Dr.Fish 鱼博士 - RAS Aquaculture Specialist

Dr.Fish 鱼博士 - RAS Aquaculture Specialist Contact information, map and directions, contact form, opening hours, services, ratings, photos, videos and announcements from Dr.Fish 鱼博士 - RAS Aquaculture Specialist, Education, NO 25, Jalan PUSAT PERNIAGAAN FALIM 5, PUSAT PERNIAGAAN FALIM, IPOH, Ipoh.
(2)

RAS Aquaculture Specialist | Training & System Solutions
Learn how to build and operate high-density indoor fish & shrimp farms
✔ Beginner to commercial level
✔ Proven system & real farm experience
📩 WhatsApp us to start

RAS循环水养殖专家|教学 + 系统一站式
教你从0开至商业化

鱼身上发现【传染性癌症】
05/08/2026

鱼身上发现【传染性癌症】

主持人:Ley Teng 陈丽亭、Loh 罗辰昱精彩内容:原来是这样!宣传-《阳光天使》志工培训营影视大搜查《八八六十事...

RAS calture Patin Mas 2.2kg 金巴丁 2.2kg #水产养殖  #咸水鱼养殖  #淡水鱼养殖  #水产培训  #循环水养殖系统  #现代农业  #养殖技术    #环保养殖  #创新养殖      #鱼博士  #内...
18/07/2026

RAS calture Patin Mas 2.2kg
金巴丁 2.2kg

#水产养殖 #咸水鱼养殖 #淡水鱼养殖 #水产培训 #循环水养殖系统 #现代农业 #养殖技术 #环保养殖 #创新养殖 #鱼博士 #内循环水设计内养殖系统 #鱼菜共生

【Dr.Fish 每周文献拆解】 # 马来西亚真的粮食安全吗?当一个国家把饭碗交给国际市场很多人判断一个国家是否粮食安全,看的只是市场上有没有米、肉、鱼和蔬菜。只要超市货架还是满的,就认为粮食供应没有问题。但真正的粮食安全,不是平时有钱时可...
11/07/2026

【Dr.Fish 每周文献拆解】

# 马来西亚真的粮食安全吗?当一个国家把饭碗交给国际市场

很多人判断一个国家是否粮食安全,看的只是市场上有没有米、肉、鱼和蔬菜。

只要超市货架还是满的,就认为粮食供应没有问题。

但真正的粮食安全,不是平时有钱时可以买到多少食物,而是在战争、疫情、气候灾害、国际运输中断、令吉贬值,甚至出口国突然停止供应时,我们还有多少能力依靠自己继续生产。

一个国家可以通过进口丰富市场,却不能把人民最基本的生存完全交给国际市场。

# # 市场有食物,不等于国家有生产能力

马来西亚2024年的粮食安全指数由54.5提高至61.5,整体被评为良好表现。然而,在四个主要组成部分中,“粮食供应可得性”指数只有50.0,而且比2023年的54.3更低。

这说明马来西亚的食品可获得性和消费条件虽然有所改善,但最根本的生产与供应基础仍然存在明显弱点。

更值得警惕的是,马来西亚2024年的稻米自给率只有52.9%。

换句话说,作为人民最基本主粮的稻米,国内生产只能满足大约一半需求,其余部分仍须依靠进口。

进口本身并不是错误。

没有任何国家能够经济地生产所有食品。国际贸易可以补充本地不足、增加选择,并在正常时期平衡供应。

真正的问题是,当一个国家长期没有建立足够的本地生产能力,进口就不再只是补充,而会逐渐变成依赖。

平时看起来方便,危机发生时却可能非常脆弱。

# # 出口国首先保护自己,不会先保护进口国

粮食贸易最现实的一面,是每个国家在危机中都会优先保护自己的人民。

2023年,印度禁止出口非巴斯马蒂白米。印度是当时全球最重要的大米出口国之一,这项决定迅速扰乱国际市场。联合国粮农组织的全球大米价格指数在一个月内上涨9.8%,并达到15年来的名义高位。

部分贸易商暂停报价、重新谈判合约或保留库存,市场供应的不确定性迅速上升。

这就是高度依赖进口的风险。

当主要出口国突然限制出口时,进口国面对的问题不只是价格上涨。

即使愿意付更高的价格,也不代表一定能立即获得足够供应。

事实上,在2008年的全球粮食危机中,印度、越南等主要生产国也曾实施或加强大米出口限制。很多人记得当年亚洲大米供应紧张,容易误以为是泰国全面停止出口;但真正推动市场恐慌的,是多个出口国同时收紧供应及国际市场的连锁反应。

这些案例证明,粮食出口承诺只在正常时期最可靠。

危机发生后,出口国首先考虑的,必然是国内物价、社会稳定和本国消费者,而不是进口国的需求。

因此,粮食依赖也会转化为外交与谈判上的脆弱性。

当人民的饭碗掌握在少数供应国手中,进口国在贸易谈判、国际关系和危机协调中就更容易陷入被动。

粮食安全从来不只是农业问题。

它也是国家安全和外交自主性的问题。

# # 食品进口不断扩大,消耗的不只是金钱

马来西亚在2020年至2024年期间,平均每年的食品净进口约为RM29.9 billion。

相比之下,2010年代平均为RM16.5 billion,而2000年代平均只有RM7.2 billion。

这个增长趋势说明,马来西亚需要不断以更多资金从海外取得食品供应。

当令吉稳定、国际价格低、运输顺畅时,这套模式看起来还可以维持。

但当令吉走弱,同样数量的食品就需要付出更多马币。国际粮价上涨、海运成本增加、燃料价格变化和供应链中断,也会进一步推高进口成本。

这些成本最终不会凭空消失。

它们会通过批发、加工、运输和零售环节,传导到普通家庭的餐桌上。

政府可以暂时通过补贴、价格控制或增加进口缓解压力,但如果本地生产能力没有同步提升,这些措施只能处理症状,不能改变结构。

长期大量进口也会持续形成外汇需求。

这并不等于食品进口会直接“用尽”国家外汇储备,但当净食品进口持续扩大,国家就必须用更多外汇支付基本民生所需。若同时遇到汇率贬值或国际金融压力,粮食进口成本就会成为更明显的经济负担。

农业基础越弱,一个国家就越容易把国际价格、汇率和地缘政治风险直接输入国内。

# # 农业影响的不是一个行业,而是整个社会

农业经常被视为产值较低、回报较慢、技术含量不高的传统行业。

这种思维本身就是粮食安全最大的风险之一。

农业真正影响的,不只是农民收入。

它影响食品价格、农村就业、国家外汇、公共卫生、社会稳定、土地利用、环境管理和国家应急能力。

如果基本食物价格持续上涨,最先受到冲击的是低收入家庭。

家庭收入越低,食物支出在总开销中的比例通常越高。对收入较高者而言,米价或鱼价上涨可能只是生活成本增加;对贫困家庭而言,却可能意味着减少蛋白质摄取、购买质量较差的食物,甚至牺牲其他基本开销。

因此,粮食危机最终很容易变成民生危机。

而民生危机如果持续恶化,也可能进一步演变成社会与政治压力。

农业不是经济发展后可以被淘汰的旧产业。

它是所有工业、商业和城市生活能够正常运作的基础。

没有稳定食物供应,再先进的制造业和金融体系,也无法代替人民每天需要的一餐。

# # 青年不进入农业,未来由谁生产?

马来西亚农业面对的另一个结构性问题,是生产者老龄化和青年参与不足。

农业长期被塑造成“辛苦、低收入、没有前途”的职业。土地难取得、启动资金高、融资困难、价格不稳定、市场被中间环节控制,再加上许多生产模式仍高度依赖劳力和天气,年轻人自然不愿意进入。

过去官方资料曾指出,青年只占马来西亚农业从业者约15%。

这不只是人力不足的问题,而是一个产业的技术和知识能否延续的问题。

当老一代生产者逐渐退休,却没有足够年轻人接手,国家失去的不只是几块农地。

我们也会失去种植、养殖、育苗、病害管理、机械操作、加工和市场组织的实践能力。

粮食生产能力不是缺粮时拨款就能马上建立的。

一名专业农业或养殖人才需要多年训练;一个稳定农场需要基础设施、技术、市场和管理经验;一个成熟供应链更需要长期合作与信任。

如果平时不培养人才,危机来临时再号召年轻人进入农业,已经太迟。

国家必须让农业从“低收入体力行业”,转型为具有技术、专业、利润和社会地位的现代产业。

青年不是不愿意工作。

他们只是不愿意进入一个看不到未来、风险却全部由生产者承担的行业。

# # 马来西亚不缺政策,缺的是持续生产能力

马来西亚已经制定《国家农粮政策2021–2030》及粮食安全行动计划,政策方向包括提高生产力、应用科技、强化供应链,以及建立更具韧性的农粮系统。

问题是,粮食安全不能只停留在政策文件、短期拨款和活动口号。

真正需要建立的是能够持续生产的系统:

稳定且适合农业使用的土地;
长期水源及基础设施;
可负担的融资和保险;
种苗、饲料和农业投入品保障;
技术培训与专业人才;
收购、冷链、加工及销售网络;
以及让生产者能够合理获利的市场机制。

如果政策不断鼓励生产,但生产者每一季仍要独自承担天气、病害、价格和市场风险,农业就不会真正成为有吸引力的产业。

粮食安全不能依赖一次性的补贴。

它需要长期生产能力。

# # 水产养殖必须进入国家粮食安全战略

鱼类是马来西亚人民重要的动物蛋白来源,但海洋捕捞不可能无限增加。

近岸渔业资源受到捕捞压力、栖息地破坏、污染和气候变化影响。如果市场需求继续增长,而新增供应仍主要依赖野生捕捞或进口鱼类,国家的供应风险只会继续扩大。

因此,水产养殖不应该只是私人企业自行承担风险的商业项目。

它应该成为国家蛋白质供应和粮食安全战略的重要部分。

这不代表只要增加鱼塘或发放鱼苗,就能解决问题。

传统养殖仍然高度受到天气、水源、病害和环境变化影响。如果生产系统不稳定,即使增加养殖面积,也未必能够稳定增加产量。

国家真正需要鼓励的,是可控制、可预测、可持续及能够全年生产的现代水产养殖。

其中,循环水养殖系统RAS具有重要战略价值。

RAS能够循环利用水体、控制水质、提高生物安全、减少对外部水源的依赖,并在有限土地上进行较稳定的生产。

当然,RAS需要较高的技术、资本和能源管理能力,也不是所有地区和所有品种的唯一方案。但正因为它具有较高技术门槛,更不应该只由少数私人企业自行摸索和承担全部成本。

政府可以把现代RAS养殖纳入粮食安全基础设施,通过技术认证、示范场、低息融资、能源支持、人才培训、保险机制和稳定采购制度,建立真正具有生产能力的现代水产养殖体系。

现代水产养殖的目标,不只是让创业者有项目可做。

它应该承担国家稳定蛋白质供应的责任。

# # 粮食安全的核心,是国家还有多少选择

一个国家真正的安全,不是完全拒绝进口,也不是要求所有食物百分之百自给。

真正的粮食安全,是拥有选择权。

国际市场稳定时,我们可以进口,以获得更丰富和更具竞争力的供应。

国际市场失灵时,我们也必须拥有足够的本地生产能力,维持人民基本生活。

这才是真正的韧性。

如果平时完全依赖进口,危机发生后才寻找土地、生产者、种苗、饲料和技术,根本不可能及时建立供应。

粮食不是普通商品。

手机缺货,人们可以迟一点更换。
汽车涨价,人们可以暂时不买。
但米、蔬菜、鸡蛋、肉类和鱼,每一天都必须供应。

一个国家可以没有某些工业产品,却不能没有食物。

马来西亚要真正面对粮食安全,就必须停止把农业当成落后产业,也不能继续把进口便利误认为供应安全。

农业是民生的基础、外汇风险的缓冲、外交自主的筹码,也是国家在全球危机中最后一道防线。

粮食安全不是平时可以买到多少。

而是别人不卖的时候,我们还能生产多少。

真正强大的国家,不只是拥有购买粮食的能力。

更要拥有生产粮食的能力。

**References**

Department of Statistics Malaysia. (2026). *Preliminary Report of the Malaysia Food Security Index 2024*. DOSM.

Department of Statistics Malaysia. (2025). *Supply and Utilization Accounts: Selected Agricultural Commodities, Malaysia, 2020–2024*. DOSM.

Bank Negara Malaysia. (2025). *Economic and Monetary Review 2024: Drivers of Malaysia’s Current Account of the Balance of Payments*. BNM.

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2023). *FAO Food Price Index Declines in August*. FAO.

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2024). *Food Price Monitoring and Analysis: Regional Roundups*. FAO.

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2025). *The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2025*. FAO.

World Trade Organization. (2023). *Export Bans Drive Up Rice Prices*. WTO News Harvest.

Ministry of Agriculture and Food Security Malaysia. (2021). *National Agrofood Policy 2021–2030*. KPKM.

Ministry of Agriculture and Food Security Malaysia. (2021). *National Food Security Policy Action Plan 2021–2025*. KPKM.

Ministry of Agriculture and Food Security Malaysia. (2021). *Nurturing the Next Generation of Young Agropreneurs*. KPKM.

作者:陈丰裕(Ryan Tan Hong Joo)
RAS环保科技养殖专家|Dr.Fish创办人

#马来西亚粮食安全 #粮食安全 #国家粮食安全 #农业发展 #现代农业 #本地生产 #减少进口依赖 #粮食自主 #民生经济 #外汇压力 #青年农业 #农业科技 #水产养殖 #现代化养殖 #可持续发展 #食品供应 #农粮产业 #每周文献拆解

🐟 **宝石鲈鱼苗出售!**现有多种规格可选:5–5.5寸、6.6–7.5寸、7.5–8.5寸、9–10寸。适合养殖户及创业者,欢迎咨询详情。📞 Ryan:012-7174119 #宝石鲈  #鱼苗  #宝石鲈苗
07/07/2026

🐟 **宝石鲈鱼苗出售!**

现有多种规格可选:
5–5.5寸、6.6–7.5寸、7.5–8.5寸、9–10寸。

适合养殖户及创业者,欢迎咨询详情。
📞 Ryan:012-7174119

#宝石鲈 #鱼苗 #宝石鲈苗

宝石鲈苗出售
07/07/2026

宝石鲈苗出售

UTM实习生为期3个月的企业实习结束了 #水产养殖  #咸水鱼养殖  #淡水鱼养殖  #水产培训  #循环水养殖系统  #现代农业  #养殖技术    #环保养殖  #创新养殖
06/07/2026

UTM实习生为期3个月的企业实习结束了

#水产养殖 #咸水鱼养殖 #淡水鱼养殖 #水产培训 #循环水养殖系统 #现代农业 #养殖技术 #环保养殖 #创新养殖

【Dr.Fish Weekly Literature Insight】 # Black Soldier Fly Is Not a “Magic Feed”: The Wrong Ratio Can Turn an Eco-Friendly ...
02/07/2026

【Dr.Fish Weekly Literature Insight】

# Black Soldier Fly Is Not a “Magic Feed”: The Wrong Ratio Can Turn an Eco-Friendly Ingredient into an Aquaculture Risk

In recent years, black soldier fly has become one of the most widely discussed alternative protein ingredients in aquaculture feed.

Black soldier fly larvae can grow on selected agricultural by-products and organic resources, converting low-value materials into insect protein, oil, and frass. From a circular economy perspective, this creates real potential to reduce organic waste, produce alternative protein, and lower dependence on fishmeal.

Black soldier fly larvae also contain relatively high levels of protein and several essential amino acids, which is why they are increasingly considered a possible fishmeal replacement.

However, this has also created a common misunderstanding:

If black soldier fly is high in protein and environmentally friendly, does that mean more is always better?

The answer is no.

The value of a feed ingredient cannot be judged only by its crude protein content. What truly determines the result is digestible protein, amino acid balance, fatty acid composition, palatability, chitin level, and the ability of different fish and shrimp species to utilise the ingredient.

Black soldier fly has strong potential, but it is not a “magic feed.”

When the ratio is wrong, even an environmentally friendly ingredient may suppress growth, reduce feed efficiency, and increase production risk.

# # Fishmeal Replacement Ratio

When discussing black soldier fly, it is important to distinguish between the fishmeal replacement rate and the actual inclusion level in the total diet.

“Replacing 30% of fishmeal” does not mean that black soldier fly meal makes up 30% of the complete feed.

It means that black soldier fly is used to replace 30% of the fishmeal, or fishmeal protein, originally included in the formulation.

For example, if a diet originally contains 20% fishmeal, replacing 30% of that fishmeal does not mean the final diet contains 30% black soldier fly meal.

The actual inclusion level depends on the original fishmeal level, the protein concentration of the black soldier fly ingredient, dietary energy, and the overall nutrient balance of the formulation.

Therefore, the effectiveness of black soldier fly cannot be evaluated by looking at a single percentage.

Several questions must be made clear:

How much fishmeal was replaced?
What percentage of the complete diet is black soldier fly?
Were protein and energy levels kept consistent?
Were essential amino acids and fatty acids rebalanced?

Current studies on fish and shrimp suggest that, under properly formulated conditions, replacing approximately 25% to 30% of fishmeal can maintain acceptable growth and feed utilisation in some species. Certain studies have also reported potential benefits for immunity or intestinal health.

However, the results are not always consistent.

Species, body size, production stage, basal diet, and black soldier fly quality can all affect the outcome.

Some aquatic animals can tolerate higher replacement levels, while others show reduced growth or poorer feed conversion as the replacement rate increases.

For this reason, 30% should not be treated as a universal standard.

It is a reference level that must still be validated through nutritional formulation and feeding trials.

# # The Double-Edged Nature of Chitin

One major difference between black soldier fly and fishmeal is the presence of chitin in the insect exoskeleton.

Chitin is not necessarily harmful.

At an appropriate level, chitin and its derivatives may stimulate certain immune responses, influence gut microbiota, and provide functional benefits.

However, chitin may also become one of the main limitations when black soldier fly is used at high levels.

When dietary chitin becomes excessive, it may interfere with the digestion and release of protein, fat, and other nutrients. It may also increase the digestive burden on the intestine and reduce overall nutrient utilisation.

Some fish and crustaceans possess a certain level of chitinase activity and can process limited amounts of chitin.

But being able to handle some chitin does not mean they can consume unlimited quantities.

As the replacement level of black soldier fly increases, chitin intake also rises. Once this exceeds the digestive and adaptive capacity of the animal, nutrient digestibility may decline, feed conversion may worsen, and growth may eventually be suppressed.

This is why a high protein value on the feed label does not guarantee that all of that protein can be fully utilised.

What matters is not only how much crude protein is present, but how much the fish or shrimp can actually digest and absorb.

# # Fish and Shrimp Cannot Use the Same Ratio

Different aquatic animals do not respond to black soldier fly in the same way.

Omnivorous fish usually have broader dietary adaptability and may tolerate alternative proteins more effectively.

Some studies on tilapia have shown that a certain proportion of fishmeal can be replaced by black soldier fly without significantly affecting growth, provided that the diet is nutritionally rebalanced.

However, the same replacement level cannot simply be applied to carnivorous fish.

Carnivorous species generally have greater requirements for high-quality animal protein, essential amino acids, palatability, and long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids.

If fishmeal is reduced and black soldier fly is increased without reformulating the entire diet, growth and feed efficiency may be affected.

Shrimp also require a different formulation approach.

Although shrimp naturally consume animal matter containing chitin, they still require a complete balance of amino acids, fatty acids, cholesterol, phospholipids, minerals, and energy.

Some studies on Pacific white shrimp have shown that moderate replacement of fishmeal with black soldier fly can maintain growth and may improve certain intestinal and immune indicators.

However, as the replacement level increases, nutritional balance, digestive capacity, and long-term growth performance must still be carefully evaluated.

Black soldier fly can therefore be used in both fish and shrimp diets, but not at the same ratio and not with the same formulation logic.

# # What Black Soldier Fly Eats Determines What Fish and Shrimp Eventually Receive

The ability of black soldier fly to utilise various organic resources is one of its strongest advantages.

But the fact that black soldier fly can consume many materials does not mean that every material is suitable for producing feed-grade insects.

The substrate used to rear black soldier fly larvae directly affects the final protein, fat, mineral, fatty acid, and sanitary quality of the insect biomass.

Even when two products are both labelled as black soldier fly meal, significant differences may exist between producers, substrates, and production batches.

If substrate control is poor, risks may include pathogenic microorganisms, pesticide residues, mycotoxins, heavy metals, and other contaminants.

Black soldier fly can convert organic material into insect biomass, but it cannot automatically convert every unsafe substance into safe nutrition.

Some contaminants may be metabolised.

Some may be excreted.

Others may accumulate in the insect body.

Therefore, black soldier fly intended for commercial aquaculture feed must come from controlled production systems with stable substrate sources, contaminant testing, microbial control, batch nutrient analysis, and product traceability.

If the ingredient is inconsistent, the formulation will also become inconsistent.

If the formulation is inconsistent, growth and production performance will be difficult to maintain.

# # It Can Become a Major Protein Source, but Only with Strict Formulation

Black soldier fly is not limited to being a minor functional additive.

In suitable species and carefully formulated diets, it has the potential to become one of the major protein sources and replace a substantial portion of fishmeal.

However, using it at a high level requires more than simply exchanging fishmeal for insect meal.

Fishmeal has been widely used for decades not only because it is high in protein.

It generally offers good digestibility, a relatively complete essential amino acid profile, high palatability, and useful levels of fatty acids, minerals, and other nutritional components.

Black soldier fly is not a complete nutritional copy of fishmeal.

If fishmeal is substantially reduced, the formulation must be rebalanced with other protein sources, supplemental amino acids, suitable oils, vitamins, minerals, and other nutrients.

Otherwise, what is lost may not only be fishmeal.

The original nutritional structure of the entire diet may also be disrupted.

Commercial use of black soldier fly is therefore not about mixing insect meal into an existing feed.

It requires redesigning the full formulation according to the nutritional needs of the target fish or shrimp.

# # The Future May Depend on Compound Insect Proteins Rather Than a Single Insect Source

If the goal is only to reduce part of the fishmeal, black soldier fly already has considerable potential.

However, if the objective is to reduce fishmeal dependence much further, or to make insect protein a major animal protein source, relying on black soldier fly alone may still present limitations.

Different insect ingredients have different nutritional strengths.

Some offer better essential amino acid profiles.
Some contain more fat.
Some have stronger palatability.
Some contain less chitin.
Others provide different functional nutrients.

For this reason, the future may not lie in finding one “perfect insect” that fully copies fishmeal.

A more practical direction may be to combine multiple insect proteins with plant proteins, microbial proteins, algae, and precise amino acid supplementation to create a more complete protein system.

Compound insect protein does not simply mean mixing several insect meals together.

It should be formulated according to nutritional complementarity:

One ingredient may correct the amino acid limitations of another.
Different sources may reduce the chitin pressure from relying on one insect alone.
Palatability and digestibility may be improved.
Batch variation may be reduced.
Supply and price risks may be distributed.

Fishmeal is a highly concentrated ingredient with a complex nutritional profile.

Replacing it further is unlikely to depend on a simple one-to-one substitution with a single alternative ingredient.

In the long term, compound insect proteins may become one of the most practical pathways for reducing fishmeal dependence.

But whether one insect source or several are used, the final result still depends on scientific formulation and aquaculture validation.

# # Sustainability Cannot Replace Science

Black soldier fly has genuine circular economy value and may help aquaculture reduce its dependence on fishmeal.

However, sustainability only explains why the ingredient deserves to be studied.

It does not prove that the ingredient is suitable at every inclusion level.

The true value of any feed ingredient must ultimately be judged through growth performance, feed conversion ratio, digestibility, health status, product quality, cost, and long-term production stability.

When the ratio is appropriate, the formulation is complete, and the source is safe, black soldier fly can become a valuable alternative protein.

When only crude protein is considered and the replacement rate is increased blindly, chitin, nutritional imbalance, poor palatability, and ingredient inconsistency may turn an environmentally friendly ingredient into a new production risk.

Black soldier fly is not a magic feed.

It is a feed ingredient that must be understood, calculated, and used correctly.

Professional aquaculture does not adopt a new ingredient simply because it is popular.

It first asks:

Which fish or shrimp species is it suitable for?
At which production stage should it be used?
How much fishmeal can it replace?
Is the chitin level too high?
Has the formulation been nutritionally rebalanced?
Is long-term growth stable?
Is the ingredient source safe and traceable?

At the right ratio, black soldier fly can help aquaculture reduce fishmeal dependence.

At the wrong ratio, even a sustainable ingredient may suppress growth, reduce efficiency, and increase production costs.

The real objective of future aquaculture feed should not simply be to use less fishmeal.

It should be to reduce pressure on marine resources while still providing fish and shrimp with complete nutrition that they can truly digest, absorb, and utilise.

**References**

Gougbedji, A., Detilleux, J., Lalèyè, P. A., & Francis, F. (2022). Can insect meal replace fishmeal? A meta-analysis of the effects of black soldier fly on fish growth performances and nutritional values. *Animals, 12*(13), 1700.

Tippayadara, N., Dawood, M. A. O., Krutmuang, P., Hoseinifar, S. H., Doan, H. V., & Paolucci, M. (2021). Replacement of fish meal by black soldier fly (*Hermetia illucens*) larvae meal: Effects on growth, haematology, and skin mucus immunity of Nile tilapia, *Oreochromis niloticus*. *Animals, 11*(1), 193.

Chen, Y., et al. (2021). Evaluation of dietary black soldier fly larvae meal on growth performance, intestinal health, and susceptibility to *Vibrio parahaemolyticus* in Pacific white shrimp, *Litopenaeus vannamei*. *Frontiers in Marine Science, 8*, 706463.

Li, X., et al. (2022). Replacing dietary fish meal with defatted black soldier fly larvae meal affected growth, digestive physiology and muscle quality of juvenile largemouth bass. *Frontiers in Physiology, 13*, 855957.

Oteri, M., et al. (2021). Black soldier fly larvae meal as an alternative to fish meal for aquaculture feed. *Sustainability, 13*(10), 5447.

Yamamoto, F. Y., et al. (2022). Dietary fishmeal replacement by black soldier fly larvae meals produced from different substrates: Nutrient composition and performance in red drum. *Aquaculture*.

Radhakrishnan, G., et al. (2023). Evaluation of black soldier fly larvae meal as a functional feed ingredient in Atlantic salmon. *Frontiers in Aquaculture, 2*, 1239402.

Dîrvariu, L., et al. (2025). Feed sources for sustainable aquaculture: Black soldier fly meal and its effects on fish growth, feed efficiency, and product quality. *Fishes, 10*(9), 464.

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2024). *The Black Soldier Fly Revolution in Support of Waste Reduction, Food Security and Water Conservation*. FAO.

Author: Ryan Tan Hong Joo
RAS Eco-Tech Aquaculture Expert | Dr.Fish Founder

#鱼博士每周文献拆解
#鱼博士 #陈丰裕
#环保养殖 #科技养殖 #循环水养殖系统
#养鱼 #养虾 #鱼菜共生

【Dr.Fish 每周文献拆解】 # 黑水虻不是“神奇饲料”:用错比例,环保原料也可能变成养殖风险近年来,黑水虻成为水产饲料行业备受关注的替代蛋白原料。黑水虻幼虫能够利用部分农业副产品和有机资源生长,并将这些低价值原料转化为昆虫蛋白、油脂和...
26/06/2026

【Dr.Fish 每周文献拆解】

# 黑水虻不是“神奇饲料”:用错比例,环保原料也可能变成养殖风险

近年来,黑水虻成为水产饲料行业备受关注的替代蛋白原料。

黑水虻幼虫能够利用部分农业副产品和有机资源生长,并将这些低价值原料转化为昆虫蛋白、油脂和虫粪肥料。从循环经济角度来看,它确实具有减少有机废弃物、生产替代蛋白及降低鱼粉依赖的潜力。

黑水虻幼虫具有较高的蛋白质含量,也含有多种必需氨基酸,因此常被视为水产饲料中替代鱼粉的重要选择。

但市场上也容易产生一种误解:

既然黑水虻蛋白质高,又具有环保价值,是不是添加得越多越好?

答案并不是这样。

一种原料是否适合鱼虾,不能只看粗蛋白含量。真正决定养殖效果的,是可消化蛋白、氨基酸平衡、脂肪酸组成、适口性、几丁质水平,以及不同鱼虾对原料的利用能力。

黑水虻有潜力,但不是“神奇饲料”。

比例用错,再环保的原料也可能抑制生长、降低饲料效率,最终增加养殖风险。

# # 替代鱼粉比例

讨论黑水虻时,必须先分清“鱼粉替代率”和“饲料添加量”是两个不同概念。

“替代30%鱼粉”并不代表在总饲料中加入30%的黑水虻粉,而是指用黑水虻原料替代原配方中30%的鱼粉或鱼粉蛋白。

例如,一份饲料原本含有20%的鱼粉,替代其中30%,并不等于最终配方含有30%的黑水虻粉。实际添加量还取决于鱼粉用量、黑水虻蛋白含量、能量水平以及整个配方的营养平衡。

因此,评价黑水虻的使用效果,不能只看一个百分比,还必须明确:

替代了多少鱼粉;
黑水虻占总饲料多少;
饲料蛋白质和能量是否保持一致;
必需氨基酸和脂肪酸是否重新平衡。

现有鱼类和虾类研究显示,在适当配方条件下,以黑水虻替代约25%至30%的鱼粉,部分物种仍可维持良好的生长和饲料利用表现,有些研究也观察到免疫或肠道健康方面的潜在益处。

但是,研究结果并不完全一致。

不同鱼虾品种、规格、养殖阶段、基础配方和黑水虻原料品质,都会影响最终结果。有些物种能够接受较高替代率,有些则在替代比例提高后出现生长下降或饲料转化率变差。

因此,30%不能被视为适用于所有鱼虾的固定标准。

它只是一个需要通过营养配方和养殖试验验证的参考水平。

# # 几丁质的双面性

黑水虻与鱼粉之间一个重要差异,是昆虫外骨骼中含有几丁质。

几丁质不一定完全有害。

在适当水平下,几丁质及其衍生物可能刺激部分免疫反应、影响肠道微生物组成,并产生一定的功能性价值。

但几丁质也可能成为限制黑水虻高比例使用的关键因素。

当饲料中的几丁质含量过高时,可能影响蛋白质、脂肪及其他营养物质的消化和释放,增加肠道消化负担,并降低整体营养利用率。

部分鱼类和甲壳类具有一定的几丁质酶活性,能够处理部分几丁质,但这不代表它们可以无限摄入。

当黑水虻替代比例持续提高,几丁质摄入量也会增加。超过动物的消化和适应能力后,可能出现消化率下降、饲料转化效率变差,甚至生长受到抑制。

因此,黑水虻蛋白含量高,并不代表所有蛋白都能够被鱼虾充分利用。

真正重要的不是饲料中含有多少粗蛋白,而是鱼虾最终能够消化和吸收多少。

# # 鱼和虾不能使用同一个比例

不同水产动物对黑水虻的接受能力并不相同。

杂食性鱼类通常具有较广的食物适应能力,对替代蛋白的接受程度可能相对较高。部分罗非鱼研究显示,在营养重新平衡的条件下,黑水虻可以替代一定比例的鱼粉,而不明显影响生长表现。

但是,同样的比例不能直接套用在肉食性鱼类身上。

肉食性鱼类通常对优质动物蛋白、必需氨基酸、适口性和长链多不饱和脂肪酸有更高要求。如果只是简单减少鱼粉、增加黑水虻,而没有重新设计配方,生长和饲料效率可能受到影响。

虾类虽然会摄食天然含几丁质的动物性食物,但同样需要完整的氨基酸、脂肪酸、胆固醇、磷脂、矿物质和能量平衡。

部分南美白对虾研究显示,以黑水虻适量替代鱼粉,可以维持生长,并可能改善部分肠道和免疫指标。但当替代比例提高时,仍必须关注营养平衡、消化能力和长期生长表现。

所以,黑水虻可以用于鱼类和虾类饲料,但不能使用完全相同的比例和配方逻辑。

# # 黑水虻吃什么,决定鱼虾最后吃到什么

黑水虻能够利用多种有机资源,是它的重要优势。

但“能够吃”并不代表“任何原料都适合用来生产饲料级黑水虻”。

黑水虻幼虫的培养基,会直接影响虫体的蛋白质、脂肪、矿物质、脂肪酸组成及卫生品质。即使同样是黑水虻粉,不同生产厂、不同培养基和不同批次之间,也可能出现明显差异。

如果培养基来源缺乏控制,还可能涉及病原微生物、农药残留、霉菌毒素、重金属或其他污染物风险。

黑水虻可以把有机物转化为昆虫生物质,但不会自动把所有不安全物质转化成安全营养。

部分污染物可能被代谢,部分可能被排出,也有部分可能在虫体中累积。

因此,商业水产饲料所使用的黑水虻原料,必须具备稳定的培养基来源、污染物检测、微生物控制、批次营养分析及产品追溯系统。

原料不稳定,配方就难以稳定;配方不稳定,鱼虾的生长表现也难以稳定。

# # 可以成为主要蛋白来源,但必须严格配方

黑水虻不仅可以作为少量功能性原料。

在适合的物种和经过严格设计的配方中,它确实有潜力成为主要蛋白来源之一,并替代相当部分的鱼粉。

但高比例使用的前提,不是简单地把鱼粉换成虫粉,而是重新设计整个配方。

鱼粉长期被广泛使用,不只是因为蛋白质含量高。它通常还具有良好的消化率、较完整的必需氨基酸组成、较高适口性,并能提供部分脂肪酸、矿物质和其他营养成分。

黑水虻并不是鱼粉的完整复制品。

如果大幅减少鱼粉,就必须通过其他蛋白原料、氨基酸补充、油脂来源和微量营养素,把原有配方重新平衡。

否则,表面上替代的是鱼粉,实际失去的可能是整个配方原有的营养结构。

商业化使用黑水虻,不是把虫粉直接混进原来的饲料,而是根据鱼虾的营养需求,重新设计一份完整配方。

# # 未来需要复合昆虫蛋白,而不是依赖单一虫源

如果目标只是部分减少鱼粉,黑水虻本身已经具有很大潜力。

但如果要进一步降低鱼粉依赖,甚至让昆虫蛋白承担更主要的动物蛋白功能,仅依靠单一黑水虻可能仍有局限。

不同昆虫原料具有不同优势。

有些昆虫的必需氨基酸组成较好;
有些脂肪含量较高;
有些适口性更强;
有些几丁质水平较低;
有些则具有不同的功能性营养成分。

因此,未来更可行的方向,可能不是寻找一种能够完全复制鱼粉的“完美昆虫”,而是通过复合昆虫蛋白,结合植物蛋白、微生物蛋白、藻类及精准氨基酸补充,建立更完整的蛋白体系。

复合昆虫蛋白也不是简单地把几种虫粉混在一起,而是根据每种原料的营养特点进行互补:

改善必需氨基酸平衡;
降低单一原料的几丁质压力;
提高适口性和消化率;
减少批次波动;
分散原料供应和价格风险。

鱼粉是一种营养结构复杂的原料,要进一步取代鱼粉,通常不能只依靠一种替代原料进行一对一置换。

从长期发展来看,复合昆虫蛋白可能是进一步降低鱼粉依赖的重要途径,但最终仍必须通过科学配方和养殖验证。

# # 环保不能取代科学

黑水虻具有循环经济价值,也可能帮助水产养殖减少对鱼粉的依赖。

但环保只说明这种原料值得研究,并不代表它在任何比例下都适合鱼虾。

一种原料真正的价值,最终必须通过生长表现、饲料转化率、消化率、健康状况、产品品质、成本及长期稳定性来判断。

比例适合、配方完整、来源安全,黑水虻可以成为具有价值的替代蛋白。

如果只看粗蛋白,盲目提高替代比例,几丁质、营养不平衡、适口性和原料波动,就可能把环保原料变成新的养殖风险。

黑水虻不是神奇饲料。

它是一种必须被理解、计算和正确使用的饲料原料。

真正专业的养殖,不是看到一种新原料就大量使用,而是先确认:

适合什么鱼虾;
适合什么养殖阶段;
可以替代多少鱼粉;
几丁质是否过高;
营养是否重新平衡;
长期生长是否稳定;
原料来源是否安全。

用对比例,黑水虻可以帮助养殖业减少鱼粉依赖。

用错比例,再环保的原料,也可能抑制生长、降低效率,最终增加养殖成本。

未来水产饲料真正要追求的,不只是鱼粉越来越少,而是在降低海洋资源压力的同时,仍能为鱼虾提供真正可以消化、吸收和利用的完整营养。

**References**

Gougbedji, A., Detilleux, J., Lalèyè, P. A., & Francis, F. (2022). Can insect meal replace fishmeal? A meta-analysis of the effects of black soldier fly on fish growth performances and nutritional values. *Animals, 12*(13), 1700.

Tippayadara, N., Dawood, M. A. O., Krutmuang, P., Hoseinifar, S. H., Doan, H. V., & Paolucci, M. (2021). Replacement of fish meal by black soldier fly (*Hermetia illucens*) larvae meal: Effects on growth, haematology, and skin mucus immunity of Nile tilapia, *Oreochromis niloticus*. *Animals, 11*(1), 193.

Chen, Y., et al. (2021). Evaluation of dietary black soldier fly larvae meal on growth performance, intestinal health, and susceptibility to *Vibrio parahaemolyticus* in Pacific white shrimp, *Litopenaeus vannamei*. *Frontiers in Marine Science, 8*, 706463.

Li, X., et al. (2022). Replacing dietary fish meal with defatted black soldier fly larvae meal affected growth, digestive physiology and muscle quality of juvenile largemouth bass. *Frontiers in Physiology, 13*, 855957.

Oteri, M., et al. (2021). Black soldier fly larvae meal as an alternative to fish meal for aquaculture feed. *Sustainability, 13*(10), 5447.

Yamamoto, F. Y., et al. (2022). Dietary fishmeal replacement by black soldier fly larvae meals produced from different substrates: Nutrient composition and performance in red drum. *Aquaculture*.

Radhakrishnan, G., et al. (2023). Evaluation of black soldier fly larvae meal as a functional feed ingredient in Atlantic salmon. *Frontiers in Aquaculture, 2*, 1239402.

Dîrvariu, L., et al. (2025). Feed sources for sustainable aquaculture: Black soldier fly meal and its effects on fish growth, feed efficiency, and product quality. *Fishes, 10*(9), 464.

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2024). *The Black Soldier Fly Revolution in Support of Waste Reduction, Food Security and Water Conservation*. FAO.

作者:陈丰裕(Ryan Tan Hong Joo)
RAS环保科技养殖专家|Dr.Fish创办人

#黑水虻 #鱼粉 #鱼博士每周文献拆解
#鱼博士 #陈丰裕
#环保养殖 #科技养殖 #循环水养殖系统
#养鱼 #养虾 #鱼菜共生

25/06/2026
【Dr.Fish Weekly Literature Insight】 # The Cost of Overfishing: Today We Are Taking More Than Fish — We Are Taking the Fu...
22/06/2026

【Dr.Fish Weekly Literature Insight】

# The Cost of Overfishing: Today We Are Taking More Than Fish — We Are Taking the Future of Our Oceans

When people hear the term “overfishing,” their first reaction is often simple:

Will there still be enough fish for us to eat in the future?

But the true cost of overfishing goes far beyond the amount of fish caught today.

What we are removing is not only fish.

We are also removing the reproductive capacity of fish populations, the stability of marine food webs, and the ability of the ocean ecosystem to recover.

Marine resources are not unlimited.

Fish need time to grow, reach maturity, reproduce, and replenish their populations. Once fishing pressure continues to exceed the natural recovery rate of fish stocks, even the richest fishing grounds will gradually lose their productivity.

According to the latest global assessment by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, a significant proportion of the world’s marine fish stocks remain overfished. This shows that overfishing is not limited to one country, one species, or one fishing ground. It is a global challenge facing marine ecosystems around the world.

The problem is that fishery decline rarely happens suddenly.

It usually begins with changes that seem small or easy to ignore.

Large fish that were once common become increasingly difficult to find.

Fishermen need to travel farther, spend more time at sea, and consume more fuel just to obtain a catch similar to what they achieved in the past.

Fish may still appear abundant in the market, but their average size becomes smaller, species composition begins to change, and the proportion of juvenile or lower-value fish increases.

This does not necessarily mean the ocean is still healthy.

In many cases, it may indicate that large mature fish have already declined, and fishing activity is shifting toward smaller species, earlier-maturing fish, or species lower in the food chain.

# # Removing Large Fish Means More Than Losing One Fish

Large and mature fish play an extremely important role in both reproduction and ecosystem stability.

They do not merely produce more eggs. In some species, larger females can also produce offspring with better survival potential.

When fishing activity continuously removes the largest individuals from a population, the remaining fish tend to become younger and smaller. Over time, the reproductive strength of the entire population may decline.

This is why overfishing cannot be judged only by asking how many tonnes of fish were landed this year.

Even if total catch has not yet fallen sharply, the age structure, size structure, and reproductive foundation of the fish population may already be deteriorating.

When fish are caught before they have the opportunity to reproduce, the next generation cannot adequately replace them.

Today, what is removed may appear to be only one fish.

But what is truly lost may be the reproductive potential of thousands of future fish.

# # When the Food Web Becomes Unbalanced, More Than One Species Is Lost

Marine ecosystems are not built around isolated species.

Large predators, small fish, crustaceans, zooplankton, benthic organisms, seagrass, coral reefs, and phytoplankton are all connected through complex feeding and competitive relationships.

When large predatory fish are heavily removed, the consequence is not simply that one type of large fish becomes less common.

The prey species they once controlled may increase rapidly. Those prey species may then consume more organisms at lower trophic levels, creating a chain reaction throughout the ecosystem.

This process is known as a trophic cascade.

When predators decline, smaller consumers may expand in number. These consumers may then place greater pressure on lower-level organisms, eventually altering the structure of seabeds, seagrass meadows, coral reefs, and other marine habitats.

In other words, humans are not removing an isolated species.

We are removing a key component of an interconnected ecological network.

When one important component continues to decline, the balance among many other species can also be disrupted.

When fishing pressure remains focused on large, high-trophic-level fish, fisheries may gradually shift toward species lower in the food chain.

The market may still receive fish, but the structure of the marine food web may already be changing.

The real danger is not simply that one species becomes more expensive.

The real danger is that one day, the ecosystem may no longer be able to return to its original condition.

# # Malaysia Is Not Exempt from This Problem

Malaysia has extensive marine waters, and seafood is an important part of the national diet.

Capture fisheries are also closely linked to the livelihoods of coastal communities and traditional fishermen.

However, having abundant marine resources does not mean those resources can be harvested without limits.

In Malaysia, some coastal waters are already facing multiple pressures, including intensive fishing activity, habitat degradation, marine pollution, and increasing seafood demand.

Official fisheries information in Malaysia has also identified overfishing, habitat destruction, and high consumption pressure as important factors affecting fish resources and marine ecosystem balance.

For coastal fishermen, resource decline is not merely an environmental slogan.

When large fish become less common in nearshore areas, fishermen may need to travel farther, work longer hours, and spend more on fuel simply to maintain their income.

Operating costs increase.

Safety risks increase.

Yet the catch does not always improve.

The pressure is therefore carried not only by the ocean, but also by the people who depend most directly on it.

If fishery resources continue to decline, larger commercial vessels may still have the capacity to travel farther in search of fish.

Small-scale traditional fishermen often do not have the same capital, vessel capacity, or equipment.

Overfishing is therefore not only an ecological problem.

It is also a social and livelihood problem.

As resources decline, competition becomes more intense.

And the first people to feel the impact are often the small-scale fishermen who depend most heavily on coastal resources.

# # Fishing Is Necessary, but the Ocean Must Be Given Time to Recover

We cannot simply say that humans should stop fishing completely.

Fishing has always been an important source of food, culture, income, and livelihood.

Wild capture fisheries will remain necessary in the future.

But being necessary does not mean being unlimited.

The real question is not whether we should fish.

The real question is whether fishing pressure has exceeded the natural recovery capacity of the ecosystem.

When scientific assessments show that a fish population is under excessive pressure, reducing fishing activity is not an attack on the fishing industry.

It is an effort to protect the future of that industry.

Seasonal closures, protection of spawning periods, minimum size limits, reduction of juvenile catch, protection of nursery grounds, and control of fishing effort are not designed to remove fishermen’s livelihoods.

They are designed to allow fish populations to grow, mature, reproduce, and recover.

If we only ask how much can be caught today, without asking whether fish will still be available next year or ten years from now, then even a large catch is only a form of borrowing from the future.

Overfishing is not simply catching more fish.

It is preventing the ocean from recovering.

# # The Ocean Is Far More Important Than a Source of Seafood

The ocean does not only provide fish and seafood.

Phytoplankton, algae, and photosynthetic microorganisms in the ocean contribute roughly half of the oxygen produced on Earth.

They also form the foundation of most marine food webs.

These organisms absorb carbon dioxide, participate in global carbon cycling, and support marine life from microscopic organisms to large fish and whales.

Therefore, when we talk about damage to marine ecosystems, the issue is not merely that seafood may become more expensive.

If marine ecosystems continue to deteriorate, food supply, coastal economies, climate regulation, carbon cycling, and global ecological stability may all be affected.

Human society cannot continue normally beside an ocean that has lost its basic ecological functions.

Our dependence on the ocean is far greater than many people realise.

Protecting the ocean is not only about protecting fish.

It is about protecting the foundation of human life.

# # To Meet Market Demand, Aquaculture Must Be Encouraged More Strongly

Global population continues to grow, and demand for fish and aquatic products will not disappear.

If every increase in seafood demand continues to depend on wild capture fisheries, pressure on marine resources will continue to rise.

This is why aquaculture is no longer an optional industry.

It is becoming an increasingly important part of future food production.

The global seafood supply structure has already changed.

Aquaculture production of aquatic animals has now surpassed capture fisheries for the first time, becoming a major source of aquatic food worldwide.

This shows that future growth in seafood demand must increasingly be supported by aquaculture, rather than by continuing to take more from wild fish populations.

Of course, encouraging aquaculture does not mean that every farming method should be promoted.

If aquaculture pollutes natural waters, damages coastal habitats, depends heavily on chemicals, or uses unsustainable feed resources, then it simply transfers one environmental pressure into another.

What should be encouraged is responsible aquaculture that is more efficient, controllable, and environmentally sustainable.

This is where modern aquaculture technologies, including Recirculating Aquaculture Systems, can play an important role.

RAS is not intended to completely replace capture fisheries.

It is also not the only solution for aquaculture.

Its value lies in its ability to produce aquatic food under more controlled conditions through water reuse, water quality management, waste collection, and improved biosecurity.

This can reduce direct dependence on natural water bodies and provide a more stable and predictable supply of aquatic products.

The future seafood supply should not be built on continuously exhausting marine resources.

Capture fisheries must remain within the recovery capacity of the ecosystem.

At the same time, growing market demand should increasingly be met through more responsible aquaculture.

# # Today We Are Taking More Than Fish

The ocean will not collapse because of one fishing trip.

But when every fishing season exceeds the recovery capacity of the ecosystem, when large mature fish continue to disappear, when juvenile fish enter the market before reproducing, and when key species are removed from the food web, the ecosystem gradually loses its ability to recover.

The most dangerous situation is not when the ocean suddenly has no fish.

The most dangerous situation is when we become accustomed to seeing fewer and smaller fish, and begin to believe that this is normal.

This is known as shifting baseline syndrome.

Each generation accepts the ocean they knew during childhood as the normal condition.

But they may not realise that the previous generation once saw larger fish, richer populations, and healthier ecosystems.

If society continues to accept declining resources as the new normal, the ocean left to future generations may only be a shadow of what once existed.

The real cost of overfishing is not only reduced catch.

It is not only higher seafood prices.

It may mean losing the reproductive strength of fish populations, destabilising marine food webs, reducing the recovery capacity of ecosystems, and taking away resources that should belong to future generations.

Fishing can continue.

But the ocean must be given time to recover.

Aquaculture must continue to develop.

But it must develop in a more responsible and sustainable direction.

How we obtain aquatic food today will determine what remains in the ocean tomorrow.

**References**

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2025). *Review of the State of World Marine Fishery Resources 2025*. FAO, Rome.

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2024). *The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2024: Blue Transformation in Action*. FAO, Rome.

Pauly, D., Christensen, V., Dalsgaard, J., Froese, R., & Torres, F. Jr. (1998). Fishing down marine food webs. *Science, 279*(5352), 860–863.

Jackson, J. B. C., Kirby, M. X., Berger, W. H., et al. (2001). Historical overfishing and the recent collapse of coastal ecosystems. *Science, 293*(5530), 629–637.

Estes, J. A., Terborgh, J., Brashares, J. S., et al. (2011). Trophic downgrading of planet Earth. *Science, 333*(6040), 301–306.

Hixon, M. A., Johnson, D. W., & Sogard, S. M. (2014). BOFFFFs: On the importance of conserving old-growth age structure in fishery populations. *ICES Journal of Marine Science, 71*(8), 2171–2185.

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. (2024). *How Much Oxygen Comes from the Ocean?* NOAA Ocean Service.

Department of Fisheries Malaysia. (2024). *Berita Perikanan, 28 June 2024*. Department of Fisheries Malaysia.

Malaysian Green Technology and Climate Change Corporation. (2023). *Green Practices Guideline for the Fisheries Sector*. MGTC.

Author: Ryan Tan Hong Joo
RAS Eco-Tech Aquaculture Expert | Dr.Fish Founder

#鱼博士每周文献拆解
#鱼博士 #陈丰裕
#环保养殖 #科技养殖 #循环水养殖系统
#养鱼 #养虾 #鱼菜共生

Address

NO 25, Jalan PUSAT PERNIAGAAN FALIM 5, PUSAT PERNIAGAAN FALIM, IPOH
Ipoh
30020

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Dr.Fish 鱼博士 - RAS Aquaculture Specialist posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The School

Send a message to Dr.Fish 鱼博士 - RAS Aquaculture Specialist:

Shortcuts

Share

Category