04/07/2024
This article, written by Ari Knazan-Co-founder of Invictus, is a response to the introduction of the "SafeWrap System" by Rener Gracie, a Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu (BJJ) expert and founder of Gracie University. The system is claimed to be a proprietary method of lateral restraint that can be used to subdue an aggressive, suicidal, or emotionally disturbed person while minimizing the risk of injury to all parties involved. The authors of this article, who are Law Enforcement officers and certified BJJ black belts, express concerns about the claims made by Gracie University and provide counterpoints to their arguments.
The main points raised by the authors are:
The SafeWrap System is not a new invention, as similar techniques have been used in Jiu-Jitsu for decades and have been depicted in old judo and jujutsu textbooks. In the article, These systems include C4C PJJ, Officer Survival Systems (OSS), Sheepdog, Knife Control Concepts (KCC), Jiu Jitsu Five-0, Gunji Taiho Jutsu and Effective Fitness Combatives (EFC) just to name a few are discussed, and specifically the Gunji Taiho Jutsu Partner Assist Techniques P.A.T. system.
The claim that SafeWrap is proprietary and cannot be used without a license is problematic, as it may prevent officers from using the technique in life-or-death situations.
The concept of patenting a move is questionable, as physical movements are not protectable under copyright law.
The effectiveness of SafeWrap is not proven, as claims are not the same as actual data, and peer-reviewed testing is needed to determine its effectiveness.
The claim that no one has escaped the SafeWrap position is also questionable, as there may be counters and movements that can be used to escape the technique.
The authors conclude that while they appreciate the development of new techniques in Law Enforcement, they believe that Gracie University's approach to proprietary ownership and patenting is misguided and may hinder progress in the field. They suggest that instead, officers should focus on continually improving and refining techniques through testing and pressure testing.
It's worth noting that the article appears to be written from a critical perspective, but also acknowledges the value of civilian trainers and Law Enforcement professionals working together to develop effective techniques. The article also highlights the importance of peer-reviewed testing and data collection in determining the effectiveness of new techniques.
“Just because you can doesn’t mean you should.”