Assignment Finisher

With BPP – I just got recognized as one of their top fans! 🎉

TASK 1
a) Using a model of reflective practice, reflect on a task that you completed at work or university to
identify your own skill set. Identify both your strengths and weaknesses.
b) Analyse the skills you identified with reference to your choice of career or job.
N.B. To support your answer, you should refer to the reflective model by Gibbs or Schön and
additional reading resources from this module. You should also include ideas from articles on wider
leadership concepts and personal effectiveness from the online library.
(This task meets LO2)
(Total marks for Task 1: 35% weighting)
TASK 2
a) Using the Covey self-assessment questionnaire, identify your own strengths and
weaknesses. Explain these with examples from your own life. (Include a screenshot of the
results from the questionnaire in the appendix).
b) Discuss how your weaknesses can impact your chosen career.
N.B. You should support your analysis with references to additional reading resources from this
module. You should also include ideas from articles in the online library.
(This task meets LO1)
(Total marks for Task 2: 35% weighting)
TASK 3
Choose a maximum of two areas for improvement (weaknesses) from Tasks 1 and 2.
Develop a concise short-term plan using the SMART model or the Agile model to improve
these areas. Explain how these plans will enhance your personal brand.
N.B. You should support your answer with references to additional reading resources from this
module. You should also include ideas from articles in the online library.
(This task meets LO3)
(Total marks for Task 3: 20% weighting)
Conclusion
You will need to summarise the key points of the assessment tasks.
You should end with a concluding statement on the main topic of the report.
Structure
Your Personal Effectiveness report should contain the following:
• BPP assignment cover sheet (including SRN and word count)
• Personal Effectiveness report title page
• Contents page
• Introduction (200 words)
• Task 1 (800 words)
• Task 2 (800 words)
• Task 3 (500 words)
• Conclusion (200 words)
• References (Correct Harvard Referencing applied throughout, including in-text citation and
reference list)
• Appendices (if required)
• Glossary (optional)
FULL GURANTEE OF PASSING ASSIGNMENTS: PLEASE CONTACT US: 096603 02624 OR GMAIL US: [email protected]

We help the students in writing assignments, research papers, thesis, dissertations, essays, etc. with different referencing styles like APA, MLA, AGLC and Harvard to secure good grades at reasonable prices. contact us: +919660302624 or gmail us: [email protected]

we are your best assignment partner😊😊

Assessment Details and Submission Guidelines
Unit Code
Unit Title
Assessment Type:
Due Date + time: Week 11
Weight 40 %
Total Marks 40 marks
Words Maximum 2500 words
Submission Guidelines • All work must be submitted on Blackboard by the due date along with a

completed Assignment Cover Page.
• The assignment must be in MS Word format unless otherwise specified.

Academic Integrity
Information

Holmes Institute is committed to ensuring and upholding academic integrity. All
assessments must comply with academic integrity guidelines. Please learn about
academic integrity and consult your teachers with any questions. Violating academic
integrity is serious and punishable by penalties that range from deduction of marks,
failure of the assessment task or unit involved, suspension of course enrolment, or
cancellation of course enrolment.

Penalties • All work must be submitted on Blackboard by the due date and time, along with

a completed Assessment Cover Page. Late penalties apply.
• Your answers must be based on Holmes Institute syllabus of this unit. Outside
sources may not amount to more than 10% of any answer and must be correctly
referenced in full. Over-reliance on outside sources will be penalised
• Reference sources must be cited in the text of the report and listed appropriately
at the end in a reference list using Holmes Institute Adapted Harvard
Referencing. Penalties are associated with incorrect citation and referencing.

HI6027 Group Assignment T2 2024

Group Assignment Guidelines and Specifications

Q. 1 Contract Law Question (20 marks)
Ben wants to impress his girlfriend by buying her a gold TAG Heuer watch. He visits a watch shop and
is shocked to see that the prices range from $25,000 to $400,000, which he cannot afford.
Hearing this, the shopkeeper offers Ben a special TAG Heuer watch from the back of the store, claiming
it’s a unique "TAG Heuer X" model, indicated by the extra letter "X" on the watch. The watch has small
diamonds and a gold frame. The shopkeeper tells Ben that because it’s so special, he will sell it to him
for only $1,000.
Excited by the offer, Ben quickly agrees and buys the watch. Later that evening, Ben gives the watch
to his girlfriend at a restaurant. She is initially happy but then notices that the watch is not working
and realises that the brand name "TAG Heuer X" on the watch is actually fake. The diamonds fall out
when she slams the watch on the table, and she leaves the restaurant, furious at Ben.
Ben now wants to know if he has any legal action against the shopkeeper who sold him the watch.
What are Ben's rights, and what action can he take?
In your answer, analyse the elements of a contract and apply them to the facts. Focus only on Contract
Law and do not consider Australian Consumer Law. (Maximum – 1000 words)

Q 2 Negligence Law question (10 marks)

On 3 April 2023, Charles Burnett placed an advertisement in the Trading Post, a specialist newspaper,
advertising a garage sale to be held at her home in the weekend of 5-6 April 2023. Charles has previous
experience in conducting garage sales. Such activities are common in the suburbs of Sydney, where
Charles’s home was situated, and elsewhere throughout Australia.

The first day of the garage sale, 5 April 2023, started out clear and sunny. Charles's property included
a concrete driveway extending from a carport annexed to the house to the public footpath and road.
The driveway comprised sections of concrete joined in an expansion joint which extended throughout
its length. Charles placed a variety of domestic articles for sale on a timber table situated on the
southern side of the driveway close to the carport. Prospective purchasers had no alternative but to

HI6027 Group Assignment T2 2024
approach the goods by walking over the driveway. Charles expected a volume of pedestrian traffic to
attend the sale. He knew, or ought reasonably to have known, of the disparity in the levels of the
adjoining concrete slabs in the forecourt of his home.

Darlene entered Charles's premises at about 8:40 a.m. wearing slip-on shoes. She walked towards the
timber table. To do this, she had to cross the divide in the concrete slabs. An object caught her eye,
presumably one of the garden or other items for sale on the timber table. At that point, her right foot
rolled on the elevation of one concrete slab as it adjoined the adjacent slab. Darlene, a woman then
aged 53, fell towards the ground, touching it but then regaining her footing. In the course of this
motion, she felt a crack in her right foot. This was later diagnosed as having caused a fracture.

Darlene sued Charles in the Local Court of New South Wales claiming damages for negligence. Using
legal principles and rules learned on Negligence, advise Darlene on whether her case against Charles
will be successful. (Maximum – 750 words)

Q 3 Corporations Law question (10 marks)

AI Solutions Pty Ltd (“AI”) owns 50% of the shares of GPT Electronics (“GPT Electronics”) Pty Ltd. Last
year, AI was contacted by Betacoms Pty Ltd (“Betacoms”), which owns the other 50% of AI. Betacoms
wanted to invest a large sum of money in GPT Electronics, to allow it to research and develop a
potentially valuable software application. The directors of AI at the time hired a team of consultants,
which included a software applications expert, and instructed them to research the technical aspects
of the proposed application and future possibilities involving the technology.

The team of consultants worked for three months researching for and writing the report. The report
they presented to AI’s directors showed that the proposed investment in the software application
could very likely prove successful. Jerry Springer is one of AI’s directors. He holds a Master of Computer
Programming degree from a well-known university. Jerry’s fellow directors asked him about the
consultants’ positive projections. Jerry told them that the report is accurate. In reality though, some
of the information in the report was not well-researched and supported by up-to-date data. As a result,
when AI’s directors rely on the report and invest the company’s money in the new software application,
the investment will not be as lucrative as the consultants predicted.

Citing specific Common Law and Corporations Act directors’ duties, critically analyse and discuss
whether the directors of AI Solutions Pty Ltd (or any of them) breached their duty of care? (Maximum

HI6027 Group Assignment T2 2024

– 750 words)

to make this assignment with quality, please contact us: +91 9660302624 or gmail us: [email protected]

CW1 – - 50% (2000 words)

Assignment Overview

This assignment involves writing an individual literature review, which accounts for 50% of your final grade. The literature review should be 2000 words in length and should demonstrate your ability to critically evaluate and synthesize existing research within your chosen topic area, specifically focusing on contemporary issues in consumer behavior.

Objectives

The objective of this literature review is to develop your skills in:

1. Researching and identifying relevant literature: You should be able to find and select scholarly sources that are pertinent to your chosen topic.
2. Critically evaluating sources: Analyze the quality, relevance, and contributions of each source.
3. Synthesizing information: Combine insights from multiple sources to provide a comprehensive understanding of the topic.
4. Writing and structuring a literature review: Present your findings in a clear, organized, and academically rigorous manner.

Requirements

1. Topic Selection:

a. Choose a topic relevant to contemporary issues in consumer behavior. Ensure that the topic is neither too broad nor too narrow, allowing for a thorough exploration of the literature.
b. Get your topic from the list below. If you wish to choose a topic not indicated below please get the approval from your instructor.

2. Suggested Topics: Choose only ONE from the list below

1. Impact of Digital Marketing on Consumer Behavior
2. Consumer Privacy Concerns in the Age of Big Data
3. Sustainability and Ethical Consumerism
4. Influence of Social Media Influencers on Purchasing Decisions
5. Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Consumer Decision-Making

3. Literature Requirements:

a. Include a minimum of 10 scholarly sources (e.g., peer-reviewed journal articles, books, conference papers).
b. Ensure the sources are recent (preferably published within the last 5 years) and relevant to your topic.
c. Use a variety of sources to provide a well-rounded perspective on the topic.

4. Structure:

a. Introduction: (300 words)

o Introduce your topic and its significance.
o Provide a brief overview of the scope of your literature review.
o State your research question or objective.

b. Main Body: (1300 words)
o Organize the literature thematically, methodologically, or chronologically.
o Critically evaluate and compare the sources.
o Identify gaps, inconsistencies, and debates within the literature.

c. Conclusion: (400 words)
o Summarize the key findings from the literature.
o Discuss the implications of these findings.
o Suggest areas for future research.

d. References:
o Include a reference list formatted according to your Coventry University’s APA citation requirements.

5. Writing and Presentation:

a. Write in clear, academic English.
b. Ensure your review is well-organized and logically structured.
c. Use headings and subheadings to guide the reader.
d. Proofread your work to eliminate grammatical and typographical errors.

6. Assessment Criteria
Your literature review will be assessed based on the following criteria:

a. Relevance and Quality of Sources (20%): The appropriateness, credibility, and diversity of the sources used.
b. Critical Evaluation (30%): Your ability to critically assess the literature, identify key themes, and synthesize information.
c. Organization and Structure (20%): The clarity and coherence of your writing, including the logical flow of ideas and use of headings/subheadings.
d. Writing Quality (20%): The academic rigor of your writing, including grammar, punctuation, and adherence to citation style.
e. Originality and Insight (10%): The depth of your analysis and the originality of your conclusions and suggestions for future research.

7. Submission Guidelines

a. Word Count: 2000 words (+/- 10%)
b. Format: Typed, double-spaced, with 1-inch margins, using a standard 12-point font (e.g., Times New Roman).
c. Submission Method: Submit your literature review via the online submission via Blackboard by 8th October 2024 before 1159PM.

contact us: +91 9660302624 or Gmail us: [email protected]

Reliable and Affordable Academic Writing Service
Service that help students in their academic research and writing. We work with the most qualified research academic writers and editors to complete your essays, term papers, research papers, dissertations, thesis and more.
Order now ✉: [email protected]
WhatsApp ☎: +91 9660302624

4: (Project)
Assessment name (Project)
Brief task
description

You are to respond to the assessment task by writing an essay addressing concepts in
evidence-based practice and clinical inquiry.

Rationale for
assessment task

Individuals have a right to effective, efficient, and safe care. Contemporary healthcare
practice requires the use of evidence to improve health outcomes for individuals,
families, and populations. It is important for healthcare students to understand the
relationship between the generation of research evidence and the delivery of safe and
effective care based on evidence. Knowledge and skills in evidence-based practice (EBP)
is therefore critical to practicing healthcare professionals.
Due Date 24 th September 2024, by 11:59PM AEST (23:59hrs)

Assessment Items submitted after the published due date without an approved extension
or submitted after the revised due date where an extension has been granted, will incur a
penalty of 5% of the Mark awarded to the Student, per Calendar Day late
(https://policy.usq.edu.au/documents/14749PL).

Length 1500 words +/-10%

 Introduction and conclusion section required.
 Word count includes in-text referencing and excludes your reference list and
table of included studies.
 No appendices or title pages required.

Marks out of:
Weighting: Marks out of: 40
Weighting: 40%

Course
Objectives
measured

2. Explain the research process and the links between research, clinical expertise,
patient preferences and evidence-based practice.
3. Define, compare and choose common and appropriate research methodologies,
designs and methods to generate evidence and answer specific research questions.
4. Assess and justify the strengths and weaknesses of a published paper, and its
relevance to clinical practice.
5. Apply key principles and elements in the evidence-based practice process to make
and communicate safe, effective, and efficient clinical decisions for selected client
or context problems.

Task information

2

© University of Southern
Queensland

Task detail The National Health and Medical Research Council defines Level I and Level II evidence as:
 Level I: Systematic reviews or meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials
 Level II: Randomised controlled trials
As part of the APPLY stage of the EBP, use only Level I and or Level II evidence to clearly
answer the following research question: “which wound care interventions (dressings) are
effective in improving wound healing among clients with diabetic foot ulcers?”
Immediately after your introductory paragraph, you must use the relevant evidence to briefly
explain the impact of diabetic foot ulcers on clinical outcomes as a background to your
response.
In APPLYING the literature, you are to search for and review only Level I and/or Level II
evidence relating to the research question “which wound care interventions (dressings) are
effective in improving wound healing among clients with diabetic foot ulcers?”
You are required to include a table of the included studies that you have read and considered
to be only Level I and/or Level II evidence that provides evidence that answers the research
question “which wound care interventions (dressings) are effective in improving wound
healing among clients with diabetic foot ulcers?”) with the following information briefly
summarised from each study:
 Author
 Year
 Study design (you should explicitly state the methodology or method used in the
study)
 Population
 Intervention type(s)
 Comparator intervention (if applicable)
 Outcome(s)
You are then required to synthesize only the Level I and/or Level II evidence that you have
provided within the table of included studies and use the findings from your synthesis of
this evidence to make clear clinical recommendations about “which wound care interventions
(dressings) are effective in improving wound healing among clients with diabetic foot
ulcers?”
You must structure your response under the following headings in the order identified below.
 Introduction
 Background
 Table of Included Studies (not included in word count)
 Synthesis of the Evidence
 Recommendations for practice
 Conclusion
 References
Artificial intelligence is not to be used in this assessment item beyond basic editing features

3

© University of Southern
Queensland

(spelling and grammar) in Microsoft Word, Apple Pages. No automation of written text
allowed. Failure to adhere to this requirement will result in a referral to the Academic
Integrity Unit (AIU) for investigation.

Writing
Style

 This assessment piece must be written in the form of a structured essay using
headings with an introduction and conclusion section.
 Your response must be written in sentence and paragraph form. Bullet points or
lists are NOT to be included in your response.
 A table of included studies must be included.
 Every statement of fact must be supported by a valid reference.
 Referencing style: APA 7th referencing style.
 Sources: You are expected to justify every statement of fact with a valid, peer-
reviewed reference.
 In text citations: You must include in-text citations in the body of your work.
Each new point or piece of evidence must be attributed (via in-text citation) to the
source.
Referencing Support
 UniSQ Library (https://www.usq.edu.au/library/referencing)

Formatting
Style

 Times New Roman, Size 12, 1.5 spaced. Headings are to be included.
 No graphics, coloured text, or title pages.
 A table of included studies must be provided.
 Do not submit the marking rubric with your assignment

Resources
available to
complete
task

USQ academic writing is provided in links on the course Resources Tab.
https://www.usq.edu.au/library/study-support/assignments
Referencing
https://www.usq.edu.au/library/referencing
Artificial Intelligence Guide
https://usq-qld.libguides.com/artificial-intelligence-students

Plagiarism – How to avoid plagiarism
https://www.unisq.edu.au/library/referencing/plagiarism
full guarantee of passing assignments
please contact us: 096603 02624 or email us: [email protected]

Total Words: 2000 (+/-10%)
Groupwork: 3-5 students
This assessment has two parts
Part A: Teamwork
This assessment requires you to review the companies below and focus on the financial
information provided. Your task is to read, interpret and analyse the company website, annual
reports and financial statements for the chosen company and assess the financial performance
and position of a company. You need to demonstrate an understanding of the concepts that are
fundamental to the preparation of accounting information within a business report and
highlight the financial position of the company. Besides, the assignment requires recognition
of Corporate Social Responsibility or Sustainability practices in company’s disclosure which
is of prime importance for the businesses these days and measures the impact the company is
making on environment and the society. You are required to submit a self and peer
assessment of teamwork performance, indicating all members’ contributions to the
assessment. Peer assessment is considered when calculating individual marks. This (team,
with 3-5 members) assignment employs financial information to evaluate a firm’s
performance and financial position. There are four major questions (see details under
‘technical requirements’ below) that the written part of the assignment must address. This
assignment requires you to conduct a financial analysis of a publicly listed company. You are
required to pick ONE of the Australian listed companies below. More information about
the company can be accessed via the following link
Link: https://www.listcorp.com/asx
1. Westpac Banking Corp (ASX:WBC)
2. Medibank Private Limited (ASX:MPL)
3. BHP Group Limited (ASX:BHP)
4. Macquarie Technology Group Limited (ASX:MAQ)full guarantee of passing assignments
please contact us: 096603 02624 or email us: [email protected]

Australian Stock Exchange (ASX) Listed Companies - Listcorp A list of the 2253 listed companies on the Australian Stock Exchange (ASX) with market cap, share price, sector information, latest news and more.