11/09/2021
PNG National Unity Pillar
1. The Man and his Monument
A major argument against the Governments National Unity Pillar is why it is not spending on basic necessities. More or less the Government is an organism and a reflection of its creation and that is man. To understand Government, understand man.
To understand some rationale behind why humans build monuments for their heritage or temples for their gods, or for our matter why the Government is building a National Unity Pillar is a difficult question. Why do it? The data of man building monuments is as old as human beings have been in existence and the reason for it is essential yet a difficult one.
But consider this, is the Government the only social actor or are we also. We are guilty of attributing and thereby creating symbolism not with monuments but with words. Example, settlement is a term in our own construct that represents and reinforce lawlessness, impoverishment, drug-infestation, and chaotic area of the city, ruled by violence.
On the other end, nature parks and recreational places serves no basis for humans needs of necessity. Yet we invest millions in them and we appreciate them, and these are embedded in our consciousness as good. How did we conclude that? The answer is simple, there were a lot of social development processes that went on before we started calling these things good.
Now when we accuse the Government of being an irrational spender, are we implying that humans are rational spenders? The answer is a resounding No. We are by no means rational spenders; an average working class person spends on average K100 per fortnight for social media entertainment consumption. He invests in his appearance, lifestyle choices, and trifling entertainments and publishes it online with an appetite or dare I say a need to see his viewership likes grows. This is not a normal necessity. So no, we don’t spend for basic necessities alone as our main argument implies, we have other social, psychological and irrational comforts that have become our needs
The understanding of what a human is, does, or how he spends is complex. The assumption underlining what a human is cannot be reduce down to his basic needs of food and shelter. He is not a creature of necessity; otherwise he would be no different from animals. He is a creature of pleasures, ideologies, spirituality, of cultural constructs and etc. Simply, he is a creature of nurture and not just nature; he becomes and behaves as a product of his environment, which is the institution that governs him, the entertainment that swoons him, and the religion that inspires him.
2. The ancients understanding of monuments
Why build monuments anyway and what meanings does it convey. Let's take a look at the some old civilization.
The Egyptians Pyramids - 2630 BCE
The pyramids were an engineering feat that encapsulates the Egyptians understanding of Death and Resurrection of their Pharaohs who maintains their grandeur and divinity of their origin and even their death. The towering monument ensures loyalty and divine right to rule on its subjects.
The Greek Parthenon - 438 BCE
Parthenon became a cultural monument and symbol of the beginning of western civilization and democracy, a symbol of Greek Victory over the Eastern Civilization. The world’s dominance held by the Eastern Civilization through tyrants and kings from the Babylonians and Persians have come to an end.
Israel - Solomon’s Temple 957 BCE
The temple was not there to only host religious functions but was a place of assembly, symbol of unity, and legitimization and bonding of the people to the King.
The Roman Colosseum -80 AD
At the height of Roman glory they had around 1 million citizens in Rome. Colosseums came to symbolise and celebrate power, deterrence to political rivalry and entertainment.
All of the above civilization had monarchies ruling the people within their Kingdoms or Empire. They glorified their rulings by creating monuments of Dominance, Deterrence, Spirituality, Unity or Prosperity. It was not until the 1700s that the old world with their monarchies started crumbling down, with power transferring to people giving birth to democracies around the World. One of these great democratic countries, the United States acquired a grandiose Statue of Liberty to symbolize the end of the old World and the beginning of new, base on freedom, equality of opportunity, and inalienable dignity of the individual. No longer are people governed by kings but by elected representatives.
3. The Social-Cultural symbols
Symbols of monuments were used to evoke feelings, sentiments, expression, identity and social ideal.
The sociological question is how people internalize rules, values and ideals. Government then has to answer this question. For that, it becomes the apparatus then that creates the constitution and the institutions to ensure conformity of behavior. Monuments then are the creatures or the extension of our constitution. Our Red, Black and Gold flag is actually and legally the visible symbol of our constitution.
That is one of the main reasons that the Government creates monument, to ostentatiously publish the ideals of our constitution. The goal of our government currently with its project of monument is to develop our culture in a direction that we the people may discern values and make choices and maintain aspirations for the good of all.
The other question is not just why they are doing this, but what are they trying to oppose or be against?
Of course you all know that our culture is not just shaped by our heritage and traditions only, but by other arenas also; the Media, the Academia, the Business and the Political. These arenas have the capacity to show other possible ways of living that are outside the social norm and subvert our Christian heritage. Eg. The Media has glorified casual s*x outside of marriage since the 60s, in which man does not have to take on the responsibility to adopt a long term monogamous relationship in order to get s*xual access. Academia can promote Marxist and Socialist Ideologist. Business can tailor their activities to hedonistic pursuits and exploitations of humans. Politics can legislate abortion, LGBT outcomes and etc. All these can subvert our Christian Heritage that holds our constitution.
Our government is definitely against the above things. This is a clash of ideologies. They are not perfect but at least they are trying to set precedent now for the character and the soul of the nation. Which is more expensive, our K5 million pillar that clear shows the bible has the foundation of our constitution or the deterioration of our society through secularization (loss of religious significance) and dangerous ideologies.
Our government is also trying to minimize provincial politics in our country that might seek secession and political independence. The danger of being divided will come through perceived unfairness in resource allocation among the provinces. Some province have risk their habitat by allowing mining and LNG exploration and development while other provinces don’t. The point is perceived unfairness is real, and the Panguna crisis is an example. Our Governments intent is to try keep our provinces from dividing, because clearly come provinces don’t have natural resources and others do, yet the government’s intent is to keep them one, with fair distribution of wealth. The role of the monuments I think will be a reflection of carefully developed policies to keep us united.
Conclusion
The whole debate surrounding the National Pillar of Unity must not be viewed as spiritual phenomenon but as a sociological phenomenon. And this difference of the spiritual and the sociological is recently displayed into the idea of the designated Repentance Day; every Christians know that you don’t repent in just one day but in everyday. The Repentance Day then is sociological, and repenting everyday is spiritual.
The debate reveals one thing and that is we are not aware of the social sciences of the Government, or the studies of sociology. Sociology since its rise in the 18 century was tasked to understand the modern society behavior, utility and outcomes and improve it, and our Governments understanding of sociology is that our Christian heritage is important for our society.
The rapid erosion of our traditional forms of social cohesion, shared values, ideals and beliefs offered by our common religion cannot be left to chance to the aggressive and subvertive ideologies whether domesticand foreign, and must be saved and reinforced, whatever the cost may be, and the Government should be commended for doing that. Do we risk creating an idol from this National Unity Pillar? That depends on the strength and the exercise of our Christian heritage, and that’s the whole point, we don’t have idols because of our Christian heritage, and we must pay the price of eternal vigilance for subversive idols and ideologies, and isn’t that what our Government is doing?
I concur then that the project of National Unity Pillar has psychological and sociological significance. At least it give us chance and a moral soil to which we practice our faith and true spirituality. While others claim that the Government is spiritually ignorant, this should not be a licence for us to diminish their efforts, but collectively we can influence their effort and help our country.
Johan LOLO
Image: National Unity Pillar - PNG
08/09/2021
05/09/2021