional Law that Chills Speech and Private Association - AFPF Wilmington, DE — April 21, 2026 — Americans for Prosperity Foundation (AFPF), and its sister organization Americans for Prosperity (AFP), the nation’s premier grassroots advocacy organization, today announced they have filed a lawsuit against the State of Delaware challenging the constitutiona...

On Constitution Day, Ryan Mulvey reflects on the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Loper Bright v. Raimondo—a ruling that ended Chevron deference and reaffirmed the separation of powers.

For 40 years, Chevron deference allowed unelected bureaucrats to interpret laws with minimal judicial oversight, undermining the Framers’ vision of checks and balances.

Loper Bright restores the judiciary’s role in interpreting laws and empowers Congress to reclaim its constitutional authority. It’s a win for liberty and accountability.

As Mulvey writes, “Federal agencies are now more firmly subject to the rule of law. They must operate within clear bounds, and courts must ensure those bounds are respected.”

Congress rejected child care mandates, profit-sharing schemes, and stock buyback bans in the CHIPS Act. But the Commerce Department imposed them anyway.

After years of FOIA litigation, AFP Foundation uncovered documents showing how Secretary Raimondo used vague statutory language to push policies Congress explicitly voted down.

The Supreme Court’s Loper Bright decision is a wake-up call: vague laws invite abuse. If Congress wants to stop unelected bureaucrats from rewriting policy, it must draft laws clearly and reclaim its constitutional authority.

Read more from AFPF’s Kevin Schmidt:

Op-Ed: Kevin Schmidt: How vague statutory language enabled the Biden administration’s CHIPS Act overreach, and what Congress must do next When Congress rejected sweeping child care subsidies in the Inflation Reduction Act, the Biden administration’s Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo reportedly told her staff, “if Congress wasn’t going to do what they should have done, we’re going to do it in implementation.”

A Rhode Island judge upheld that fishermen must pay costly onboard observers, even after SCOTUS ended Chevron deference. This shows why courts now need to interpret laws, not defer to bureaucrats. Learn why this matters for anyone touched by federal rule-making.

Rhode Island Judge Rules Against Fishermen in Companion Case to Loper Bright - AFPF A federal judge in the District of Rhode Island ruled in favor of the government yesterday in Relentless v. Department of Commerce, the companion case to Loper Bright v. Raimondo, which was sent back to lower courts on remand after the Supreme Court’s historic decision last year. With the end of ...

Too often, outdated regulations protect established interests at the expense of patients, entrepreneurs, and innovation.

AFPF provided input to the Department of Justice urging them to examine Certificate of Need (CON) laws—regulations that can restrict access to care and limit competition.

AFPF Provides Input on CON Laws to DOJ Anticompetitive Regulations Task Force - AFPF Arlington, VA | Today, Americans for Prosperity Foundation (AFP Foundation) filed a public comment on how certificate-of-need (CON) laws harm patients and stifle innovation in the health care industry. AFP Foundation submitted the comment to the Department of Justice Antitrust Division’s newly lau...

Recent findings show that leaders at the VA in Omaha manipulated the consult system to keep veterans from accessing community care—care they were legally entitled to.

This raises serious concerns about transparency and accountability in a system designed to serve those who served us.

Ensuring veterans can access timely, high-quality care—whether within the VA or in their communities—must remain a priority.

VA Omaha Leaders Rig Consult System to Deny Veterans Access to Community Care - AFPF The OIG’s report underscores that VA’s internal culture remains one where bureaucratic self-preservation is more important than veterans’ well-being.

ICYMI: This week, AFP Foundation's John Tidwell spoke on the steps of the U.S. Supreme Court during a pivotal moment for school choice.

The case at hand raises an important question: Should access to public education options be limited based on who operates the school?

How states approve and regulate charter schools plays a major role in shaping what families can access—and whether all students have the opportunity to learn in a setting that fits their needs.

School choice remains a key way to ensure that opportunity is as broad and diverse as the students seeking it.

ICYMI: AFP Foundation Speaks at SCOTUS Rally During Historic School Choice Case - AFPF WASHINGTON, D.C. – In case you missed it, Americans for Prosperity Foundation (AFPF)-Oklahoma State Director John Tidwell advocated for parental rights and school choice at a rally in front of the United States Supreme Court today during oral arguments for St. Isidore of Seville Catholic Virtual S...

When families speak out about their education options, it’s worth listening.

The case surrounding St. Isidore of Seville Catholic Charter School isn’t just about one school—it raises broader questions about how charter schools are approved and what criteria can or should limit a family’s access to public education alternatives.

How states handle charter authorizations can shape whether families have access to the environments that best meet their children’s needs. This is an important moment for understanding how policy decisions can impact educational opportunity.

'Bad for parents': School choice supporters protest exclusion of religious charter in Supreme Court case School choice advocates rally as the Supreme Court hears St. Isidore, a case that could allow public funds for religious charter schools—raising church and state concerns.