ALAGA Review Center

HAPPENING NOW 🧠

Intensive Review for Abnormal Psychology with our Guest Lecturer, Ms. Joan! 📚✨

Current classroom status:

❌ Self-diagnosing
❌ Diagnosing classmates
❌ Diagnosing exes

✅ Learning
✅ Reviewing
✅ Becoming future RPMs

HAHAHAHA
Let's keep the energy up! 🔥
Don't miss the fun in learning with ALAGA RC.

🇵🇭 Happy Philippine Independence Day! 🇵🇭

Today, we honor the courage, sacrifice, and patriotism of the heroes who fought for our nation's freedom.

As future Psychometricians and Psychology professionals, may we continue to uphold the values of integrity, excellence, and service to our fellow Filipinos. Let us use our knowledge and skills to contribute to a stronger, more compassionate, and mentally healthy nation.

Freedom is not only a privilege—it is a responsibility. May we continue to make choices that uplift ourselves, our communities, and our country.

From your ALAGA Review Center family, we wish everyone a meaningful and patriotic Independence Day!

💙❤️💛

HAPPENING NOW! 🎉

Intensive Live Coaching Review for Developmental Psychology with Ma'am Kath!

Learning has never been this fun! 😆 Ang aga-aga, sumasakit na ang panga namin sa kakatawa sa mga bentang jokes ni Ma'am habang nagre-review. 😂

Who says review sessions have to be boring? Join us as we learn, laugh, and prepare for success together!

✨ Never miss the fun in learning!
📚 Strengthen your concepts.
🎯 Prepare for the board exam.
😄 Enjoy every session.

Join us and be an ALAGA Baby! 🐣💙

Psychological tests should measure functioning—not familiarity.

Psychological assessment carries a public responsibility. Its value depends not only on the tools used but also on the integrity of the conditions under which information is gathered, interpreted, and used.

When test materials, answer strategies, “reviewers,” or coaching tips are shared, the issue goes beyond simple preparation. These practices can affect the meaning of test scores and weaken the fairness, validity, and credibility of assessment results.

Pre-exposure, coaching, and repeated exposure may lead scores to reflect familiarity, rehearsed responding, or practice effects—not only the person’s actual psychological functioning.

This is why test security is not gatekeeping. It is part of an ethical and responsible psychological assessment. We can help people understand the purpose of assessment, but we should not teach them how to outsmart it.

The Assessment Psychology Division’s Ethical Advisory on Protecting the Integrity of Neuropsychological Test Screening and Assessment Materials firmly underscores that responsible psychological assessment must be guided by professional ethics, test security, and the standards set by RA 10029 and psychological practice in the Philippines.

We encourage practitioners, educators, and institutions to read, reflect on, and share this advisory as part of our shared responsibility to protect the integrity of psychological assessment.

Protect test integrity.
Protect the client.
Protect the profession.

FINAL CALL, FUTURE RPms! 🧠✨

Still thinking about enrolling?
This is your sign to stop overthinking and start reviewing 👀📚

⏳ Last day of enrollment: May 31, 2026
🔥 Intensive Review starts: June 6, 2026

At ALAGA Review Center, we don’t just review theories — we help build confidence, mastery, and board exam readiness 💙💚

📌 Secure your slot before enrollment closes!
📝 Registration Link: https://forms.gle/WV8vEisQKeUhtysK9

Review smart. Aim for RPm 2026.

Psychological Assessment Refresher ✅ SURVIVED. 😮‍💨📚

At dahil Psychological Assessment ‘yan… hindi pwedeng “familiar naman ako diyan” energy lang.
This session was facilitated by a licensed Psychometrician and Psychologist.

So kung naghihintay ka pa ng sign para mag-enroll… eto na ‘yon 😉
Because here at ALAGA Review Center, hindi lang review ang meron — may guidance, strategy, at matinding laban para sa RPm dream mo 💙

Missed the refresher? Don’t worry.
You can still catch up 😉

📌 Enrollment is open until May 31 only
📌 Intensive Review starts June 2026

Review smart. Review with ALAGA. 💙

🚨 READY TO TOP THE 2026 PSYCHOMETRICIAN LICENSURE EXAMINATION? 🚨

Your journey to becoming the next RPm starts here at ALAGA Review Center! 🧠✨

Join our Intensive Review Program featuring expert lecturers in:
📌 Developmental Psychology
📌 Abnormal Psychology
📌 Psychological Assessment
📌 Industrial/Organizational Psychology

Learn from experienced professionals, strengthen your foundations, and master board exam concepts through focused discussions, rationalizations, and intensive preparation sessions. 💯

📅 Intensive review sessions start this June and July 2026
🔥 Additional intensive sessions will also be offered this August 2026 for final board exam preparation!

📍 Via Zoom Meeting
⏰ 8:30 AM – 4:00 PM

Don’t just take the exam — prepare to dominate it. 🏆
Enroll now and be part of the future RPms of the Philippines! 🇵🇭

Register here: https://forms.gle/xJC4T7Loah4CBzoQ9

Abnormal Psychology Refresher ✅ DONE.

And yes… hindi lang basta lecture — this one came straight from our Top 4 in the 2025 Psychometrician Licensure Examination 🧠🔥

Kung iniisip mo pa kung ready ka na mag-review… consider this your sign 👀
Because here at ALAGA Review Center, hindi ka lang mag-aaral — you’ll learn from the best.

Missed this session? Don’t worry.
You can still get access 😉

📌 Enroll now at ALAGA Review Center
📌 Intensive Review starts June 2026

Review smart. Review with ALAGA. 💙

Expert item review is a valuable part of instrument development, particularly in examining face validity and content validity. It helps determine whether items are clear, relevant, representative, and aligned with the intended construct. However, validation should not end with a simple Retain, Remove, Revise checklist.

The concept of construct validity, formally developed by Cronbach and Meehl in the mid-1950s, was built on the premise that psychological constructs cannot be validated through item review alone. In psychological assessment, validity refers to the degree to which evidence and theory support the intended interpretation and use of test scores for a specific purpose, population, and context.

A sound validation process draws from multiple sources of evidence, including test content, response processes, internal structure, relationships with other variables, and the consequences of test use. Ultimately, the goal is not only to refine individual items, but to build a coherent validity argument that supports the meaningful and appropriate use of test scores. This is especially critical when instruments are used for high-stakes decisions, where weak validity evidence is not just a psychometric concern, but an ethical one.