Triune Defensive Concepts, LLC.

😂

Stop arguing and get training! 👊

wethepeopleholsters.com/web
Make sure you have the right tools for the range at the link above. ⤴️

I feel a strong need to go buy a S&W now. A great statement from the CEO of S&W!!!

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Smith & Wesson CEO Issues Strong Statement in the Face of 2nd Amendment Attacks

Amid an unprecedented and unjustified attack on the firearm industry, Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. President & CEO Mark Smith responded Monday with the following statement:

“A number of politicians and their lobbying partners in the media have recently sought to disparage Smith & Wesson. Some have had the audacity to suggest that after they have vilified, undermined and defunded law enforcement for years, supported prosecutors who refuse to hold criminals accountable for their actions, overseen the decay of our country’s mental health infrastructure, and generally promoted a culture of lawlessness, Smith & Wesson and other firearm manufacturers are somehow responsible for the crime wave that has predictably resulted from these destructive policies. But they are the ones to blame for the surge in violence and lawlessness, and they seek to avoid any responsibility for the crisis of violence they have created by attempting to shift the blame to Smith & Wesson, other firearm manufacturers and law- abiding gun owners.

It is no surprise that the cities suffering most from violent crime are the very same cities that have promoted irresponsible, soft-on-crime policies that often treat criminals as victims and victims as criminals. Many of these same cities also maintain the strictest gun laws in the nation. But rather than confront the failure of their policies, certain politicians have sought more laws restricting the 2nd Amendment rights of law-abiding citizens, while simultaneously continuing to undermine our institutions of law and order. And to suppress the truth, some now seek to prohibit firearm manufacturers and supporters of the 2nd Amendment from advertising products in a manner designed to remind law-abiding citizens that they have a Constitutional right to bear arms in defense of themselves and their families.

To be clear, a Smith & Wesson firearm has never broken into a home; a Smith & Wesson firearm has never assaulted a woman out for a late-night run in the city; a Smith & Wesson firearm has never carjacked an unsuspecting driver stopped at a traffic light.

Instead, Smith & Wesson provides these citizens with the means to protect themselves and their families.

We are proud of our 170-year history. We are proud of the commitment of our employees to making a quality product. We are proud to provide law-abiding citizens and law enforcement – our customers – with the tools to provide for their security and independence. We are proud of our responsible business practices.

We will continue to work alongside law enforcement, community leaders and lawmakers who are genuinely interested in creating safe neighborhoods. We will engage those who genuinely seek productive discussions, not a means of scoring political points. We will continue informing law-abiding citizens that they have a Constitutionally-protected right to defend themselves and their families. We will never back down in our defense of the 2nd Amendment.”
Smith & Wesson – EMPOWERING AMERICANS.

Link to press release:

www.smith-wesson.com

A good read.

Adversarial Attraction: the Predator's Optic | RECOIL Society can be broken down into 2 types of targets - hard and soft. The Predator's Optic refers to adversarial attraction. Do you look like a victim?

Heads up for those who have, or are thinking of purchasing an 80% lower.

https://www.recoilweb.com/leaked-atf-documents-on-80-parts-166825.html?fbclid=IwAR0bsnR7VLrB_eKeuOnqceGOq4tsUI4oNHrQfLDPVYzn2hz5PoXRHHazoIo

Leaked: ATF Documents on 80% Parts | RECOIL Read: Leaked: ATF Documents on 80% Parts from Forrest Cooper on April 20, 2021 for Recoil.

On this day in 1775 🇺🇸

https://youtu.be/0gHI5UugcJo

MAGAZINE BAN & SILENCER BAN INTRODUCED!!! In this video we discuss two proposed bills one targeting magazines and the other silencers.Join USCCA: http://usccapartners.com/armedscholarSafelife defense...

Very surprised this came from CNN.

Fact-checking Biden's speech announcing new executive actions on gun control In the wake of another series of mass shootings around the US, President Joe Biden announced several gun-control focused executive actions on Thursday.

Some good news about ammo!

Big Green Is Back: Re*****on Ammo Plant Working 24/7 Re*****on Ammunition President Jason Vanderbrink announced that "the Big Green is back" and showcased the company's Lonoke, Ark. plant.

Ugh...

Price Increase Announced for Wi******er and Browning Ammo - We've all been hoping ammo prices will come back down soon. Unfortunately, it looks like there's still not much light at the end of the shortage tunnel...

It’s almost as if it really isn’t really about public safety...

Philly gun arrests are on a record pace, but convictions drop under DA Krasner Police are on pace to make 3,000 arrests this year for carrying a gun illegally, a record, but the people charged are less likely to be convicted.

I recently saw a post (on another page) discussing the merits of aiding someone being attacked. Most people's answers were driven by a moral imperative, but one of the things that many people didn't consider was the true legal ramifications of doing so.

Back when I use to teach fi****ms courses, two of which were focused on use of deadly force in self-defense, I was required (by the NRA) to have a law professional teach the portion of the course that dealt with the legalities and ramifications of using deadly force. My takeaways from those sessions were:

In order to use "deadly force", you have to be willing to:
1) Go broke defending yourself in proving your innocence/level of liability
2) Loose your gun rights forever
3) Go to jail for the rest of your life

If you can't answer "yes" to each of those questions, then it shouldn't be an option/action...meaning, that the altercation isn't worth engaging in to begin with, and especially NOT the use of deadly force. Now...replace "firearm" with any other method of self-defense that could result in bodily harm, permanent disability, and/or result in death. Those same questions apply, and should be the deciding factors that dictate your action or inaction.

Listen to this video, particularly around the 14 minute mark, on just exactly what you're likely to face if/when being charged with or sued because of an altercation. https://youtu.be/Wilf_R5wlNQ

To quote one of my Martial Arts Teachers, "...it's best for everyone if they just keep their mouths shut, hands to themselves, and walk away."

Do you Need Carry Insurance? Lawyer Andrew Branca shoots us straight I went with USCCA CCW Insurance - https://bit.ly/2HA5iBtShould you get CCW insurance in case the worst should happen and you need to defend yourself with a g...