22/08/2026
When Spending to Relieve Tension Meets Contractionary Monetary Policy: Nigeriaโs Cost-of-Living Dilemma
By Dr. Felix Ijeh
Introduction
Nigeria's current macroeconomic environment presents an intriguing policy paradox. While the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) continues to maintain relatively restrictive monetary conditions to consolidate the recent decline in inflation, Nigerian householdsโparticularly those at the lower end of the income distribution are compelled to spend more simply to maintain basic consumption.
At first glance, rising household expenditure could be interpreted as evidence of stronger aggregate demand. However, such an interpretation may be misleading. Where expenditure rises because food, transportation, housing, energy and other necessities have become more expensive, increased nominal spending may reflect declining real purchasing power rather than increasing prosperity.
This distinction is critical to understanding the interaction between monetary policy, inflation and poverty in Nigeria.
Spending More, Consuming Less
Consider a household that previously spent โฆ100,000 monthly on essential goods and services. If prices increase substantially, the household may require โฆ130,000 to purchase approximately the same basket of goods.
Nominal expenditure has increased, but real consumption has not.
Indeed, if income fails to keep pace with prices, the household's welfare may actually deteriorate. The household can respond by reducing discretionary consumption, drawing down savings, borrowing, increasing informal economic activity or sacrificing expenditure on education, healthcare and other investments in human capital.
This behaviour can be described as distress consumptionโexpenditure driven primarily by the need to cope with rising living costs rather than by increased purchasing power.
The distinction between nominal expenditure and real consumption is therefore essential when interpreting Nigeria's current economic conditions.
The Monetary Policy Challenge
The CBN's monetary policy objective is understandable. Persistent inflation undermines purchasing power, complicates investment decisions, weakens savings incentives and disproportionately affects low-income households.
The CBN's current Monetary Policy Rate of 26.5 percent, alongside the recent moderation of headline inflation to about 15.91 percent, reflects a significant tightening of monetary conditions followed by cautious movement toward monetary normalisation.
The decline in inflation is encouraging. Nevertheless, lower inflation should not be confused with lower prices.
If inflation falls from 30 percent to 15 percent, prices are still increasing; they are simply increasing at a slower rate. Consequently, households that experienced substantial losses in purchasing power during the preceding inflationary period may continue to experience economic hardship even as headline inflation improves.
This explains an apparent contradiction between macroeconomic statistics and household experience: inflation can fall while the cost-of-living problem remains.
*Monetary Tightening and Household Welfare*
Contractionary monetary policy operates through several channels. Higher interest rates increase the cost of credit, reduce borrowing, moderate interest-sensitive consumption and investment, and influence inflation expectations and liquidity conditions.
However, these effects are not evenly distributed across households and firms.
High-income households may postpone discretionary expenditure when interest rates rise. Poor households have considerably less flexibility because their expenditure is concentrated on necessities.
Similarly, a large corporation with access to retained earnings or alternative financing is better positioned to withstand high borrowing costs than a small enterprise that depends heavily on bank credit.
Consequently, monetary tightening can reduce productive investment and employment without necessarily reducing expenditure on essential goods by the same magnitude.
This asymmetry presents an important policy challenge.
Monetary tightening can suppress discretionary demand faster than it suppresses subsistence demand.
The implication is not that the CBN should abandon monetary discipline. Rather, monetary policy must be complemented by policies capable of addressing the supply-side sources of inflation.
Inflation, Poverty and the Savings Trap
The poverty implications are particularly important.
When household income fails to keep pace with prices, households often draw down savings or borrow to finance essential expenditure. Over time, this weakens their financial resilience.
The process can be represented as:
Inflation leads to declining real income and then dissaving/borrowing and consequently distress consumption and weaker future financial capacity.
This creates a potential savings trap.
A household may preserve current consumption by sacrificing savings and productive assets. In the short run, this may prevent hunger or severe deprivation. In the long run, however, it reduces the resources available for education, business investment, housing and other forms of capital accumulation.
At the macroeconomic level, widespread household dissaving can weaken domestic capital formation at precisely the time Nigeria requires higher investment to accelerate economic transformation.
Why Monetary Policy Alone Is Insufficient
Nigeria's inflation problem is not exclusively a monetary phenomenon.
Food supply constraints, insecurity, transportation costs, energy costs, exchange-rate movements, logistics bottlenecks and weak domestic productive capacity can all contribute to inflationary pressures.
Monetary policy can influence aggregate demand and financial conditions, but it cannot directly produce food, repair rural roads, increase electricity generation or eliminate supply-chain bottlenecks.
This creates a strong case for closer coordination between monetary and structural economic policies.
Government expenditure should increasingly prioritise investments that expand productive capacity and reduce the cost of production. Agricultural productivity, transportation infrastructure, electricity, storage facilities, logistics and human capital are particularly important.
The objective should be to shift Nigeria's inflation problem from a persistent supply constraint toward a more productive and competitive economic structure.
The Fiscal-Monetary Policy Interface
The interaction between fiscal and monetary policy also deserves attention.
Expansionary fiscal policy may be necessary during periods of economic hardship, particularly where social protection is required. However, poorly targeted fiscal expansion can stimulate aggregate demand without a corresponding increase in productive capacity, thereby complicating the CBN's inflation-control efforts.
The issue, therefore, is not simply whether government should spend more or less.
It is what government spends on and how efficiently that expenditure expands productive capacity.
Productive public expenditure can complement monetary policy by increasing supply and reducing structural inflationary pressures. Unproductive expenditure may do the opposite.
This distinction should become central to Nigeria's macroeconomic policy framework.
*hree Possible Economic Trajectories
Nigeria's near-term economic outlook can broadly be considered under three scenarios.
1. Managed disinflation
Under the favourable scenario, inflation continues to moderate, food supply improves, exchange-rate conditions remain relatively stable and the CBN gradually eases monetary conditions.
This would support recovery in real household income, private investment and savings.
2. Persistent supply-side inflation
Under an adverse supply scenario, food, energy or exchange-rate shocks could prevent inflation from falling sufficiently. The CBN would then face pressure to maintain restrictive monetary conditions even as households and businesses experience weaker economic activity.
This could produce a difficult combination of persistent inflation and subdued growth.
3. Premature monetary easing
A rapid reduction in interest rates before inflation expectations are firmly anchored could revive liquidity and exchange-rate pressures.
Such an outcome could interrupt the disinflation process and force the CBN to tighten again later.
The challenge is therefore to determine not merely whether monetary policy should ease, but when and at what pace.
Policy Implications
Nigeria's policy response should rest on five complementary pillars.
First*, maintain monetary credibility.
The CBN should remain committed to price stability while gradually adjusting monetary conditions as inflation expectations become firmly anchored.
Second, distinguish demand-pull from supply-side inflation.
A food-supply shock should not be treated in exactly the same way as an economy experiencing excessive credit-driven demand.
Third, protect vulnerable households.
Targeted and temporary social-protection measures can prevent inflation-induced income shocks from permanently damaging human capital and productive assets.
Fourth, expand productive capacity.
Agriculture, electricity, transportation, storage, manufacturing and logistics require sustained investment if Nigeria is to achieve durable disinflation.
Fifth, strengthen domestic savings and investment.
Macroeconomic stability should ultimately encourage households to save and firms to invest rather than forcing households to consume their savings simply to survive.
Conclusion
Nigeria's current economic situation demonstrates why macroeconomic indicators must be interpreted carefully.
Rising household expenditure does not necessarily imply rising prosperity. In an inflationary environment, households may spend more simply because everything costs more.
Likewise, declining inflation does not mean that prices have returned to their previous levels.
The central economic question is therefore not merely whether Nigerians are spending more, but why they are spending more.
If expenditure is being driven by rising real income, productivity and employment, it represents economic progress. If it is driven by higher food prices, transportation costs, energy expenses, declining real wages and the erosion of savings, it represents economic distress.
The CBN's responsibility is to preserve price stability and anchor inflation expectations. Government's responsibility is to expand productive capacity, improve infrastructure and protect vulnerable households. Neither monetary policy nor fiscal policy can sustainably solve Nigeria's cost-of-living crisis in isolation.
The ultimate objective should be more ambitious than simply lowering the inflation rate.
Nigeria needs an economy in which prices are stable, productivity is rising, real incomes are expanding, households can save, firms can invest and poverty is declining.
That is the point at which macroeconomic stabilisation becomes genuine economic recovery.
I am an Economist. Economic Information is key.
Stay Informed, Stay Ahead
