20/08/2026
On August 10, it was reported that understandings had been reached to remove nuclear material from “Site 99” in Syria. Eight days later, Syria and the IAEA announced that the material declared by Damascus would remain in Syrian custody under international safeguards.
It has not yet been clarified whether the reports refer to the same site and the same stockpile.
According to reports, the material is linked to the Assad regime’s clandestine al-Kibar nuclear program and likely includes uranium in the form of yellowcake. It is not suitable for direct use in a nuclear weapon, but in hostile hands, it could be used for smuggling, extortion, or radiological terrorism.
Several actors must be considered in this context: Iran, ISIS, criminal elements, and even potential “rogue” actors within the forces of the al-Sharaa regime. A future scenario in which the regime itself adopts a more radical course, restricts oversight, or attempts to use the material as political and security leverage must also be considered.
Cooperation with the IAEA is a positive step, but the agency does not secure the sites. Responsibility remains in the hands of a state that is still unstable.
Read the full article>>
On August 10, it was reported that the United States had reached understandings with Syria and Israel under which the International