01/19/2017
http://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2017/01/18/510304871/what-does-it-mean-when-cancer-findings-cant-be-reproduced
What Does It Mean When Cancer Findings Can't Be Reproduced?
Results from some key cancer studies were different when the experiments were redone in different labs. Scientists don't yet know why but say the answer could have health implications for patients.
09/30/2016
Curing the Cancer of Cancer - Biotechin.Asia
Why revolutionizing the scholarly publication system can have more impact on curing cancer than any single research project, and why Google should do it.
09/15/2016
Peer review – One of the 7 biggest problems facing science, according to 270 scientists
http://www.vox.com/2016/7/14/12016710/science-challeges-research-funding-peer-review-process
The 7 biggest problems facing science, according to 270 scientists
These are dark times for science so we asked hundreds of researchers how to fix it.
06/29/2016
Biotechin.Asia liked what we do and wrote about us. Thanks Biotechin.Asia!
https://biotechin.asia/2016/06/28/spapers-redefining-the-peer-review-process-of-your-research/
SPapers: Redefining the peer review process of your research
There has been always a question about how to showcase scientific research in a better way; is there a better way to make sense of the papers you published? The answer is YES! SPapers is one such p…
05/13/2016
http://www.scilogs.com/communication_breakdown/kamy-singer-q-and-a/
One Scientist’s Attempt to Create a New Science Communication Platform
As someone who writes about science communication, I’m always interested in experiments designed to help people share information about research and research
05/12/2016
Our peer review system for research scientists is finally online!
05/03/2016
https://academicirregularities.wordpress.com/2016/05/01/are-we-seeing-the-rise-of-the-trump-academic/
Are we seeing the rise of the Trump Academic?
A post by Mark Carrigan caught my imagination a few weeks ago. It was about ‘networking’ with its usual connotations of “insincerity, instrumentalism and general creepiness”. We can all recognise t…
04/14/2016
Hi everybody! We are going to launch a new peer review service for research scientists very soon. See the description of how it works and feel free to tell us what you think.
SPapers independent peer review system: As the author of a manuscript that needs peer reviewing, you provide us with the name of the peer you would like to perform the review. The peer does not have to be registered on SPapers.com, so you can choose anyone. We will invite the peer to review your manuscript. Once the peer agrees, SPapers will send him or her your manuscript. At the end of the process, we create a Certified Peer Review Report, which will include the manuscript, the review, and the contact details of the author and of the peer reviewer. Both the author and the reviewer receive a copy of the report. You can use the report to improve your research and your manuscript, and also send the report to journal editors in order to get published faster.
01/26/2016
http://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2016/01/elsevier-academic-publishing-petition/427059/
Academics Want You to Read Their Work for Free
Publishing an open-access paper in a journal can be prohibitively expensive. Some researchers are drumming up support for a movement to change that.
01/22/2014
http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2013/12/11/has-elsevier-signaled-a-new-era-for-academia-edu-and-other-professional-networks/
The End of an Era for Academia.edu and Other Academic Networks?
The Chronicle of Higher Education reports that Elsevier has issued a sweeping series of Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) take down notices regarding Elsevier-published content to Academia.ed...
12/07/2013
10 journals to go open-access in 2014
As part of the SCOAP3 publishing initiative, 10 journals in high-energy physics will offer unrestricted access to their peer-reviewed articles, starting January 1.
10/24/2013
The Scientific Publishing Sting: a Missed Opportunity? | @GrrlScientist
Bob O'Hara: The Science of Science's scientific publishing sting: don't shoot the messenger, or you might shoot yourself in the foot