16/09/2026
One of the first mistakes I see teachers make at the beginning of a new term is rushing to "start teaching" simply because the timetable says it is time to teach.
The assumption is understandable: the earlier you begin the scheme of work, the more content you will cover. But starting content immediately is not necessarily the same as starting teaching effectively.
Think about what often happens on the first day.
A teacher walks into a new class, takes attendance, introduces the subject, opens the scheme of work and begins the first topic. Students are still trying to understand the teacher's expectations, some are unsure of classroom routines, others have forgotten important concepts from the previous term, and the teacher has not yet established what the class actually knows.
Yet the lesson continues.
Then two or three weeks later, the teacher discovers that many students do not have the prerequisite knowledge for the current topic.
Now the teacher has a problem.
The problem was not that the students were incapable of learning. The teacher started from an assumption instead of evidence.
The first day should therefore not necessarily be a "full lesson" in the traditional sense.
It should be a diagnostic and orientation opportunity.
You can introduce the subject, establish expectations, explain how your lessons will work, revise important prerequisite concepts, ask probing questions, and give students a short task that reveals their current level of understanding.
For example, a Mathematics teacher may give students a few questions based on concepts they should already know. An English teacher may ask students to read a short passage and respond to questions. An Economics teacher may use a short scenario to discover whether students can apply basic economic concepts.
You are not wasting instructional time.
You are gathering information that will determine how you should teach the instructional time that follows.
There is, however, another extreme to avoid.
Some teachers spend the entire first week on introductions, rules, classroom arrangements, and revision without actually beginning meaningful academic work.
That is also ineffective.
The professional approach is not "don't teach on the first day."
It is:
Don't rush into content before establishing the conditions necessary for students to learn that content.
By the end of the first day, you should ideally know something about your students, they should understand something about you, and both sides should have a clearer understanding of how learning will happen in that classroom.
You can still introduce the first topic if the situation permits. But do not measure a successful first day by the number of pages covered.
Measure it by the quality of information you gained and the foundation you established.
Ask yourself:
If I teach my first topic on Day One, am I teaching because my students are ready for it, or because I feel I must start the scheme?
That distinction matters.
Because sometimes the most productive thing a teacher can do on the first day is not to rush to teach the content, but to first understand the learners who are supposed to learn it.
What do you think is better on the first day: start the scheme immediately, or spend some time diagnosing and preparing the class first? Why?