Education tips for all

"Purpose of Literary Study"

The study or reading of literature ordinarily has a threefold purpose,—knowledge, pleasure, and culture. This purpose shows us both the character of the literature which should be read and the manner in which it should be read. As a rule we should read only books of recognized excellence, and read them with sympathetic intelligence. Trashy books, whatever pleasure they may give, add but little to knowledge or culture; and immoral books often leave an ineradicable stain upon the soul. Fortunately there are good books enough to satisfy every taste and supply every need.
A literary work cannot be of much use till it is understood. It is useless to read books entirely beyond our grasp. In the perusal of an author we should endeavor to enter as fully as possible into his thoughts and feelings. Our primary aim should be not to criticise but to comprehend. This is sometimes, especially for the young student, a [2]difficult task. It requires patient, painstaking labor; but in the end it brings a rich reward in profit, enjoyment, and power.

In the study of a literary classic we should aim at more than a mere intellectual apprehension of its technique and other external features. The soul should rise into sympathy with it, and feel its spiritual beauty. All literary study that falls short of this high end, however scholarly or laborious it may be, is essentially defective. The externalities of a piece of literature are comprehended in vain, unless they lead to a fuller understanding and appreciation of its spirit and life. Unfortunately, at the present time, philology and literary analysis frequently stop short of the realization of the supreme end of literary study. What should be only a means is sometimes exalted to an end ♥️✨

Very important ....

What Is Classical Economics?

Classical economics is a broad term that refers to the dominant school of thought for economics in the 18th and 19th centuries. Most consider Scottish economist Adam Smith the progenitor of the classical economic theory. However, Spanish scholastics and French physiocrats made earlier contributions. Other notable contributors to classical economics include David Ricardo, Thomas Malthus, Anne Robert Jacques Turgot, John Stuart Mill, Jean-Baptiste Say, and Eugen Böhm von Bawerk.

KEY TAKEAWAYS

Classical economic theory was developed shortly after the birth of western capitalism. It refers to the dominant school of thought for economics in the 18th and 19th centuries.
Classical economic theory helped countries to migrate from monarch rule to capitalistic democracies with self-regulation.
Adam Smith’s 1776 release of the “Wealth of Nations” highlights some of the most prominent developments in classical economics.

Understanding Classical Economics
Self-regulating democracies and capitalistic market developments form the basis for classical economics. Before the rise of classical economics, most national economies followed a top-down, command-and-control, monarch government policies system. Many of the most famous classical thinkers, including Smith and Turgot, developed their theories as alternatives to the protectionist and inflationary policies of mercantilist Europe. Classical economics became closely associated with economic, and later political, freedom.

The Rise of Classical Economic Theory
Classical economic theory was developed shortly after the birth of western capitalism and the Industrial Revolution. Classical economists provided the best early attempts at explaining capitalism's inner workings. The earliest classical economists developed theories of value, prices, supply, demand, and distribution. Nearly all rejected government interference with market exchanges preferring a looser market strategy known as "laissez-faire," or "let it be."

Classical thinkers were not completely unified in their beliefs or understanding of markets although there were notable common themes in most classical literature. The majority favored free trade and competition among workers and businesses. Classical economists wanted to transition away from class-based social structures in favor of meritocracies.

The Decline of Classical Theory
The classical economics of Adam Smith had drastically evolved and changed by the 1880s and 1890s, but its core remained intact. By that time, the writings of German philosopher Karl Marx had emerged to challenge the policy prescriptions of the classical school. However, Marxian economics made very few lasting contributions to economic theory.

A more thorough challenge to classical theory emerged in the 1930s and 1940s through the writings of British mathematician John Maynard Keynes. Keynes was a student of Alfred Marshall and admirer of Thomas Malthus. Keynes thought that free-market economies tended toward underconsumption and underspending. He called this the crucial economic problem and used it to criticize high-interest rates and individual preferences for saving. Keynes also refuted Say's Law of Markets.

Keynesian economics advocated for a more controlling role for central governments in economic affairs, which made Keynes popular with British and American politicians. After the Great Depression and World War II, Keynesianism had replaced classical and neoclassical economics as the dominant intellectual paradigm among world governments.
Real-World Example of Classical Theory in Action.

Adam Smith’s 1776 release of the Wealth of Nations highlights some of the most prominent developments in classical economics. His revelations centered around free trade and a concept called the "invisible hand" which served as the theory for the beginning stages of domestic and international supply and demand. This theory, the dual and competing forces of demand-side and sell-side move the market to price and production equilibrium. Smith’s studies helped promote domestic trade and led to more efficient and rational pricing in the product markets based on supply and demand.

Here's something I wanna share with you guys.

Yesterday, I went to the supermarket with the prudence dictated by the new normal. Mask, gel and safety distance.

I then started to get the things that were on my short list, and when I was lining up to pay, between taking the money and storing the phone, the 500 peso bill I had to pay fell on the floor, and the man who was in front of me finishing paying his purchases slowly bent down and picked up my note.

Woww, How much education and kindness in these pandemic times - I thought. I held out my hand, waiting for him to give me back my money, trying to stay away, so that he would feel safe, while preparing to thank him for the gesture.

But suddenly, what he told me was shocking - What's on the floor belongs to whoever finds it! - and just like that, he left ... naturally, as if he hadn't done anything wrong.

I looked at the lady behind me and the people next to me and they all looked at me in shock and disbelief, whispering things between them.

For a moment there, I was trying to evaluate myself. I wanted to do justice on my own ... I left my purchases, because I had no way to pay (I do not even own a credit card), and went after him to the parking lot, to have my 500.00 returned.

However, I realized that the people closest to the line came after me, curious to know what was going to happen ...

I spoke to him demanding my money but he just looked at me with contempt and acted like I was invisible.

When he got to the car, he slowly put his two shopping bags on the floor to take the key out of his pocket and open the trunk, and I thought - It's now or never!

I took the two bags and told him the same thing he had said to me - What is on the floor belongs to those who find it! - and I started running towards the exit, between fright and laughter, proud of my revenge.

The spectators started to applaud and I saw that the “smart guy” had been irritated after all, as he left the parking lot dropping security cones in his path.

I swear I felt a rush of adrenaline, fright and nervousness, but then I cried with laughter.

When I got home I opened the bags and found:
- 2 kg shrimp
- 1 kg of salmon
- ham, cheese and yogurt of two flavors
- whole grain bread
- 1 bottle of white wine
- 2 bottles of red wine
- 2 jars of strawberry jam
- 2 kg of very good quality salami
- 1 jar of mayonnaise

I had never made so many purchases with only 500.00 pesos

And now here I am ... Having a glass of wine, eating and thinking as I write - am I a vigilante or a vindictive person?

HAVE YOU READ THIS UNTIL HERE?
This obviously did not happen to me. It's just a campaign to promote reading!

Reading stimulates the mind and imagination, makes us travel to other places and even helps communication.

If you want to copy and paste and produce a smile from your friends.

Please go ahead, stimulate someone else's mind. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Reading an entire article also prevents you from becoming a victim of click bait and fake news. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

😂😂😂

No one should place you in a position you do not want. No one should force you to choose one thing only even, such as a certain college. What would make you stuck up into one thing, to know everything of one thing? No, wrong notion. The world is big and, so, do not prove to yourself you have to know everything of one thing to be good at. Personally, I believe one should know one thing of almost everything, or approximately, at least. That is not to live memorizing it always, but, to then start your own lineage of knowledge after knowing the beginning of the thread. You should know one thing of a sport's rules to then build upon it what you think should be the fair rules of it. Same with literature and art; know one thing in everything of these diverse fields to build on it your own thoughts, way to express yourself and a whole imaginative world of yours. Art taught me the freedom of expression, fully yours, not letting anyone to direct you on what to draw. Literature taught me freedom of thinking, maybe only grammar directing you, but, more than that, no, free to choose what to say totally. Sciences and Maths is kind of different, but, you should still know some of it to build on it your own thoughts. For example, science taught me the notion of theories that you should stay affirm on after fully making up your mind. It also taught me that everything is relative and nothing stands up by itself, but, give the reader freedom to understand what he wants after writing to him what you think completely. Math taught me to solve one at a time, either x or y or z before going to the next variable, until the three are taken care of in any debate. If sciences made me think more for myself, I would have indulged more in it, but, I found it controlling me, its numbers, equations and scientific theories. That is why I took a corner from it early in my life and graduated from a field in it, electronics, only to hold a high degree, bachelor's degree before being a complete free thinker. Beside, I never believed one should know everything on one thing, so, I could not jump into another field because it would still be knowing everything on one thing. I thought, also, knowing electronics would make me "invade the world" by my thoughts and being in control of my whole life, but, discovered that it controlled me like any of the sciences. It is true that a doctor should know everything of one thing to cure from diseases, but, that is only an exception.
In the end, I encourage everyone to know one thing of many things and not get stuck up with only one thing to know everything on. You are a freethinker and, so, do not let one thing control your life, because, knowing everything of one thing will control your movement and way of thinking throughout your life. Be like a bee that settles on a flower for only a certain, short time period to take its fragrance, before going to the next one to also take the best of it. That is how the bee gives out the best of it, honey

Most men don’t understand that a woman they claim to love has dismissed them long while ago from their heats without possibly showing it.

As a man, you must constantly find ways to comprehend what women admire. Ladies don’t prefer men that gives unnecessarily order to them, whether it is right or wrong.
These are some of the stuffs women appreciate but they will not tell you:

1. Gentle communication: Ladies appreciate a communication flows without arguments or anything that results in violence. No lady would condone insult or offensive words when you are having communication with her, even lifting up your baritone voice at her is entirely bad for her.

2.Talking Out What Is In Your Mind: women don’t have affection for men who conceal their emotions from them. They conclude that such men are not grown up sufficiently to take supervision of their obligations and they don’t possess the capacity to handle problems well. They appreciate seeing you sharing your emotions with good strength.

3. Attending Ears: women certainly like men to attention to them. They constantly want to chat, as a man, pay attention to whatsoever she is mumbling even if it is jargons. They enjoy chatting and you pay attention to them, it is their essence of personality.

Use these spoken words instead of Very

plss like n share the page u will get everything that u need.

Commonly confusing words

Your feet are connected to your body

What do you think on
The economic impacts of covid 19?
1. Unemployment:- because many people lost their work
2. Inflation:- we looked many goods price risen
3. Marketing problems:- it affected import and export markets in the international trade
4. The service sectors:- it affected the sectors of transportation, hotels and turisms, schools, markets