IDE Istanbul Think-House

IDE Istanbul Think-House Official page of İDE, Istanbul Think-House.

Miko Peled, who is going to speak at an IDE Talk tomorrow, comments on  :"When we speak of the need for BDS, we are spea...
25/10/2015

Miko Peled, who is going to speak at an IDE Talk tomorrow, comments on :
"When we speak of the need for BDS, we are speaking about a resistance to an apartheid regime, a racist, colonialist regime that has been occupying Palestine for nearly seven decades. It is methodically racist, it is brutal and unforgiving and it will not stop unless we, people of conscience, the constituency of conscience, join together to replace it with a democracy that represents all the people who live in Palestine. Just as people of conscience helped to bring down apartheid in South Africa, and people of conscience brought down the apartheid system that used to exist in the Southern states of the United States so must we all participate in this struggle and BDS gives us the means to do this in a simple, principled and proven method.

When people ask about the possibility of a third intifada, my reply is that a Global Intifada to free Palestine is already here. its called BDS."

http://mikopeled.com/2014/12/05/my-comments-on-bds-at-the-amp-conference-november-2014-in-chicago/

Thank you for inviting me to be part of this panel. The reason that BDS and other forms of resistance exist is because Palestine is not free, it is occupied, its people endure the hardships of an o...

IDE Interview with Hamid Dabashi on the post-Arab Spring emancipatory politics: “Labor unions, women’s rights organizati...
05/10/2015

IDE Interview with Hamid Dabashi on the post-Arab Spring emancipatory politics: “Labor unions, women’s rights organizations, and student assemblies are the three formations of revolutionary momentum”
http://ide.org.tr/detay.asp?ac=haber&id=130

Hamid Dabashi on the post-Arab Spring potential for emancipatory politics: “Labor unions, women’s rights organizations, and student assemblies are the three formations of revolutionary momentum” Yorum / 04.10.2015 Hamid Dabashi on the post-Arab Spring potential for emancipatory politics: “Labor unio…

Mohammad Fadel: "We are in the throws of a violent counter-revolution that cannot succeed"http://www.ide.org.tr/detay.as...
16/05/2015

Mohammad Fadel: "We are in the throws of a violent counter-revolution that cannot succeed"
http://www.ide.org.tr/detay.asp?ac=haber&id=124

Mohammad Fadel: "We are in the throws of a violent counter-revolution that cannot succeed" Yorum / 17.05.2015 Mohammad Fadel is an Associate Professor & Toronto Research Chair for the Law and Economics of Islamic Law at the University of Toronto Faculty of Law. Professor Fadel wrote his Ph.D. disser…

Following İDE's Islamism 2014 Conference M. A. Muqtedar Khan gave an interview to POMEAS project on the Arab Spring, whe...
18/11/2014

Following İDE's Islamism 2014 Conference M. A. Muqtedar Khan gave an interview to POMEAS project on the Arab Spring, where İDE's Halil Ibrahim Yenigun was also present:
"And then now we see that the way ISIS is interpreting Islam, practicing slavery, violence, and killing innocent people. There is no way that I would ever associate these practices, with my religious beliefs. But these practices are authenticated and legitimized using Islamic sources. I can find texts from the Qur'an and the Hadith to support the war ISIS is doing. I can make the case for them. I cannot say what they are doing is entirely unIslamic and a lie. . So, that is the problem. There are multiple ways that Islam can be interpreted from the same sources. It is very important for us to revisit them. I have sad news for you. Until we fix the usul (essentials) and the way we define Islamic law, until we go back and revisit this issue, we will continue to have these problems. We had the Khawarij, now, we have ISIS and al-Qaeda. You can militarily crush ISIS but that does not mean that it will not happen again ten or fifteen years later. What we really need to do is not only come up with an understanding of Islam which is clearly consistent with its practices, but also finding an Islamic argument to delegitimize ISIS- like interpretations. This is more important."


http://www.ide.org.tr/detay.asp?ac=haber&id=119

POMEAS Interview with Muqtedar Khan after the Islamism 2014 Conference Yorum / 18.11.2014 3 November 2014, IstanbulMuqtedar Khan is Associate Professor in the Political Science and International Relations Department at the University of Delaware. He is the founder and the first Director of the Islam…

Following İDE's Islamism 2014 Conference M. A. Muqtedar Khan gave an interview to POMEAS project on the Arab Spring, whe...
17/11/2014

Following İDE's Islamism 2014 Conference M. A. Muqtedar Khan gave an interview to POMEAS project on the Arab Spring, where İDE's Halil Ibrahim Yenigun was also present:
"People say Muslims are suffering from occupation, violence; Muslim youth in the West are suffering from alienation, etc., and therefore resorting to violence, but to be honest, there are also other communities who are suffering from occupation. Tibetans are occupied, but they are not resorting to su***de bombing. There are other immigrant communities in Europe who have suffered from racism, marginalization, like Muslims do; and they are not all becoming terrorists; so Muslims have to acknowledge that there is a role of Islamic thought in Muslim radicalism. If they deny it we will not be able to solve it. We did deny this throughout the 1990s, we called everybody who did that Islamophobes. And we continue to do that today. If Muslims continue to deny there is some culpability of at least some part of the Muslim thought in extremism we will not able to identify the source of cancer and fix it."

http://pomeas.org/Home/index.php/interviews/463-interview-with-muqtedar-khan

Interview with Muqtedar Khan Print Email 3 November 2014, Istanbul Muqtedar Khan is Associate Professor in the Political Science and International Relations Department at the University of Delaware. He is the founder and the first Director of the Islamic Studies Program at his current university. Kh…

01/11/2014

ISTANBUL THINK-HOUSE (IDE):
OUR MANIFESTO

Why do human beings seek to know, and how do they know? Although it is impossible to answer these thorny questions to everyone’s satisfaction, the never-ending inquiry and quest for answers serves as the starting point of IDE’s endeavor. Another focal point is the power-knowledge relationship, for to know something often denotes the ability to fulfill it. We live at a time when the critique against deploying objective knowledge claims to disguise certain political, economic, and related impulses has become increasingly vocal and widespread. This forceful voice of dissent has called into question the tabula rasa upon which the accomplishments of modernity are supposedly reflected and has exposed the flawed foundations of its premises.
Furthermore, the human sciences’ espousal of the natural sciences’ triumph has validated the conviction that their purpose was simply to replicate the project of modernity rather than serve as a gateway to objective knowledge. The objects of these former sciences have traditionally been viewed as mere passive recipients who exist only to assume their ever-changing assigned roles and postures and submit to being nothing more than a constantly changed directed other vis-à-vis the powerful.
But something fundamental has changed, for now these “others” are demanding to speak for themselves. And they are indeed speaking out.
The most striking examples of those power-knowledge complexes configured by hegemonic power relations and that work almost always against the subjugated can be observed in the think-tank industry, which took root in the Euro-American world during the last century. Knowledge, which used to possess a relatively secure space in the academy one in which it could exist for its own sake increasingly fell under the tutelage of market forces and financial/political power to such an extent that it has now been largely commodified. This form of institutionalization almost always nullifies the moral responsibilities with which knowledge is charged: to function as a witness to truth and to pursue it endlessly.
Today, knowledge has become an instrument of strategic calculations, national interests, or market demands. And yet one core problem seems to have escaped many people’s attention: The centers of vested power and organized capital that inflict so much injustice and subjugation on others are the very same bodies that manufacture the knowledge and discourses used so effectively to obscure and render their own presence and activities invisible. As the existing power configurations become more normalized and (mis)represented as fair, their deliberately produced false reality blinds the people to just how much these configurations block the creation of those sociopolitical structures that are more just and really care about the general public’s wellbeing.
Lately, certain hegemonic processes have managed to transform and then consolidate neoliberal market fundamentalism into a universal norm by implementing it wherever possible under the guise of a successful development model. This is true in Muslim-majority countries, even in those run by Islamist-rooted governments. The same can be said of the politics in these countries, which has received its fair share of assimilation into the various Euro-American prototypes via the institutional mechanisms fostered by these same hegemonic processes. Thus it was only natural that the prevailing processes of producing commodified knowledge became the standard mode of operation in Turkey.
At present, think-tanks located in Turkey are also in the business of manufacturing far more useful and functional knowledge to serve both the government and financial capital in a more systematic and efficient fashion. Under these circumstances, it has, by definition, become futile to inquire how far such knowledge can take us in our pursuit of the knowledge of truth or knowledge that can be used to promote humanity’s common good. Challenges to and struggles against the ongoing injustice and subjugation are, fortunately, not totally absent. However, the development of alternative discourses that seek that sound and truthful knowledge in which these objections and actions on behalf of the unorganized wronged can be grounded are nowhere near sufficient.
As regards the specifics of the Muslims worldview and their particular historical experiences, it must be acknowledged that the endeavors to know (a-li-ma) and to comprehend (fa-qa-ha), both of which are, in essence, supposed to be dynamic and open to all, were co-opted by those with political and financial power at some point in history. As the knowledge production mechanisms are now firmly rooted in both the traditional madrasahs and modern institutions of learning, serious intellectual endeavors have become largely passive and dormant. The stratification and petrification of the so-called ulama class, on the other hand, has reinforced an elite reproduction mechanism, one that hands out knowledge to the general public only as needed and only in certain forms.
But despite these adversities, several contemporary attempts have been made to return the quest for knowledge to its original raison d’être: to draw on this legacy and to emancipate the knowledge production processes so that they can once again serve the ongoing struggle to benefit humanity. IDE embraces all such attempts, regardless of when and where they were launched.
IDE believes that this quest is not something new, but only the rejuvenation of a long and ongoing attempt to approach the dominant paradigms with a critical eye. We seek to rupture the hegemony of power-driven knowledge on behalf of the weak, oppressed, and justice-seekers on every possible level. IDE thus takes its place in the ongoing historical quest for the truth. Rather than imposing a ready-made and given truth, we invite all of those who aspire to side with truth and justice to join our journey. We believe that we can guard against power’s corruptive potential if we embrace this awareness and begin acting upon it. In our opinion, only this type of approach can provide non-commodified knowledge that will benefit everyone. IDE takes no credit for this claim or insight; we are merely holding ourselves responsible for producing such knowledge in the belief that the human assets necessary for doing so exist.
For more information about who and what we are, please contact us at: [email protected]

Address

Halk Caddesi No:52 D:6
Üsküdar
34672

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when IDE Istanbul Think-House posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Shortcuts

Share

Category