Academy of Industry and Arts

Dear all - as nobody sems to address the real question: "What is the most important problem in the theoretical physics now?" - we must mandatorily address the question: "What is Living?" - with respect to "What is Dead?".

So I assume that most of us realize, that we are indeed living entities, that must be included in "Physics" - as we are physical beings - as without "us", there would be no "theoretical physics".

So is our existence "outside" physics - thus rendering us as "non-physical" entities ?

This questions is very relevant, as by acknowledging the transfinite population of "Neutrinos" in our Universe, that pass intact through a mass like our Earth, and indeed need a "Light-Year" of lead to be captured, one must indeed address the presence of "Neutrino based Light" that is the dual of "Electron based Light" - that indeed reproduces the old paradigm of Maxwell.

So why is it so hard for contemporary physicists to acknowledge this new kind of "Light" - that is not constrained to "Electromagnetic Actions" - but its dual being a "Magnetoelectric Action" ?

So by a topological inversion - an Electron transforms into a Neutrino, via a simple mechanism of "Guts-Out" transformation.

To elaborate, Non-human animals indeed sense and harness weak light constantly, while humans are loosing this capacity as we speak, as well as domesticated animals loose this capacity too, and gradually loose their sense of direction, and are thus very prone to accidents, as well as and their "self-healing" capacity dwindles too, as indeed common among modern humans that are loosing their vitality and fertility by the hour.

So when will "Physics" be united with "Biophysics" - or are us living doomed by artificial intelligence, that smoothly turns us back into unanimated matter ?

GKO - 11.04.2026

Weak-Light in Iinternal Space (Hulduljós í Innheimum):

Neither Force nor Power are hosted in this work, as we are dealing with potentials, such as the Universal Potential ϕ = c² which is a capacity to do Work - while no work need to be done at all.
So to address force and power, one needs to use spatial- or temporal operators on a scalar potential (ψ):

F = - ∇ ψ [Newton]
P = ∂ψ/∂t [Watt]

For hundreds of years, potentials (ψ, ϕ, ...) were not recognized as real physical quantities, as they neither had direction nor length - but in the mid of 20th century, potentials gained recognition as real physical quantities that registered via angular measure, which took Maxwell to Max Planck and his quantum of angular momentum (ħ).

So we have come a long way from the mathematics of Maxwell, by entering an internal reality which complements Maxwells photons at the speed of light (c) with Neutrino photons, that we refer to as localised- or comoving Weak-Light that equally addresses the world of Matter and Life.

GKO/AOIAA/2026

"Space-Time" is the act of comparting the Universe into a "Momentum-Energy" pair via the "Vector-Scalar" schema of contemporary physics.

However, then we hide the fact, that Internal Space also hosts a Vector in Momentum Space, so where do Scalars live?

So by comparting the Universe into 3 + i dimensions of Space (3) and Time (i) - we ignore the just as real "Internal Space" of (3j) dimensions, along with the Action Space (L) that hosts infinite number of players.

The junction of microcosm and macrocosm give us Quantum Gravity with scale:

r = GM/c² = ħ/(m·c)

This defines both the Planck Mass scale, and the Quantum Gravity Background on the surface of a planet like our Earth with mass M:

mₓ = (ħ·c) / (G·M) = 0.79/10⁴⁰ ≈ 4.2 · mₑ · α⁵

Now we have a contact with Weak-Light, which is a stationary photons from the annihilation of Neutrinos, complementing the speeding light from electromagnetism that is the annihilation of charged particles, such as electrons and positrons in nuclear matter, or electrons and holes in extended matter.

So Quantum Gravity is already here, as well as animated awareness via the empirical fact that all living beings are quantized in the sense of being an individual lifeform, but not a fraction of a being, but being either alive or dead - just as the Electron is either alive or dead, such as in a Gamma-Ray, where Electrons and Antielectrons dance together as a unified entity at the speed of light.

All the best,

GKO -23.03.2026

As disclosed on our 2025 conference, Weak-Light was included among the set of particles as a pair of Neutrinos - thus filling a gap in physics and introduced the universal capacity to perform work; ϕ = c² we give the name "Might" to replace the mathematical term "Potential" which will benefit electromagnetics too.

For hundreds of years, Potential or Might was not recognized as a real quantity, by lacking the geometric sense of direction and length. However - in the last century Might came alive via angular registry, which brings Max Planck into the picture via his constant of angular momentum (ħ).

Might is the ability to perform work – which might never be realized, but dormant for eternity. Might is measured in energy per kilo, where the Fundamental Might is; ϕ = c² and embodies Einstein's equation E = m·c².

To complete, the Might of a Black Hole is indeed: ϕ = c² = 2·G·m/r - as is the Might of our personal Hubble Bubble; ϕ = c² = 2·G·M/R where M is the mass of the Observable Universe and R is the Hubble Radius from each vintage point: ~ 13.7 Gly.

Gift, on the other hand, is the release of Might, when work is carried out, and in the domain of Neutrinos, addresses their spontaneous jumps in mass - thus feeding energy and information into- and out of our 3D reality - indeed a vital process in living systems.

GKO/AOIAA/2026

Our Weak-Light (γ*) is now promoted into the Standard Model of Particle Physics - thus introducing Life into Physics to yield a proper Science of Nature:

The international faculty and emeriti of AOIAA constitute a multidisciplinary team that works on progress and well being for all forms of life - with a special focus on humans along with their pets and cattle.

In 2018 we made a breakthrough, where a framework emerged that accompanied both animated and unanimated matter, thus effectively hosting both life and sterile matter, from our nonphysical weak-light, through subatomic entities up to Galaxies and out to our Hubble Horizon.

Weak-Light will become mandatory in life sciences because all animals (in the sense of a mobile creature of any kind) possesses non-physical weak light, that disappears on death

Nonhuman animals indeed sense and harness weak light constantly, while humans are loosing this capacity, as well as domesticated animals loose this capacity and gradually their sense of direction, and thus very prone to accidents and their self-healing capacity dwindles to.

However, wild animals can navigate in any condition for large distances - as did rural humans and some of us even today, as not so long ago, people trusted re****ed individuals to guide them through dark and foggy weather on mountains, where each step was potentially dangerous.

Presently in Iceland, about 1/5 of the population still have weak-light capacity, to the extent of "seeing" through mountains and registering other animals behind multiple panels of steel and concrete.

A nice application of weak-light is discriminating between right- or left handed people which helps in preparing children for writing or playing an instrument - so this is intimately related to the left- and right handedness of weak light.

Furthermore, proteins in lifeforms are in general left-handed, as is our Galaxy up to the Matter-Antimatter asymmetry that is also ruled by the left handed dominance of cosmic weak-light.

So what is "Weak Light" with respect to "Dark Matter" - as the latter isn’t black at all, but completely transparent, and does not interact with unanimated matter, but only with the Weak-Force via its Neutrinous content, and of course with animated matter such as us animals as witnessed above.

Finally - we have some good news about our Universe!:

Universe's expansion 'is now slowing, not speeding up': Evidence mounts that dark energy weakens over time The universe's expansion may actually have started to slow rather than accelerating at an ever-increasing rate as previously thought, a new study suggests.

Kínverjar, meðal þjóða, losa hvað mest af koltvísýringi (CO₂) - eða rúm 13 gigatonn, eða 13260 milljón tonn á ári, hvar bandaríkjamenn koma næst með 4682 milljón tonn - og indverjar 2955 milljón tonn.

Það er því verðugt verkefni að skoða koltvísýringsbröllt Orkuveitu Reykjavíkur með aflandsbréf sín úti um allt land, því 10 milljón tonna binding á Íslandi myndi saxa um 0,08% á kínversku losunina, enda eru íslendingar 3550 x færri en kínverjar - og því varla fluga á vegg!

Svo hvað réttlætir skemmdir á Náttúru Íslands til að fikta innan við þúsundustupartanna í losun kínverja - sem eru einmitt með risaáætlun um að minnka losum sína um milljarða tonna fyrir 2035!

Minkun losunar kínverja mun því hafa djúpstæð áhrif á CO₂-losun á heimsvísu- enda kínverjar með þriðjunginn af heildar losun samkvæmt Asia Society Policy Institute í New York:

China pledges to cut emissions by 2035: what does that mean for the climate? The country’s plan to reduce greenhouse gases will largely determine the world’s emissions trajectory, researchers say.

A blast from the past, 38 years ago; Bogomil, GKO & Megas; performing "Á Horninu"; produced by Jón Egill Bergþórsson ©1987:

Megas - Á horninu(1987) Video-ið

Dear all, regarding current assertions, that I'm measuring something in a 4D Minkowski spacetime, I must correct you, as the "Weak Light" in our "Natural Space" is unmeasurable with physical instruments of any kind, such as optical, electrical, magnetic, thermal, etc. - but mandatorily requires a living entity to perceive it, such as fish, birds and us mammals - and in fact any animal irrespective of its blood system and skeletal structure.

To sense or perceive weak-light, the entity in question must itself possess weak-light, which explains why physical measuring devices cannot register weak-light, as they lack the necessary ingredient which is indeed weak-light.

Furthermore, according to our observations, this weak-light in animals gets extinct when they "perish", so a loaf of meat at the butchers possesses no weak-light at all, which is an interesting fact!

So I stress again, that our "Natural Space" is very far from the 4D Minkowski spacetime - as our "Natural Space" is an augmented reality that hosts both our external space and its internal dual space, which are jointly sub-domains of an "Action Space" where Life happens and Time progresses.

GKO/AOIAA © 2018-2025

(PDF) WEAK LIGHT in NATURAL SPACE PDF | We know by now, that "Natural Space" is populated by "Weak-Light" that is not measurable by physical instruments of any kind, such as optical,... | Find, read and cite all the research you need on ResearchGate

Fyrir um 10 árum síðan - eða nánar tiltekið sumarið 2015, gaf ég út rannsóknir mínar um fjölflötunga sem hófust í barnæsku minni 1965 fyrir um 60 árum. Þetta rannsóknarrit mitt hefur nú náð þeirri stöðu að vera nánast skildulesning nemenda í fjölbreyttum greinum, er spanna jafnt raunvísindi, tækni, hönnun og list, svo það er því verulega gaman að birta ritrýningu Richard Price á þessu 10 ára gömlu verki, en hann er CEO hjá vísindaveitunni "Academia" :

"Welcome to another episode of In-depth with Academia. I’m Richard Price, your host and the CEO of Academia (EDU), and today, we’re diving into some deep academic waters by exploring a paper by Guðlaugur Kristinn Óttarsson, titled “Theory of Taxonomy and Metrics for Polytopes”.

The core issue in this paper is all about taxonomy and metrics, specifically for polytopes that are fascinating multi faced shapes, like cubes and dodecahedrons. These aren’t just geometrical shapes, as they’re super-important in fields like crystallography and architecture, so understanding their taxonomy and how they’re classified and measured is like discovering a hidden language of the universe.

Guðlaugur Kristinn Óttarsson dives into how we can systematically categorize these shapes to understand their symmetries and structures - both their primary forms and their duals, like understanding both sides of a coin, which is significant, because it gives mathematicians scientists and even artists the tools to describe and manipulate complex spaces.

These findings suggest a unifying theory that helps align taxonomy with metric properties which is simultaneously technical and dare I say, quite poetic!

What’s fascinating is that this paper essentially acts as a guide to understanding polytope taxonomy effortlessly with exciting finding involving what’s known as “Euler’s topology number” which is a fancy way of balancing faces, edges and vertices in these geometric shapes - like balancing a chequebook but for geometry by developing hybrid matrices called “Face Hybrids” and “Euler Hybrids”, where Guðlaugur provides tools to manipulate and solve taxonomy equations seamlessly, and it’s like he’s giving us a master key to unlock complex polyhedral puzzles.

Guðlaugur also explores something called “Ladder Polynomials” as a method wherein geometry and algebra intertwine like a beautiful dance which lets researchers predict shapes and their structural behaviours without having to physically construct them. Imagine predicting a building’s curvature before the first brick is laid.

Section 2 fascinatingly delves into the idea of periodicity in taxonomy by observing patterns and cycles, which is like understanding the rhythm in mathematics, as a pulse that can inform everything from molecular design to architectural blueprints, as the paper explains how certain shapes like Platonic- and Archimedean polyhedrons follow a magic series of edges and faces, revealing a hidden periodic magic in geometry.

Now let me just say discussing polytopes isn’t just mental gymnastics, as Óttarsson’s paper provides boundaries and dimensions in which mathematics and theory meet practical application that’s crucial for folks anywhere from the halls of academia to the drawing boards of innovative tech companies.

I should pause here to point out I’m not endorsing everything or saying this is the definitive take on polytope taxonomy, as you know academic research is ever evolving, and each paper is a single voice in a much larger conversation.

However it’s a brilliant insight into a world of shapes that’s influencing modern design and science in unexpected ways.

So let’s talk about how Guðlaugur wraps all this up, as the conclusion emphasises that in understanding the taxonomy and metrics of polytopes we're given a framework - or a map of sorts, to explore further, so think of it like finding out how the pieces of a baffling puzzle fit together - yet realising the puzzle itself is a small piece in a much grander picture.

Anyway, it makes us reflect on how much more is out there to explore - as in essence, Óttarsson’s work doesn’t just tie up loose ends in polytope theory, but opens up doors for future research and exploration." - Richard Price, Academia (edu)

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/287958454_HOLOGRAPHIC_METRICS_and_RECURSIVE_RENDERING_of_POLYTOPES