20/05/2026
On one of my last Educational seminars, I recently saw an educational stall selling colorful cards that turn complex organic chemistry names into cartoon or heroic characters, at fancy prices and on subscription issues.
For quick recall before a quiz, itβs effective. But it does the thinking for the student. The child isnβt figuring out why lithium works in batteries; theyβre remembering Mr. Lee the lion.
So, does it "go okay with the explanation"? As a memory aid, yes. As a tool to build deep thinking, not really. Itβs the difference between giving a fish vs teaching to fish.
My take here is --- These cards are great for recall and making chemistry less intimidating. The risk is when this becomes the whole lesson. If teachers use this to spark curiosity ;"Now why do YOU think lithium is like a bucket?" then it keeps the creative thinking alive. If it replaces that discussion, then it proves the point.
My point is we pair tools like this with activities where students create their own analogies too thatβs where real learning stands. Learning should spark imagination, not just memorization through marketable shortcuts.
Marketing everything as educational toys, starting from foundational years, somewhere crippling the child's innate ability to discover and inventory by their own, the natural thinking or seeing the world around them.