08/05/2026
【城市野化(Urban Rewilding)與自然式植栽(Naturalistic Planting)】
城市野化強調最小化人為干預,讓植被自然演替;自然式植栽則模仿自然生態,以多樣原生或適應性植物形成複合群落。國內外研究顯示,這兩者能革新都市綠地結構、構築生態網絡,並帶來顯著的環境與氣候效益。以下依據國際科學文獻(如牛津大學、LSE Grantham Institute等研究)與台灣相關應用案例(如宮脇式造林法導入),逐點說明。
👉1. 結構革新:多層次複層群落 / 食物森林
傳統都市植栽多為單一層次(如草坪或單種樹木),易受氣候衝擊且維護成本高。城市野化與自然式植栽則採用多層次複層群落(multi-layered polyculture),模擬自然森林結構:包含冠層樹木、亞冠層灌木、地被層、藤蔓與根層,形成食物森林(Food Forest)。
🍀研究支持:國際文獻指出,食物森林作為自然基礎解決方案(Nature-based Solutions),能快速建立自我維持的生態系統,2–3年內即達近免維護狀態,比傳統造林更具韌性。美國林務局與多篇都市農業研究顯示,此結構可垂直利用空間,提升產量與生態功能。
🍀台灣應用:台灣引入日本宮脇式造林法(Miyawaki Method),密集種植多種原生植物,形成複層森林,已在都市隙地與校園應用。研究顯示,此法比傳統單層植栽更快達到穩定群落,生物多樣性與土壤健康顯著提升。
🍀益處:結構複雜度提高後,系統更能抵抗極端氣候,降低維護成本,並提供食物、遮蔭等多重服務。
👉2. 生態網絡
城市野化透過留白與自然演替,串聯碎片化的綠地,形成生態網絡(Ecological Networks),包括綠廊道、棲地走廊與生物多樣性節點。
🍀國際證據:柏林等城市研究顯示,野化區能促進物種遷移、基因交流與生態連通性,避免孤島效應。英國Rewilding Britain與歐洲都市生態研究指出,連接的綠地網絡可提升整體生態韌性。
🍀台灣脈絡:雖規模較小,但台北田園城市政策與橋下自然式植栽實驗(中興大學、嘉義大學等團隊),已開始透過隙地與河岸植栽構築小型生態網絡,強化都市與周邊自然連結。此網絡不僅保護野生動物,還讓都市居民更容易接觸自然,提升心理健康。
👉3. 關鍵效益:碳匯能力提升、調節微氣候、生物多樣性提升
多篇國際研究(如2024–2025年牛津大學、LSE與Nature系列論文)證實,城市野化與自然式植栽的複層結構遠優於傳統綠化:
🍀碳匯能力提升:複雜植被(含根系與土壤)能固定更多碳,比單一樹木種植或人工林更高效。Rewilding研究顯示,野化景觀的碳儲存量更高,且具長期穩定性;部分案例中,土壤與生物質碳匯優於傳統造林。 台灣宮脇式應用亦顯示,密集複層森林的固碳能力顯著高於傳統方式。
🍀調節微氣候:多層植被能降低都市熱島效應、增加保濕、過濾空氣污染物,並改善 stormwater 管理。研究指出,野化綠地可創造涼爽微氣候,減少能源消耗。
🍀生物多樣性提升:最小干預促進自然演替,提供多樣棲位,吸引授粉昆蟲、鳥類與微生物。都市野化區的物種豐富度常高於人工綠地,包含瀕危物種。
👉4. 指標案例:德國柏林自然公園(Natur-Park Südgelände)
柏林Natur-Park Südgelände(前身為廢棄鐵路調車場)是全球公認的城市野化典範,1980年代起因停用而自然演替,1999年正式開放為自然公園,面積約18公頃。
🍀轉型過程:早期生態調查發現自然演替已形成豐富棲地,規劃採「分區管理」——部分區域完全野化(無干預),部分適度控制以保護稀有物種,保留鐵路遺跡作為文化元素。
🍀生態成果(最新調查):
◎植物:超過350種(含多種瀕危物種,如meadow hawkweed)。
◎動物:30種繁殖鳥類、95種野生蜜蜂(佔柏林蜜蜂物種約1/3)、57種蜘蛛、15種蚱蜢,以及49種大型真菌。
◎外來物種亦融入,形成新型都市生態。
🍀都市貢獻:提供高品質綠地、生物多樣性熱點,同時作為教育與休憩空間,證明野化不僅可行,還能與都市生活和諧共存。柏林其他野化案例(如柏林牆綠帶)更擴大成生態網絡,強化全城韌性。
👉城市野化與自然式植栽是低成本、高效益的都市永續策略,能回應氣候變遷、生物多樣性危機與居民福祉。可借鏡柏林模式,從屋頂、橋下、閒置地開始,結合宮脇式與食物森林概念,逐步建構更具生命力的都市生態。未來若能納入更多量化監測(如碳匯數據),將進一步強化政策推動。這些做法不僅是綠化,更是讓都市「重新野化」回歸自然平衡。
#城市野化 #植物群落 #生物多樣性 #共耕食代 #共耕農藝小學堂
Urban Rewilding and Naturalistic Planting
Urban rewilding emphasizes minimizing human intervention to allow vegetation to undergo natural succession. Naturalistic planting, on the other hand, imitates natural ecosystems by creating complex communities using diverse native or climate-adapted plants. Domestic and international research shows that both approaches can revolutionize urban green space structures, build ecological networks, and deliver significant environmental and climate benefits. The following explanation is based on international scientific literature (such as studies from Oxford University and the LSE Grantham Institute) and Taiwan-specific application cases (such as the introduction of the Miyawaki Method).
👉1. Structural Innovation: Multi-layered Complex Communities / Food Forests
Traditional urban planting is mostly single-layered (e.g., lawns or monoculture trees), making it vulnerable to climate shocks and costly to maintain. Urban rewilding and naturalistic planting instead adopt multi-layered polycultures that simulate natural forest structures—including canopy trees, subcanopy shrubs, ground-cover layers, vines, and root layers—to create food forests.
🍀 Research Support: International literature highlights food forests as nature-based solutions that can rapidly establish self-sustaining ecosystems, reaching near maintenance-free status within 2–3 years and offering greater resilience than conventional afforestation. Studies by the U.S. Forest Service and multiple urban agriculture reports show that this structure makes vertical use of space, boosting both productivity and ecological functions.
🍀 Taiwan Application: Taiwan has adopted Japan’s Miyawaki Method, densely planting multiple native species to form multi-layered forests. It has already been applied in urban gaps and school campuses. Research demonstrates that this approach reaches stable communities faster than traditional single-layer planting, with marked improvements in biodiversity and soil health.
🍀 Benefits: Once structural complexity increases, the system becomes far more resistant to extreme weather, significantly reduces maintenance costs, and delivers multiple services such as food production and shade.
👉2. Ecological Networks
Urban rewilding creates ecological networks by leaving areas undisturbed for natural succession, linking fragmented green spaces through green corridors, habitat pathways, and biodiversity nodes.
🍀 International Evidence: Studies in cities such as Berlin show that rewilded zones promote species migration, gene flow, and ecological connectivity, preventing island effects. Organizations like Rewilding Britain and European urban ecology research indicate that connected green networks enhance overall ecosystem resilience.
🍀 Taiwan Context: Although smaller in scale, Taipei’s Garden City policy and under-bridge naturalistic planting experiments (led by teams from National Chung Hsing University and National Chiayi University) have begun building small-scale ecological networks via vacant lots and riverbanks. These networks not only protect wildlife but also make it easier for urban residents to connect with nature, improving mental well-being.
👉3. Key Benefits: Enhanced Carbon Sequestration, Microclimate Regulation, and Increased Biodiversity
Multiple international studies (including 2024–2025 papers from Oxford University, the LSE, and Nature journals) confirm that the multi-layered structure of urban rewilding and naturalistic planting far outperforms traditional greening:
🍀 Enhanced Carbon Sequestration: Complex vegetation (including root systems and soil) sequesters far more carbon than single-tree planting or monoculture forests. Rewilding research shows that rewilded landscapes store higher amounts of carbon with greater long-term stability; in some cases, soil and biomass carbon storage exceeds that of conventional plantations. Taiwan’s Miyawaki applications similarly demonstrate significantly higher carbon-fixing capacity in dense multi-layered forests.
🍀 Microclimate Regulation: Multi-layered vegetation reduces the urban heat island effect, increases humidity, filters air pollutants, and improves stormwater management. Studies show that rewilded green spaces create cooler microclimates and lower energy consumption.
🍀 Increased Biodiversity: Minimal intervention encourages natural succession, providing diverse niches that attract pollinators, birds, and microorganisms. Species richness in urban rewilded areas is often higher than in manicured green spaces and frequently includes endangered species.
👉4. Landmark Case: Natur-Park Südgelände in Berlin, Germany
Berlin’s Natur-Park Südgelände (formerly a disused railway marshalling yard) is a globally recognized model of urban rewilding. Natural succession began in the 1980s after the site was abandoned; it was officially opened as a nature park in 1999, covering approximately 18 hectares.
🍀 Transformation Process: Early ecological surveys revealed that natural succession had already created rich habitats. The park adopted a “zoned management” approach—some areas are left completely wild (no intervention), while others receive light management to protect rare species. Railway relics are preserved as cultural features.
🍀 Ecological Outcomes (latest surveys):
◎ Plants: Over 350 species (including several endangered ones, such as meadow hawkweed).
◎ Animals: 30 breeding bird species, 95 species of wild bees (about one-third of Berlin’s bee species), 57 spider species, 15 grasshopper species, and 49 species of macrofungi.
◎ Non-native species have also integrated, forming a novel urban ecosystem.
🍀 Urban Contributions: The park provides high-quality green space and a biodiversity hotspot while serving as an educational and recreational area. It proves that rewilding is not only feasible but can harmoniously coexist with city life. Other Berlin rewilding projects (such as the Berlin Wall Green Belt) have expanded into city-wide ecological networks, strengthening urban resilience.
Conclusion
Urban rewilding and naturalistic planting represent low-cost, high-impact strategies for sustainable urban development. They address climate change, the biodiversity crisis, and residents’ well-being. By learning from the Berlin model, cities can begin with rooftops, under-bridge spaces, and idle land, combining the Miyawaki Method with food forest concepts to gradually build more vibrant urban ecosystems. Incorporating more quantitative monitoring (such as carbon sequestration data) in the future will further strengthen policy implementation. These practices go beyond simple greening—they represent a true “rewilding” of cities, restoring balance with nature.
06/05/2026
05/05/2026