25/02/2026
The statement of the organization like “bypass organizational authority,” “disregard the directives,” and “major disruption” are serious claims and too accusatory, yet no specific details were provided to explain what actually happened which could damage our candidate’s reputation.
Accountability should go both ways, isn’t? If there were gaps like unclear guidelines which is the MAJOR ISSUE, the organization should ACKNOWLEDGE AND ADMIT THEM to demonstrate FAIRNESS and PROFESSIONALISM.
A public statement should aim to inform everyone and not to accuse without PROPER EXPLANATION.
𝗢𝗙𝗙𝗜𝗖𝗜𝗔𝗟 𝗦𝗧𝗔𝗧𝗘𝗠𝗘𝗡𝗧: 𝗗𝗜𝗦𝗤𝗨𝗔𝗟𝗜𝗙𝗜𝗖𝗔𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡 𝗡𝗢𝗧𝗜𝗖𝗘 📣
After careful deliberation and a series of meetings, the ABACUS organization has come to a difficult but necessary decision to 𝐃𝐈𝐒𝐐𝐔𝐀𝐋𝐈𝐅𝐘 𝐂𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐝𝐚𝐭𝐞 𝐍𝐨. 𝟐, 𝐆𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐬𝐢𝐬 𝐒𝐚𝐦𝐬𝐨𝐧, from 𝐀𝐁𝐀𝐂𝐔𝐒 𝐍𝐞𝐱𝐭 𝐓𝐨𝐩 𝐌𝐨𝐝𝐞𝐥 𝐒𝟑. Despite our best efforts to resolve the ongoing issue through extensive communication, the actions of the party involved have continued to 𝖻𝗒𝗉𝖺𝗌𝗌 𝗈𝗋𝗀𝖺𝗇𝗂𝗓𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖺𝗎𝗍𝗁𝗈𝗋𝗂𝗍𝗒 and 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗋𝖾𝗀𝖺𝗋𝖽 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝖽𝗂𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖾𝗌 𝗈𝖿 𝗈𝖿𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖾𝗋𝗌-𝗂𝗇-𝖼𝗁𝖺𝗋𝗀𝖾. This has caused a major disruption to event preparations and unnecessary inconvenience to our other candidates, officers, and partner organizations. To protect the integrity of the competition and the well-being of the remaining models, we must take this decisive action.
This decision was reached through a unanimous agreement by 𝐀𝐋𝐋 𝐀𝐁𝐀𝐂𝐔𝐒 𝐎𝐅𝐅𝐈𝐂𝐄𝐑𝐒 and is 𝐈𝐑𝐑𝐄𝐕𝐎𝐂𝐀𝐁𝐋𝐄. In the interest of fairness, the organization will reimburse the candidate's registration fee.
We appreciate everyone's patience and continued support as we refocus our efforts on the success of the upcoming 𝐀𝐁𝐀𝐂𝐔𝐒 𝐍𝐞𝐱𝐭 𝐓𝐨𝐩 𝐌𝐨𝐝𝐞𝐥 𝐒𝟑.
