18/07/2022
...........Manipulating Training Environments for Reality...........
I love working in the adult education space and particularly training, mentoring and developing coaches and trainers.
However I’ve always struggled with ‘role-play’ training.
For me personally it doesn’t really work. I find it uncomfortable, so a block to learning, and I guess it is the same for many adult learners.
Subsequently if our participants feel uncomfortable then they are not in a safe learning environment and therefore as trainers or coaches we are failing them.
We need to design and provide training that they can make sense of, caters to their needs and is real to them, or at least triggers a learning experience relevant to them as individuals. That’s a keystone skill for coaches or trainers in any physical training environment.
The term ‘training for reality’ is not new. It’s been around for decades in law enforcement and military circles.
Strangely, the world has changed:
When you enter the term ‘training for reality’ into a search engine, the response is mainly about augmented environments, virtual reality training and other such ‘e’ learning alternatives.
Very little, if anything, comes up about how to manipulate a training session to get close to the actual thing you are training for. To me that is strange, counterintuitive and frustrating.
Having spent over 3 decades face to face coaching and training people to deal with everything from their first sports race through to those confronting life threatening situations by the nature of their work, I understand the importance of ‘real’ training sessions.
There will be people out there that hated my sessions, questioned my motives and methods, or thought I was on some big ego trip when I was pushing their limits.
However I battled for years to bring better and more realistic training to those in law enforcement, in the hope that one day my efforts might save an officers life........Who knows? Maybe it did.
In the law enforcement world it is near impossible to re-create a real incident in training. This is due to a myriad of factors that need to be controlled.
For example learning how to apprehend a violent, drug fuelled, deranged and rapidly escalating offender, will always end up with someone being hurt, often seriously. So training for this type of scenario can only get near to reality, and not reality itself.
The problem, of course, is that people will potentially act and do differently when confronted with a real ‘fight or flight’ situation, particularly if the training they have received hasn’t reflected anything close to that reality.
However there are ways to manipulate a training environment, to replicate survival stress levels, push a trainees physical skills, force errors of judgement (i.e. learning), create cognitive dissonance, take the learner to near physical exhaustion (the reality of a life threatening encounter) and then try to complete a complex task when all their fine and complex motor skills have diminished.
One method of manipulating a training environment is to use a constraints framework or constraints led coaching approach:
This is where you constrain or alter the environment, the task or even the trainee. Creating imperfect movement, non-dominant limb use, confined spaces, equipment failure, noise distraction, transition drills & skills, time pressure, chaos & confusion and unfamiliar situations; all in an effort to build a capability within a trainee where they know what to do when they don’t know what to do.
But also being mindful of leaving the trainee with a positive learning experience, after potentially many failures (learning experiences).
This requires skilled, dedicated, knowledgeable and experienced trainers who understand human performance in volatile, uncertain, complex and ambiguous (V.U.C.A) situations.
You CANNOT replicate this type of training across some form of ‘e’ learning - it’s not a game; it’s understanding the unpredictability of a dangerous human that can only really be learned by the hands on experience, and not through an augmented reality machine.
The same applies to sport coaching:
When coaching athletes the only real way to experience competition or racing is by competing or racing. Or at the very least the training sessions are manipulated to replicate all of the volatility, uncertainty, complexity and ambiguity of racing or competing.
Otherwise the training is fake and won’t transfer to ‘game day’.
In my view a great coach or trainer should manipulate any and every opportunity they can to achieve that outcome. Constantly looking to adapt, change, vary, front-load or unload any session plan.
Noting the flexibility required, as any written pre-plan probably hasn’t survived first contact.
And always remembering to leave athletes with a positive learning experience at the end of a session, however great or small that positive experience is.
This all requires a skilled coach.
Enjoy your coaching or training delivery; be flexible, be adaptable, be creative and manipulate your training environments accordingly.
Contact me if you have a coach or trainer development need.
Foggie