Lekka Yu Lekkin

Теперь официально: книги авторов Rideró на Wildberries!

Недавно мы уже осторожно намекали, что готовим к запуску новую площадку для продажи ваших книг. И теперь можем громко заявить: готово! С июля книги, опубликованные на платформе Rideró, смогут появляться и на Wildberries. Несколько важных деталей:

1. На площадке продаются бумажные книги по технологии «печать по требованию». Роялти будет таким же, как и при продаже через другие интернет-магазины.
2. Стоимость доставки формируется так же, как при продаже других товаров через Wildberries. Ваши читатели смогут оформить бесплатную доставку до пункта выдачи.
3. Чтобы отправить новую книгу на Wildberries, нужно поставить галочку напротив соответствующего пункта во время публикации книги.
4. Уже опубликованные в Ridero книги отправятся на Wildberries автоматически. Вам для этого ничего делать не нужно.

По данным аналитиков Wildberries, за 2020 год россияне приобрели на их маркетплейсе почти 20 млн книг, что в три раза больше, чем в 2019 году, и почти в десять раз больше, чем в 2018. А значит, покупательский спрос активно растет.

Полина Бынова, директор по маркетингу сервиса Ridero: «Расширять доступную авторам аудиторию — это одна из наших ключевых задач, поэтому мы уже создали самую обширную сеть дистрибуции электронных книг в стране, и сейчас мы очень рады подключению новой площадки. Wildberries за последние несколько лет совершил настоящий прорыв на рынке ecommerce в России. Это огромный маркетплейс, на котором миллионы людей покупают товары каждый день, а теперь им доступны книги независимых авторов из нашего сервиса, а для них открыта новая аудитория».

Напоминаем, что кроме Wildberries сервис Ridero позволяет вам продавать свои книги во всех основных интернет-магазинах (Литрес, Amazon, Google Play, Ozon, Aliexpress, Bookmate и др.).

I just uploaded 'Elements of the Kopula (eventological copula) theory (English version)' to https://www.academia.edu/35218637

Elements of the Kopula (eventological copula) theory (English version)

Dear Colleagues,

I invite you to take part
(correspondence participation also possible)

in the next XVI FAMEMS 2017 Conference
on financial and actuarial mathematics and eventology multivariate statistics,
and
in the Second Discussion EOS-2016 Workshop
on eventology experience and chance and Hilbert's sixth problem
(With topics from quantum physics, probability and believability to economics, sociology, and psychology, the workshop will be intended for an interdisciplinary discussion on mathematical theories of experience and chance. Topics of discussion include the results, thoughts, and ideas on the axiomatization of the eventological theory of experience and chance in the framework of the decision of Hilbert sixth problem.)

which will be held in Krasnoyarsk
December 22 ~ 23, 2017

Org-details can be found on the site FAMEMS conference and EOS-seminar:
http://fam.conf.sfu-kras.ru/index-e.php

Proceedings of the XV FAMEMS-2016 Conference can be downloaded here:
https://www.academia.edu/34417203

Oleg Yu Vorobyev
https://sfu-kras.academia.edu/OlegVorobyev

EVENTOLOGY ~ ЭВЕНТОЛОГИЯ FAMEMS EVENTOLOGY ~ ЭВЕНТОЛОГИЯ ~ ФАМЭМС Конференция

Eventological formalism
https://www.academia.edu/34738045/

The essence of the eventological formalism in eventology, which is a constantly expanding family of universal methods, consisting now of the nominal, terraced, semi-rare, set-phenomenal and Kopula formalisms, as the eventological tools of the study of structures of dependence and generality of sets of events, is summarized in the work.

If you are interested in my work, and you have the opportunity to provide financial support for the publication of my book "Theory of experience and of chance as a theory of being," I ask you to use my PayPal account: paypal.me/EventologyTheory

Eventological formalism (English version) The essence of the eventological formalism, which is a constantly expanding family of universal methods, consisting now of the nominal, terraced, semi-rare, set-phenomenal and Kopula formalisms, as the eventological tools of the study of structures

Triangle room paradox of negative probabilities of events
https://www.academia.edu/33311319/

An improved generalization of Feynman's paradox of negative probabilities \cite{Feynman1982,Feynman1987} for observing three events is considered. This is directly related to the theory of quantum computing. Imagine a triangular room with three windows (see Fig.), where there are three chairs, on each of which a person can seat \cite{Vorobyev2001a}. In any of the windows, an observer can see only the corresponding pair of chairs. It is known that if the observer looks at a window (to make a pairwise observation), the picture will be in the probabilistic sense the same for all windows: only one chair from the observed pair is occupied with a probability of 1/2, and there are never busy or free both chairs at once. Paradoxically, existing theories based on Kolmogorov's probability theory do not answer the question that naturally arises after such pairs of observations of three events: "What is really happening in a triangular room, how many people are there and with what is the probability distribution they are sitting on three chairs?".

If you are interested in my work, and you have the opportunity to provide financial support for the publication of my book "Theory of experience and of chance as a theory of being," I ask you to use my PayPal account: paypal.me/EventologyTheory

Triangle room paradox of negative probabilities of events Triangle room paradox of negative probabilities of events https://www.academia.edu/32419497/ An improved generalization of Feynman's paradox of negative probabilities \cite{Feynman1982,Feynman1987} for observing three events which is directly

Triangle room paradox of negative probabilities of events
https://www.academia.edu/32419497/
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315794796

An improved generalization of Feynman's paradox of negative probabilities \cite{Feynman1982,Feynman1987} for observing three events. The paradox is directly related to the theory of quantum computing is considered. Imagine a triangular room with three windows (see Fig.), where there are three chairs, on each of which a person can seat \cite{Vorobyev2001a}. In any of the windows, an observer can see only the corresponding pair of chairs. It is known that if the observer looks at a window (to make a pairwise observation), the picture will be in the probabilistic sense the same for all windows: only one chair from the observed pair is occupied with a probability of 1/2, and there are never busy or free both chairs at once. Paradoxically, existing theories based on Kolmogorov's probability theory do not answer the question that naturally arises after such pairs of observations of three events: "What is really happening in a triangular room, how many people are there and with what is the probability distribution they are sitting on three chairs?".

If you are interested in my work, and you have the opportunity to provide financial support for the publication of my book "Theory of experience and of chance as a theory of being," I ask you to use my PayPal account: paypal.me/EventologyTheory

Triangle room paradox of negative probabilities of events An improved generalization of Feynman's paradox of negative probabilities [1, 2] for observing three events which is directly related to the theory of quantum computing is considered. Imagine a triangular room with three windows (see Fig. 1),

Colin Blyth's paradox : setwise vs. pairwise event preferences
https://www.academia.edu/33564755/

The pairwise independence of events does not entail their setwise independence (Bernstein's example, 1910-1917). The probability
distributions of all pairs of events do not determine the probability distribution of the whole set of events (the paradox of a triangular room
\cite[2001]{Vorobyev2007ru,Vorobyev2016famems4ru}). The pairwise preferences of events do not determine the setwise preferences of these events (Blyth's paradox, 1972). The eventological theory of setwise preferences, proposed in \cite[2007]{Vorobyev2007ru}, gives an eventual justification
and extension of the classical theory of preferences and explains Blyth's paradox (that is already well-known to Yule) by human ability to use triplewise preferences.

The fact that pairwise independence of events does not imply setwise independence of events was mentioned for the first time in the correspondence in the years 1910 to 1917 between A.A.Chuprov and A.A.Markov The bright example of the fact is attributted usually to Bernstein with reference to \cite[1946, page 48]{Bernstein1946}.

In \cite[2016]{Vorobyev2016famems4} an improved generalization of Feynman's paradox of negative probabilities \cite{Feynman1982,Feynman1987} for observing three events which is directly related to the theory of quantum computing is presented. This generalization, first proposed in \cite[2001]{Vorobyev2001a} and called the , clearly demonstrates the fact that three probability distributions of pairs of events from a given triplet are insufficient to determine the probabilistic distribution of the whole triplet of events. In other words, three pairwise (partial) probability distributions of events do not determine the triplewise (joint) probability distribution of the whole triplet of events.

In this paper, I intend to briefly show the main advantages of the new \emph{theory of setwise event preferences} developed in \cite{Vorobyev2007ru}, and at the same time to demonstrate once again the failure of the pairwise to describe the whole. A vivid example of this failure of the pairwise to describe the whole is the explanation of the eventological theory of setwise event preferences of the famous Blyth's paradox \cite[1972]{Blyth1972}.

If you are interested in my work, and you have the opportunity to provide financial support for the publication of my book "Theory of experience and of chance as a theory of being," I ask you to use my PayPal account: paypal.me/EventologyTheory

Now it's easier to send Lekka Yu Lekkin a message.

Triangle room paradox of negative probabilities of events
https://www.academia.edu/32419497/

An improved generalization of Feynman's paradox of negative probabilities \cite{Feynman1982,Feynman1987} for observing three events which is directly related to the theory of quantum computing is considered. Imagine a triangular room with three windows (see Fig.), where there are three chairs, on each of which a person can seat \cite{Vorobyev2001a}. In any of the windows an observer can see only the corresponding pair of chairs. It is known that if the observer looks at a window (to make a pair observation), the picture will be in the probabilistic sense the same for all windows: only one chair from the observed pair is occupied with a probability of 1/2, and there are never busy or free both chairs at once. Paradoxically, existing theories based on Kolmogorov's probability theory do not answer the question that naturally arises after such pairs of observations of three events: "What is really happening in a triangular room, how many people are there and with what is the probability distributi on they are sitting on three chairs?".

If you are interested in my work, and you have the opportunity to provide financial support for the publication of my book "Theory of experience and of chance as a theory of being," I ask you to use my PayPal account: paypal.me/EventologyTheory

Triangle room paradox of negative probabilities of events
https://www.academia.edu/32419497/

An improved generalization of Feynman's paradox of negative probabilities \cite{Feynman1982,Feynman1987} for observing three events which is directly related to the theory of quantum computing is considered. Imagine a triangular room with three windows (see Fig.), where there are three chairs, on each of which a person can seat \cite{Vorobyev2001a}. In any of the windows an observer can see only the corresponding pair of chairs. It is known that if the observer looks at a window (to make a pair observation), the picture will be in the probabilistic sense the same for all windows: only one chair from the observed pair is occupied with a probability of 1/2, and there are never busy or free both chairs at once. Paradoxically, existing theories based on Kolmogorov's probability theory do not answer the question that naturally arises after such pairs of observations of three events: "What is really happening in a triangular room, how many people are there and with what is the probability distributi on they are sitting on three chairs?".

If you are interested in my work, and you have the opportunity to provide financial support for the publication of my book "Theory of experience and of chance as a theory of being," I ask you to use my PayPal account: paypal.me/EventologyTheory

I think that the theory of experience and of chance that I have axiomatized can bring commercial success everywhere where a person makes decisions.

The bet on a bald
https://www.academia.edu/33154290/The_bet_on_a_bald

In work there are two more articles in the same direction:

"Postulation characterization of the theory of experience and of chance"
(On the axiomatization of the theory, the dual halves of which are the new confidence theory and the Kolmogorov theory of probability)

"Theory of co-event means: a tested-mean bra-event, possible-mean ket-event and tested-possible-mean co-event in statistical political science and ecology"

These three works complete the most difficult and most interesting stage - a brief introduction to the new theory of experience and of chance and its application, which is devoted to understanding, accustoming and turning into a routine of unusual concepts and even more unusual structures of their interactions. Next will be much easier and more boring.

An auxiliary article on the characteristic element-set labelling the Cartesian product by an arbitrary binary relation is completed

... in the process of completion of the (eventological) theory of experience and of chance