11/08/2023
A lot of people have been talking about bird names for the past few days. I'm so glad that people are thinking about birds but have seen some confusion and misinterpretation. These are my personal thoughts on eponymous bird names...
It's not for me to judge what makes someone else uncomfortable, but I know that after I started learning a little more about the history of some of the people honored in bird names, it makes ME uncomfortable.
For example, Winfield Scott was a US Army officer in the 1800s. Scott's Oriole was named for him by a junior officer, but there is no evidence that Scott himself ever had an interest in birds. He was very highly regarded as a General, but, among other things, he presided over the forced removal of the Cherokee (the Trail of Tears).
Many people today could say that Scott's Oriole is named for a person who carried out the brutal persecution of their ancestors. That bothers me.
We should not ignore that history, but it shouldn't be linked to the bird.
The AOS has already accepted that such names can be changed (Thick-billed Longspur), and it is clear that Scott's Oriole and many others should also be changed.
Taking names case-by-case would be a quagmire of moral judgment, competing interests, PR campaigns, influence-peddling, and more.
Renaming ALL these birds for their appearance, sounds, habitat, etc. is the only viable solution. Not because all these people were bad, but because it's impossible to determine who was "good enough" to put their name on a bird.
And simply because birds are not objects, and should not have to carry the banner for a person, no matter how good that person was.
This process will not be fast and I don't expect anyone to adjust immediately to new names as they are announced. I ask everyone, myself included, to keep an open mind and stay flexible as things change.