
THE UNDER PERFORMANCE LEGEND.
Companies that have a high level of employee turnover are generally viewed with suspicion. At best, significant churn seems to indicate an inexperienced team with low morale; at worst, an organization rife with mismanagement.
In fact clients often look to the stability of the company employees when deciding on their business and sometimes set out clauses in agreements as the basis for pulling back business
Let's looked at it this way.
Companies are sometimes stack with none performing employees for fear of the terminal obligations
Turnover allows companies the opportunity to replace under-performing employees with higher performers and to inject a fresh set of ideas and skills into the mix
The urge for stable teams can potentially
hurt the company's ability to make personnel changes that would improve the health of their operations.
With the changing world, companies may not require the same people if they need to embrace change constantly and bring in new skills.
Why for example spend on training each individual team member when actually new employee could train all the others as a return on his/her salary.
It's here that one will realise that the cost of maintaining an under performance legend is much higher than the cost and advantages of getting a smart and talented employee to fix the problems created by the legend!
Finally, and perhaps most importantly, there is some chicken-and-egg confusion: clients may notice a relationship between turnover and performance, and assume that high turnover is causing under performance, rather than the under performance spurring the management to make personnel changes, including bringing on new individuals to turn the ship around.
All one needs is to have strict written policies & procedures to help the new comers easily fit in or else you miss on all that comes with stability
This not say that one must fire a bunch of employees randomly and then they will perform better with ones but it’s rather more that organizations are loathe to change even when circumstances dictate. They simply don’t consider whether they need to update the skill set of their teams or bring in new talent.
Besides, the Gen Z employees would prefer frequent job changes for immediate financial rewards yet they bring in fresh perspectives on productivity