Strī-dharma As It Is

Directions Website Contact the school

Strī-dharma As It Is We value, honor, and promote traditional women’s roles such as wife, mother, or homemaker, but bhakti-yoginis have also duties as disciples (sisya-dharma).

For intance, Srila Prabhupada wrote (8 Feb 1968): “we want so many preachers, both men and women.”

The Claim That Women Are ‘Less Intelligent’Within some Gaudiya institutions the notion that women are “less intelligent”...
21/09/2026

The Claim That Women Are ‘Less Intelligent’
Within some Gaudiya institutions the notion that women are “less intelligent” is prominent and therefore this disqualifies them from being gurus. Not all women are less intelligent. When Prabhupada describes the feminine psychology as “less intelligent,” he’s referring to a propensity for material attachment and emotional absorption, which can make the state of being undisturbed by the body’s demands more difficult to reach.

He used this same metric to critique modern men, noting that most men are “less intelligent” because they don’t inquire into spirituality and prefer to spend their lives absorbed in material subjects.

In the Brihad-devata (2.82) of Shaunaka Rishi, the names of no fewer than twenty-six women who have contributed hymns to the Vedas are listed. This means that they composed, practiced, taught, and initiated others in these hymns, for only the creator of a hymn or those coming in the creator's disciplic succession can initiate others. Many of these hymns can still be found in the Vedas.

This also shows that earlier women studied the Vedas.

From the book: “Rishikas & Vaishnavis - women as gurus” by Pranada Devi Dasi.

Download it for free: https://www.pranadacomtois.com/.../Rishikas-Vaishnavis...

21/09/2026

The more you tolerate disrespect, broken boundaries or behaviour that keeps hurting you, the more people may assume it’s acceptable.

Setting boundaries isn’t being rude or difficult; it’s having self-respect.

Healthy relationships require mutual respect, clear communication and accountability.

Sometimes, protecting your peace means teaching people what you will-and will not-accept.

[boundaries, setting boundaries, self respect, self worth, relationship advice, healthy relationships, toxic relationships, emotional maturity, personal growth, protecting your peace, relationship problems, communication in relationships, knowing your worth, stop tolerating disrespect, people pleasing, self awareness, confidence, mental peace, inner peace, life lessons, positivity, motivation, hare krishna, gauranga das]

The Guru Issue: We Are Vaishnavas“We Are Vaisnavas”By Sankirtana Das (ACBSP)The debate in ISKCON for the last decade or ...
20/09/2026

The Guru Issue: We Are Vaishnavas

“We Are Vaisnavas”

By Sankirtana Das (ACBSP)

The debate in ISKCON for the last decade or two about women gurus is still unresolved. In 2019 a GBC resolution allowed Vaishnavis (devotee women) to initiate disciples of their own with specific conditions – they had to be at least 55 years old and in a stable ashrama situation, as well as fulfilling all the other requirements for Vaishnava men. The resolution was passed by a vote of 19 in favor, 2 opposed, and 8 abstentions.

Most devotees saw this resolution as fulfilling Srila Prabhupada’s vision for his movement, first stated in a lecture of August 17, 1968 – “So all my students present here who are feeling so much obliged… I am also obliged to them because they are helping me in this missionary work. At the same time, I shall request them all to become spiritual master. Everyone of you should be spiritual master next.”

Several months later, in a letter January 3, 1969, he again expressed his desire: “I want that all of my spiritual sons and daughters will inherit this title of Bhaktivedanta so that the family transcendental diploma will continue through the generations. Those possessing the title of Bhaktivedanta will be allowed to initiate disciples. Maybe by 1975, all of my disciples will be allowed to initiate and increase the numbers of the generations. That is my program.”

Over the years Prabhupada made similar statements reaffirming his desire and vision for his International Society for Krishna Consciousness (ISKCON). But for some reason the GBC withdrew their 2019 decision. Now the topic has been relegated into a limbo state of perpetual discussion with no resolution in sight.

The topic becomes muddled because when it came to discussions about the varnashrama social system, Prabhupada certainly made distinctions between men and women. Sometimes he spoke about the constitutional position of men and women and their duties in society. He also noted that women are more inclined to express religious or spiritual sentiments, but, in general, they were not so philosophically inclined. On the other hand, when speaking of transcendental consciousness, he made no distinction. Prabhupada offers a different perspective, “The Vaiṣṇava never accepts another Vaiṣṇava on the basis of birthright, just as he never thinks of the Deity of the Lord in a temple as an idol.” (SB 2.4.18, purport)

Prabhupada has written and spoken millions of words, available in many forms: books, lectures, conversations and letters. He gave countless, and sometimes seemingly contradictory, instructions. The instructions are not contradictory but are based on the sacred Vaisnava teachings and Prabhupada’s far-reaching vision. As he has often explained, we have to consider time, place and circumstances in presenting Krishna Consciousness.

In a June 14, 1969 letter Prabhupada tells us, “Caitanya Mahaprabhu has said that anyone who knows the science of Krishna, that person should be accepted as spiritual master, regardless of any material so-called qualifications; such as rich or poor, man or woman, or brahmana or sudra.”

Prabhupada wanted foremost to establish a brahminical order to help people distinguish between dharma and adharma, help guide the world toward peace and prosperity, and reawaken one’s loving relationship with Sri Krishna. In this way he gave the teachings to both men and women, and envisioned that one day all his disciples in good standing would serve as gurus.

But let us examine the trajectory of the modern day acaryas which began with Bhaktivinoda Thakur in the latter part of the 19th century. He sent some of his books overseas to Western colleges. He envisioned westerners from many countries taking up the Vaisnava tradition, and even coming on pilgrimage to India to chant and dance together.

In the next generation, Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati initiated women and he sent two of his sannyasi disciples to England to present the Vaisnava teachings in the West. After a two year effort, supported by Bhaktisiddhanta’s mission, they returned to India with only one European gentleman who accepted initiation.

In 1965 Srila Prabhupada made an unprecedented journey to the West. With no funds he simply hitched a ride on a cargo ship. In New York he lived among the hippies who championed free love making and free drugs. But he inspired them to observe the four regulations of spiritual life. He also gave both men and women brahminical initiation, and also had women serving on the altar. He had some of the initiated ladies cooking for him. This was all unheard of in India, even amongst the Vaisnava community. Prabhupada also envisioned all of his disciples (men & women) serving as spiritual masters to expand the movement into the future. This is the trajectory established step by step by the modern acharyas.

In his instructions to grow his movement, Prabhupada never said that he didn’t want the women to be gurus. Rather, he advocated again and again, as part of the trajectory, that all his disciples eventually take up the service of being gurus: “So I hope that all of you, men, women, boys and girls, become spiritual master, and follow this principle. Spiritual master, simply, sincerely, follow the principles and speak to the general public. Then Kṛṣṇa immediately becomes your favorite. Kṛṣṇa does not become your favorite; you become Kṛṣṇa’s favorite.” (Vyasa-puja Address, London August 22nd, 1973)

Being involved in theater for many years, the idea is that, in developing your part for the stage, you practice constantly. You study the words your character speaks. You learn to move and speak in a certain way to establish your part. Then you go on stage to present the drama. But what is the value of an actor practicing for weeks or months if they never go on stage. The whole purpose is to perform your part for the audience. The mission of a director is to prepare the actor. In the same way, Prabhupada saw his mission as preparing his disciples to become leaders to educate and guide the world in Krishna Consciousness.

In a July 18, 1971 conversation in Detroit, Prabhupada expressed this vision for the future when a visitor inquired: “After you, is it any decision has been made who will take over?”
Prabhupada: “Yes. All of them will take over. These students, who are initiated from me, all of them will act as I am doing. Just like I have got many Godbrothers, they are all acting. Similarly, all these disciples which I am making, initiating, they are being trained to become future spiritual masters.”

Prabhupada also foresaw the possibility of his mission manifesting itself a little differently in the East and the West: “It is not necessary that the rules and regulations followed in India be exactly the same as those in Europe, America and other Western countries” (CC Madhya 23.105 purport). Nevertheless, Prabhupada always declared his movement as “transcendental” – meaning beyond all mundane considerations. As ISKCON spread throughout the world, he always expressed a clear, overarching vision for his movement.

In a lecture in Mayapur, India on April 6, 1975, Prabhupada quoted the order of Lord Caitanya (CC Madhya 7.128) and followed with, “Suppose you have got now ten thousand. We shall expand to hundred thousand. That is required. Then hundred thousand to million, and million to ten million. . . . . . So there will be no scarcity of acarya, and people will understand Krsna consciousness very easily.”

It’s not difficult to understand Prabhupada’s overarching vision for his movement. One must ask, why would a disciple not want to support Prabhupada’s desire and vision? Especially, when he repeatedly makes the point – “Women in our movement can also preach very nicely. Actually male and female bodies, these are just outward designations. Lord Caitanya said that whether one is brahmana or whatever he may be, if he knows the science of Krsna then he is to be accepted as guru” (Letter, December, 25 1974).

It’s not difficult to understand this statement – “We are Vaisnavas. We are not concerned with male or female position in life. That is simply body concept of life. It is not spiritual.” (Letter, February 15, 1975)

Or this statement – “To spread Kṛṣṇa consciousness, one need only be cognizant of the science of the spirit soul. It does not matter whether one is a brāhmaṇa, kṣatriya, vaiśya, śūdra, sannyāsī, gṛhastha or whatever. If one simply understands this science, he can become a spiritual master.” (CC Madhya 8.128 purport)

In a room conversation of August 2, 1976, Prabhupada quoted CC Madhya 7.128 and made this heartfelt appeal: “This is Caitanya Mahāprabhu. Every one of you become guru and deliver the residents of your neighborhood Ei deśa. Wherever you are living, just deliver them. Become their guru. How to become guru? It is not difficult. Yāre dekha tāre kaha ‘kṛṣṇa’-upadeśa. What Kṛṣṇa has said instruct them. You simply repeat it, that’s all. You become guru. So this should be preached all over the world.”

Prabhupada himself, you might say, began as a neighborhood guru in his little storefront in the lower eastside, hippy neighborhood of New York. His movement grew and quickly spread all over the world in eleven short years. Why? Because he was inspiring, inclusive and empowering. When those early devotees saw Prabhupada’s welcoming spirit, they knew they wanted to be part of his mission.

Prabhupada’s words were often revolutionary. Some devotees might falsely assume Prabhupada didn’t really mean some of the things he was saying and, they mistakenly think that the present topic at hand is some sort of “feminist” issue. But by studying his teachings, we can see this is a much broader and deeper issue.

In May of 1976, toward the end of his lecture (SB 6.1.21) at the Honolulu temple He told the devotees present that Lord Caitanya wants “that ‘every one of you become guru.’ He wants not rascal imitation guru but real guru. That He wants. Because people are in darkness, we require many millions of gurus to enlighten them.” Lecture – May 21, 1976

Prabhupada urged his disciples to present the eternal truths of Vedic wisdom according to time, place and circumstances. In a 1971 letter to Dr. Bigelow, Srila Prabhupada wrote, “It will be a great contribution to human society if this authorized information from the Vedic literature is presented to the modern world on the basis of modern scientific understanding. The fact is already there. It simply has to be presented for modern understanding.”

And indeed, he expressed this mood in a poem to his guru Bhaktisiddanta Sarasvati in 1936:

The line of service
As drawn by you
Is pleasing and healthy
Like morning dew.
The oldest of all
But in new dress
Miracle done
Your Divine Grace.

Prabhupada encouraged us to thoroughly study his books – “I am very much stressing nowadays that my students shall increase their reading of my books and try to understand them from different angles of vision. Each sloka can be seen from many, many angles of vision, so become practiced in seeing things like this.” (Letter, June 16, 1972) It is not necessary for all devotees to agree on everything. Within ISKCON, devotees can implement their different “angles of vision” and the movement can easily move forward in the various places devotees find themselves in. This is an opportunity for ISKCON to exhibit to the world Prabhupada’s principle of Unity in Diversity.

Prabhupada’s early disciples, now in their 60s, 70’s, and 80s, and still participating in the movement are an invaluable asset to ISKCON. In any other community or culture, they would be considered elders who freely share their matured wisdom and experiences with anyone who inquires from them. These devotees have been meditating on the holy name of Krishna for a half century or more. In the early days of the movement, these devotees were ready to make any sacrifice to fulfill Prabhupada’s smallest desire. Many abandoned ambitions, careers and college educations. And now, over 50 years later, it is certainly time for the movement to invest in these elders, men and women alike. As per Prabhupada’s vision, whoever wants to accept the task and responsibility of becoming a spiritual master should be allowed to do so.

Prabhupada’s words, “We are Vaisnavas” must resound throughout the Hare Krishna Movement. It was a revolutionary concept over 500 years ago when Lord Caitanya angered the Hindus as He chanted the holy names of Krishna in the public arena and welcomed Haridas Thakur, a Moslem, into His inner circle. It was revolutionary when, in the early part of the 20th century, Bhaktisiddhanta declared that Vaisnavas are transcendental to all social designations. He explained that a Vaisnava is willing to go to any lengths to give others the opportunity to worship Vishnu, even willing to go to heaven or to hell in the service of the Supreme Lord. And it was revolutionary when Prabhupada first brought his western disciples to India in 1971, again challenging traditional Hindu beliefs and perspectives. And Prabhupada’s statement is still revolutionary today. This understanding of what a Vaisnava is will surcharge all the devotees and bring the presentation of Krishna Consciousness up to a new level of involvement.

In these confused and chaotic times, Vaisnavas are agents of Krishna’s compassion. They need to demonstrate how to be peaceful; how to be kind and equal to everyone; how to be expert in presenting these ancient teachings, and work for the benefit of the entire society. In this way, devotees need to move forward just as Prabhupada did in the early days in his little store front on the lower eastside. There he created community, patiently engaging whoever walked through the door in devotional service, amidst respect and love and trust.

Sankirtana Das, a disciple of Srila Prabhupada, is a longtime resident of the New Vrindaban Community and an award-winning author and sacred storyteller. He is also a recipient of a WV Artist Fellowship Award & Grant. His most recent book, Hanuman’s Quest, is acclaimed by scholars and has received a Storytelling World Resource Honor. He also is on the Board of the Vedic Friends Association. Also see Mahabharata-Project.com for his new PDF file Making the Dharma Relevant.

https://mahabharata-project.com/

20/09/2026
20/09/2026

First session today at 4pm PDT/7pm EDT

Women Initiating Was an Accepted Social Norm in VrajaAnd in Mukta-carita, Raghunatha dasa Goswami writes of Lord Krishna...
19/09/2026

Women Initiating Was an Accepted Social Norm in Vraja

And in Mukta-carita, Raghunatha dasa Goswami writes of Lord Krishna’s conversation with Satyabhama in Dvaraka, when Lord Krishna tells her about His earlier pearl pastime with the gopis in Vraja. During that pastime the gopis seek initiation from Nandimukhi, who is “a disciple into the siddha-mantra at the lotus feet of Paurnamasi. Hoping to receive the same siddha-mantra, the gopis approach Nandimukhi with their request. In this way, Raghunatha dasa Goswami indicates that women initiating was an accepted social norm in Vraja.

Let’s meditate on Krishna’s statement found in Chaitanya-charitamrita Adi 4.124:

rādhikāra prema—guru, āmi—śiṣya naṭa
sadā āmā nānā nṛtye nācāya udbhaṭa

“My guru is Radharani,” Krishna says. “In loving affairs My guru is Radharani, so She always makes Me dance according to Her tune.”

From the book: “Rishikas & Vaishnavis - women as gurus” by Pranada Devi Dasi.

Download it for free: https://www.pranadacomtois.com/.../Rishikas-Vaishnavis...

19/09/2026

You see, if you can make Radharani be pleased with you and She gives a word to Krsna, then Krsna will always take the advice of Radharani. So Srila Prabhupada said, we should try to please Radharani. And then if She says that Krsna, this is a nice devotee, then all is good!
HH Jayapataka Swami
May 18, 2021

Happy Radhastami! May Srimati Radharani's mercy flow to each of us.
19/09/2026

Happy Radhastami!

May Srimati Radharani's mercy flow to each of us.

Do the Vedas Say a Chaste Wife Can Disobey Her Husband?By Paramadayala Nityananada DasaIn ISKCON we answer this question...
18/09/2026

Do the Vedas Say a Chaste Wife Can Disobey Her Husband?

By Paramadayala Nityananada Dasa

In ISKCON we answer this question by citing Srila Prabhupada's translations, purports, and spoken statements. That's the only way we can claim to be presenting "Stri Dharma As It Is"

There is a reason we say purports, not commentaries. The AI generated description of the difference fits our understanding:

Purport:

The main purpose, main point, or implied meaning of something.

Commentary:

A series of explanatory notes, interpretations, or criticisms on a text.

Before formerly accepting Srila Prabhupada, we must thoroughly analyze his activities and teachings, in order to develop firm faith. To develop firm faith, we first accept him tentatively and serve him. Factual acceptance denotes firm conviction which is nether fanatical or dogmatic. Formal acceptance should come only after factual acceptance.

If one doesn’t have firm conviction that Srila Prabhupada words are as good as Vedic texts, and can't justify it to an intelligent audience, they have no right to claim to be representing him. Of course, one can qualify themselves by stating their level of commitment and recommend others read Srila Prabhupada's books. But the definition of a cheater is one who presents themselves as an authority on a subject they don’t understand. If we don’t understand that Srila Prabhupada's teaching is absolute truth, we cannot represent him authoritatively.

Regarding our specific question: Chapter 23 of Krishna book describes wives of a group of brahmans who performed sacrifices. The wives rejected the orders of their husband's because the husbands were trying to impede their spiritual advancement. Although the husbands tried to stop them, they took food prepared for a sacrifice, left their husbands, and delivered it to Krishna. They were thinking their husbands would never take them back. Thus, they renounced their husbands, children, homes, and means of material survival, to serve Krishna. This disobedience to the husband is worthy of praise by all

When the wives returned, the husbands condemned themselves and praised the wives. Between Srila Prabhupada's quotation of the husband's he adds:

"...Women in general, being very simple at heart, can very easily take to Kṛṣṇa consciousness, and when they develop love of Kṛṣṇa they can easily get liberation from the clutches of māyā, which are very difficult for even so-called intelligent and learned men to surpass..."(End Quote).

This isn’t a sentimental statement. It is a description of what happened. And Srila Prabhupada explains the general truth which the anecdote establishes. That's this chapter " As It Is"

Let’s scrutinize the texts and purport regarding a female who shouldn’t have disobeyed her husband. Lord Siva told his wife, Srimati Sati Devi:

SB 4.3 24 Text

Therefore you should not see your father, although he is the giver of your body, because he and his followers are envious of me. Because of his envy, O most worshipful one, he has insulted me with cruel words although I am innocent.

Text 25

If in spite of this instruction you decide to go, neglecting my words, the future will not be good for you. You are most respectable, and when you are insulted by your relative, this insult will immediately be equal to death. (End Text).

It is noteworthy that Lord Siva is speaking in a kind and reasonable manner. Mother Sati paced back and forth thinking about his words, then she left.

SB 4.4.3 Text

Thereafter Satī left her husband, Lord Śiva, who had given her half his body due to affection. Breathing very heavily because of anger and bereavement, she went to the house of her father. This less intelligent act was due to her being a weak woman.

Purport

According to the Vedic conception of family life, the husband gives half his body to his wife, and the wife gives half of her body to her husband. In other words, a husband without a wife or a wife without a husband is incomplete. Vedic marital relationship existed between Lord Śiva and Satī, but sometimes, due to weakness, a woman becomes very much attracted by the members of her father’s house, and this happened to Satī. In this verse it is specifically mentioned that she wanted to leave such a great husband as Śiva because of her womanly weakness. In other words, womanly weakness exists even in the relationship between husband and wife. Generally, separation between husband and wife is due to womanly behavior; divorce takes place due to womanly weakness. The best course for a woman is to abide by the orders of her husband. That makes family life very peaceful. Sometimes there may be misunderstandings between husband and wife, as found even in such an elevated family relationship as that of Satī and Lord Śiva, but a wife should not leave her husband’s protection because of such a misunderstanding. If she does so, it is understood to be due to her womanly weakness. (End Quote).

Again, Srila Prabhupada describes what happened and general facts which the anecdote demonstrates. Srila Prabhupada says that womanly weakness exists even in the relationship of husband and wife. We can conclude that a chaste wife should not disobey a husband who has control of his senses- when he tells her to control her senses, to avoid harm. But she must have personal strength to follow this instruction.

We may not be able to see how everything stated in the purport is derived from the text. That's why Krishna sent us Srila Prabhupada. Our job is to present both the text and the purport as it is. There are ways which this purport can be distorted.

To properly represent this Vedic instruction, we must understand, and accurately describe, how the Vedas define weakness. A loving Guru doesn't reject a disciple because of weakness. If one admits their faults and does the best they can, they will eventually succeed. The entire sixth chapter of " Perfection of Yoga" describes this fact.

If a bias devotee exaggerates a weak action of a woman, and claims it means she is incorrigible, while at the same time justifying improper actions of men, they aren’t presenting this point "As It Is". These things are going on.

If an individual tries to wiggle around the truth, and deny womanly weakness is a real thing, because it doesn't jibe with their sensibilities, they aren’t presenting the point " As It Is". These things are also going on.

So, ideally, a woman has the intelligence to discern which instructions of her husband she should accept and which ones she should reject. She must also have personal strength to reject bad advice and follow good advice. If she fails in this regard, because of weakness, she isn’t permanently doomed. She should pray to Krishna for strength and intelligence, while continuing in devotional service (POY Chapter 6).

However, some individuals presume to be representing Srila Prabhupada while presenting spurious arguments for how his description of " womanly weakness" can be completely disregarded. They are not accepting, or presenting "Stri Dharma As It Is."


Address

Gaura Village
Mayapur
741313

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Strī-dharma As It Is posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The School

Send a message to Strī-dharma As It Is:

Shortcuts

Share