UP Tet Uttirna Sangharsh Morcha

बी आर सी पर मौलिक नियुक्ति, परीक्षा, शेष मानदेय के लिए बेसिक शिक्षा अधिकारी को संबोधित ज्ञापन देते हुए।

उ.प्र. में हाइकोर्ट की फुल बेंच ने किया शिक्षामित्रों का समायोजन निरस्त।

भाइयों, बड़े दुःख के साथ सूचित करना पड़ रहा है कि कि आज सुबह हमारे महाराजगंज जनपद के परतावल बी आर सी की प्रशिक्षु शिक्षिका गीता चौधरी का गोरखपुर बस स्टेशन पर बी आर सी जाते समय एक्सीडेंट हो गया है। लखनऊ स्थित सहारा हॉस्पिटल ले जाते समय बस्ती के पास उनका स्वर्गवास हो गया। ईश्वर उनकी आत्मा को शांति उनके परिवार को शक्ति प्रदान करें।

ट्रेनिंग हेतु शासनादेश जारी तथा सभी ग्राम पंचायत केंद्रों को या इनकी अनुपस्थिति में जूनियर/प्राथमिक विद्यालयों को NOFN के अंतर्गत ब्रॉडबैंड से जोड़े जाने का निर्देश।

17-04-2015 को रहेगा सार्वजनिक अवकाश।

Lo bhaiyon, aakhir intezar khatm hua. New Year me Niyukti patra le lo. Happy New Year 2015.

72,825 शिक्षक भर्तीः जमकर हो रही मनमानी
एससीईआरटी के निदेशक सर्वेंद्र विक्रम सिंह का कहना है कि डायटों से 45 फीसदी अंक वालों को वापस करने की जानकारी उन्हें भी मिली है।

शासनादेश में यदि 45 फीसदी अंक वालों को पात्र माना गया है तो उन्हें भी काउंसलिंग में शामिल होने का मौका दिया जाएगा।
कहा कि यदि पहले चरण में ऐसे आवेदक काउंसलिंग से वंचित रह जाते हैं, तो उन्हें दूसरे चरण की काउंसलिंग में शामिल होने का मौका मिलेगा।

उन्होंने यह भी स्पष्ट किया कि इस संबंध में सोमवार को अधिकारियों से बात की जाएगी

Read more: http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com/2014/08/uptet-72825.html

Gyanesh Dev
fresh interim order..Court No. - 38
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 65811 of 2012
Petitioner :- Ashish Mishra
Respondent :- State Of U.P.& Others
Petitioner Counsel :- Siddharth Khare,Ashok Khare
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Kumar Singh
Hon'ble Arun Tandon,J.
Connect with Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 39674 of 2012 and
Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 65444 of 2012.
Learned Standing Counsel prays for and is granted time
upto 9th January, 2012 to file counter affidavit.
One of the contention raised on behalf of the petitioner is
that the fixation of minimum and outer age limit under the
fresh advertisement will render certain candidates, who were
earlier eligible and who had applied in pursuance to the
advertisement published on 30th November, 2011 stand
disqualified.
It is stated that the State Government on its own had
dropped the selection proceedings in terms of the
advertisement dated 30th November, 2011.
It is further pointed out that under Rule-6, insofar as it
pertains to trainee teachers, the power to determine the
upper age limit only has been conferred upon the State
Government. The determination of the minimum age at 21
years and 40 years as on 1st July, 2012 is illegal. Lastly, it is
submitted that under fresh advertisement, every candidate
is now required to furnish bank draft for a sum of 500/- for
each district qua which he makes the application. Meaning
thereby that if a person applies for all 75 districts, he will be
required to pay to the State Government a total sum of Rs.
37,500/-.
According to the petitioner,earlier the State Government
had charged a fee of Rs.500/- for applying in any number
of districts. It is their case that the fixation of fee at Rs. 500/-
per district is arbitrary and exorbitant especially, having
regard to the fact that the petitioners are unemployed
educated youth. It is their case that the State Government
cannot be permitted to make a profit out of this fee to be
collected, at best it can recover the amount, which is spent
for evaluating the applications and computation of the merit.
It is has been pointed out to the Court that last date for
submission of application in pursuance to the fresh
advertisement is 31st December, 2012. The applications are
to be made online. Therefore, unless the conditions
prescribed are satisfied, online applications shall be
rejected.
The Court is to close for winter vacations tomorrowand it is
not possible to adjudicate upon all the issues raised, in
absence of a counter affidavit being filed by the State
Government.
Some interim arrangementis therefore required to be made.
For the purpose, Sri Neeraj Upadhayaya, learned
Additional Chief Standing Counsel may obtain instruction
from the State by tomorrow i.e. 21st December, 2012.
Put up this matter tomorrow i.e. 21st December, 2012.
(Arun Tandon, J.)
Order Date :- 20.12.2012

Alok Yadavji se


Lo bhai court se lautne k baad ki update courtk
ander tha es wajah se kucch likh nhi paaya auf
uper se stress ab thoda fresh hu.....1- tondon
1981 ki niyamavali ka hawaala dete hue weightege
k favour me bilkul nhi unhone vakeel se kaha k jab
neeymavali k tahat add hai to aap kyun baar baar
weightege ki baat karte hue ek hi mudde pe aa rhe
hai..
2-vakeel k a kehne par k log court me phanse pade
hai esliye form nhi bhar paa rhe hai so date extend
ki jaai phir tondon ne kha form bhariye kya dikkat
hai to vakeel ne kha skr fees bhi jyada hai toh
tondon ji ne tapaak se kha THIK HAI FEES KAM
KARVA DENGE...at last overage ki baat aayi toh
judge saab ne kaha apni a baatein likhkar dijiye
hum consider karke aage ki sunvaai kal karte hain
aur turant kursi chhod di ....doston jahan tak main
sun samajh paaya yhi sab hua kyunki had se jyaDa
bheed thi..

lko me lanbi bahas ke bad v sirf sarkar se counter manga gaya aur alld me kal ki date

Court No. - 7
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 76039 of 2011
Petitioner :- Yadav Kapildev Lal Bahadur
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others
Petitioner Counsel :- Alok Kumar Yadav,Rajesh Yadav
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,K.S. Kushwaha
Hon'ble Arun Tandon,J.
The matter has been heard at some length by this Court, an
affidavit has been filed on behalf of Secretary (Basic Education),
Government of Uttar Pradesh today in the Court, wherein it has
been stated that the fairness of Teachers' Eligibility Test (T.E.T.) is
under examination before the State Government. For the purpose,
a High Level Committee has been constituted. The
recommendation of High Level Committee is awaited. Reference
has also been made to the pending petitions in respect of the T.E.T.
examination as well as to the special appeals filed by B.T.C.
qualified candidates for appointment irrespective of the T.E.T.
examination.
Sri C.B. Yadav, learned Additional Advocate General states that
the matter is under active consideration of the State Government
and a decision shall be taken without unnecessary delay.
This Court may only record that the appointment on the post of
Assistant Teacher in Parishidiya Vidyalaya is squarely dependent
upon the decision the State Government will take on the fairness or
otherwise of the T.E.T. examination. The number of posts lying
vacant is in the thousands. i
The final decision must be taken promptly. Therefore, this Court
directs that the State Government shall take final decision in
respect of fairness or otherwise of the T.E.T. examination and all
such related issue as it may so desire preferably within four (4)
weeks from today. The decision of the State Government shall be
brought on record by means of an affidavit of the Secretary
himself on or before 06th August, 2012. It is made clear that
request for grant of further time for the purpose shall not be
appreciated by the Court.
List on 06th August 2012.
Interim order, if any, shall continue till the next date of listing.
Order Date :- 5.7.2012
N.S.Rathour