Morrison Hall, HKU

Morrison Hall, HKU

Share

http://www.morrison.hku.hk/ "Deo Adjuvante Labor Proficit"
God helps those who work together to progress.

Photos from Morrison Hall, HKU's post 25/05/2020

[Please scroll down for English version]
《共匪暴政亂世少恥廉 義士戮力而赴誓不休》
香港大學學生會聯舍宿生會/學生會及香港大學康寧堂學生會就設立香港國家安全法之聲明

《基本法》、《中英聯合聲明》清楚訂明香港應享有高度自治,立法權及獨立的司法權,以及各項如:集會、言論、結社等自由。然而,自去年反修例運動開始,港人的權利及自由一再受到踐踏,港共政權對港人的壓迫從未停止。重提就《基本法》第二十三條立法,其醜惡用心昭然若揭。共匪近日以不同手段對港人步步進逼:就文憑試歷史科試題大作文章,令其爪牙染指教育,圖箝制思想;於武漢肺炎疫情導致民不聊生之際,令其鷹犬於立法會內會篡取主席之位,務求使國歌法能通過二讀,向中共政權獻媚,製造白色恐怖。然而,共匪狼子野心不息,於五月二十二日開始的全國人民代表大會第三次會議上審議《全國人民代表大會關於建立健全香港特別行政區維護國家安全的法律制度和執行機制的決定(草案)》的議案(下稱《國安法》)。視基本法憲制責任如無物,擴展極權統治,限制港人自由,意圖令社會噤若寒蟬。

根據《基本法》第十八條,列於附件三之法律,由香港特別行政區在當地公佈或立法實施,而僅限於有關國防、外交和其他按《基本法》規定不屬於香港特區自治範圍的法律。然而,是次共匪針對香港單獨立法,繞過本地立法程序,明目張膽搶奪香港的立法權。所謂《國安法》,不過是痴人說夢、自欺欺人,將香港推向「一國一制」深淵的惡法。面對港人在過往一年的抗爭,向國際展示香港人爭取自由民主的決心,共匪惶惶不可終日,深恐人民終將推翻暴政。多年而來,港共政權都試圖就《基本法》二十三條立法,但港人盡皆以行動反抗政權。是次惡法訂明制止「任何分裂國家、顛覆國家政權、組織實施恐怖活動及外國和境外勢力干預香港特別行政區事務的活動」,與《基本法》第二十三條的目的明顯重疊,共匪險惡用意不言而喻。妄想通過此惡法,令港人噤聲,重掌大權。

面對共匪此等不義暴政,英、美,以致歐盟皆發表聲明指責中共政府違反《中英聯合聲明》,踐踏一國兩制。美國更明言,一但共匪強推惡法,將會重新評估香港的特殊地位。共匪之舉,世人皆對其口誅筆伐,但其爪牙仍一意孤行,堅稱立法能保香港社會穩定,意圖粉飾太平。而港共政權尸位素餐,對中共政權侵害一國兩制視若無睹,與中共沆瀣一氣,背棄港人,恬不知恥。香港大學學生會聯舍宿生會/學生會及香港大學康寧堂學生會在此予以強烈譴責。

共匪自以為他們的所作所為,能使我城人民歸順投降。然而,這一切不過是共匪一廂情願,錯判事實。經歷一年抗爭,義士拋頭顱、灑熱血,我城人民信念之強大,決非共匪此等厚顏無恥、宵小之徒所能動搖。

縱使未來革命之路定必崎嶇難行,我城人民定當戮力同心,上下求索,抱持「光復香港」志向,決不向暴政低頭,誓要與其抗爭到底。風雨飄搖,兄弟爬山,或會選取不同路線踽踽獨行。但只要眾人皆有著同一目標,守望相助,黑夜終會過去,民主自由的黎明總會到來。

我等皆為與眾人並肩的香港兒女,我們將堅守信念,與港共政權奮鬥到底,誓不罷休。

一息尚存,抗爭到底。
五大訴求,缺一不可。
光復香港,時代革命。

簽署

香港大學康寧堂學生會
香港大學學生會何東夫人紀念堂宿生會
香港大學學生會李志雄紀念堂學生會
香港大學學生會利希慎堂學生會
香港大學學生會李兆基堂宿生會
香港大學學生會馬禮遜堂宿生會
香港大學學生會利銘澤堂宿生會
香港大學學生會利瑪竇宿舍宿生會
香港大學學生會李國賢堂學生會
香港大學學生會聖約翰學院學生會
香港大學學生會施德堂學生會
香港大學學生會孫志新堂宿生會
香港大學學生會太古堂宿生會
香港大學學生會大學堂宿生會
香港大學學生會偉倫堂學生會

二零二零年五月二十四日

“Against the Tyranny: Together We Stand and Onwards We Fight”
Joint Statement by the Hall/College Students' Associations of HKUSU and Hornell Hall Students' Association, HKU

In response to the Hong Kong National Security Bill
The Basic Law and the Sino-British Joint Declaration pledged unequivocally that Hong Kong is entitled to a high degree of autonomy, legislative power and an independent judiciary; amongst other rights that Hongkongers are entitled such as the freedom of speech and of assembly. Since the Anti-Extradition Bill Movement last year, it is evident that our rights and freedoms are being eroded by the continuous crackdowns from the authoritarian and infamous Hong Kong government. The corrupt ulterior motive behind the reintroduction of the implementation bill of Article 23 of the Basic Law is abundant enough to see. The Government has been pushing the boundaries of what us, as Hongkongers, understand as our rights and freedoms. For instance, the HKDSE History paper controversy is exemplary of the Government’s encroachment on our education system to clamp down on the freedom of thought and brainwash our future generation. Against the backdrop of the dire societal situation caused by the Wuhan Coronavirus pandemic, the regime instigated a coup d’etat of the chairmanship in the Legislative Council House Committee with the sole purpose of passing the draconian National Anthem Bill despite fierce opposition from Hongkongers. Nevertheless, the regime has yet to cease its oppression to achieve its wild ambition for power. The National Security Law for Hong Kong, to be examined during the third meeting of the National People’s Congress starting from 22 May 2020, undermines the rule of law in Hong Kong, tightens Beijing’s control over Hong Kong and imposes a white terror on the liberty of fellow Hongkongers.

According to Article 18 of the Basic law, any law listed to be implemented through Annex III should be confined to those related to defence and foreign affairs as well as other matters outside the limits of the autonomy of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region as specified by the Law. However, the authoritarian Chinese regime chose to bypass the Legislative Council and forcefully implement the National Security Law for Hong Kong, a flagrant intrusion into Hong Kong’s high degree of autonomy, in particular, legislative autonomy. Any façade that the regime puts up does not take away from the fact that this draconian Act is the last straw Hong Kong in the abyss of “One Country, One System”. Over the past year, Hongkongers have demonstrated our utmost determination in fighting for freedom and democracy whatever the cost may be. The authoritarian regime is in a constant state of anxiety that one day Hongkongers will successfully overthrow their rule. As a result, the regime has repeatedly brought back Article 23 legislation, failing to the determination of Hongkongers to fight back. The current National Security Law for Hong Kong has a high degree of similarity with Article 23, which enacts laws to prohibit any act of treason, secession, sedition, and subversion against the Central People’s Government, or theft of state secrets, and to prohibit foreign political organizations or bodies from conducting political activities in the Region. The regime’s perilous intention to tighten its control over Hong Kong by silencing the voice of Hongkongers cannot be hidden away under sheep’s clothing.

Against the tyranny of the Chinese government, the governments of the United States, the United Kingdom and the European Union have issued statements accusing the Chinese government of their blatant violation and disregard of the Sino-British Joint Declaration and destruction of ‘One Country, Two Systems’. The United States went further to consider a reassessment of Hong Kong’s special international position should the National Security Law for Hong Kong be passed. Despite the international condemnation, the Chinese government continues to push for the passage of the National Security Law, dressing it up as a law that ensures social stability in Hong Kong, while avoiding accusations of the illegitimacy behind the National Security Law. Upon this critical moment, the Hong Kong government, as vassalage of the Chinese regime, betrayed Hongkongers and took part in dismantling Hong Kong’s high degree of autonomy and uprooting ‘One Country, Two Systems’. The Hall/College Students’ Association of the Hong Kong University Students’ Union and Hornell Hall Students’ Association of The University of Hong Kong strongly condemns the Hong Kong government for its blatant abandonment of Hongkongers in this critical moment of life-or-death for Hong Kong.

The Chinese regime assumed that their oppression could silence Hongkongers into submission. Unfortunately for them, they have misread the reality of the situation. After a year of resisting against the brutality of the Hong Kong government, our determination has never been stronger and our hearts have never been more passionate to fight for our freedom. The Chinese regime and the Hong Kong government can never kill us all.

Although the road to freedom is tough and will bring more bloodshed. We, as Hongkongers, stand united with our valour and wisdom in the countless battles ahead against tyranny. We, as Hongkongers, never surrender as it is better to die on our feet than to live on our knees against the authoritarian regime. We, as Hongkongers, will continue our fight for freedom and democracy whatever the cost may be. In this raging storm, we are brothers and sisters regardless of the separate roads we decide to take. As long as our hearts and minds stay united, even the darkest night will pass, and the dawn of liberation and glory for Hong Kong will arrive.

Regardless of our differences, we are, first and foremost, freedom-loving Hongkongers. We are on the frontlines of the battle for our freedom, we pledge our utmost faith and determination to march onward with the revolution. Glory be to thee, Hong Kong.
Je me révolte, donc nous sommes.

Five Demands, Not One Less.
Liberate Hong Kong, the Revolution of Our Times.

Signatories

Hornell Hall Students’ Association, The University of Hong Kong
Lady Ho Tung Hall Students’ Association, H.K.U.S.U.
Lee Chi Hung Hall Students’ Association, H.K.U.S.U.
Lee Hysan Hall Students’ Association, H.K.U.S.U.
Lee Shau Kee Hall Students’ Association, H.K.U.S.U.
Morrison Hall Students’ Association, H.K.U.S.U.
R. C. Lee Hall Students’ Association, H.K.U.S.U.
Ricci Hall Students’ Association, H.K.U.S.U.
Simon K. Y. Lee Hall Students’ Association, H.K.U.S.U.
St. John’s College Students’ Association, H.K.U.S.U.
Starr Hall Students’ Association, H.K.U.S.U.
Suen Chi Sun Hall Students’ Association, H.K.U.S.U.
Swire Hall Students’ Association, H.K.U.S.U.
University Hall Students’ Association, H.K.U.S.U.
Wei Lun Hall Students’ Association, H.K.U.S.U

24th May 2020

Photos from Morrison Hall, HKU's post 07/06/2019

[Please scroll down for English version]

《異議群起抵修例 督請港府察民憤》
香港大學學生會聯舍宿生會/學生會就《逃犯條例》草案修訂之聲明

「守護人權」、「公平審訊」是國際間高舉的普世價值,亦是香港一直賴以成功的管治原則。根據一九八四年所簽訂的《中英聯合聲明》,香港在「一國兩制」下應廣獲民主自由,而其更成為香港社會高舉、珍重、擁護的核心價值。近日修例草案卻反其道而行,嚴重威脅香港境內人士之人身安全及自由。本著對自由與公義的堅持,我等欲述修訂《逃犯條例》草案於香港之威脅,並強烈要求香港政府立即撤回草案。

首先,倘若草案獲通過,香港政府能以單次個案形式把逃犯移交至其他未與香港簽訂長期移交協定的司法管轄區受審,當中包括司法及刑罰制度飽受質疑、缺乏人權保障及司法獨立的中國內地。

《香港基本法》第28條:
「香港居民的人身自由不受侵犯。

香港居民不受任意或非法逮捕、拘留、監禁。禁止任意或非法搜查居民的身體、剝奪或限制居民的人身自由。禁止對居民施行酷刑、任意或非法剝奪居民的生命。」

聯合國人權組織「禁止酷刑委員會」及「消除對婦女歧視委員會」均指出中央政府過去曾多次侵犯人權,故將嫌疑犯或罪犯引渡到中國,將嚴重威脅其人身安全及自由,無疑違反了《香港基本法》對港人人身自由之保障。是次修例草案不僅嚴重影響香港居民,更會威脅香港的國際地位。一旦通過修例,市民和在港外國人或會面臨風險,有機會被引渡到有欠健全司法及刑事制度的國家。此後,香港在國際舞台上將不再象徵安全與穩定。可惜現時港府一直對公眾的質疑和憂慮視若無睹,決意修例,威脅人權。

其次,修例對香港影響甚廣,惟港府僅以二十日作草草諮詢,我等對此予以強烈譴責。是次修例並無遵從《香港法例之草擬及制定過程》,繞過立法會法案委員會審議,直接向立法會大會提交修例草案,意圖倉促通過法案。此舉不但有違程序公義,更揭示政府漠視民意,對本地法律及其他專業界別的各種建議,以至對國際反對聲音置若罔聞。因此,我等對港府上述行爲予以強烈譴責,同時亦對我城水深火熱現況感到深切遺憾。

再者,是次修例可謂已喪失基礎。就陳同佳於台灣殺人一案,台灣大陸委員會已多次明確表示不會要求引渡謀殺嫌疑人,亦憂修例後會令在港或赴港台灣人面臨隨時被移送往內地之威脅。即使草案獲得通過,港府亦無法彰顯在此案中其所謂的「公義」,亦即移交陳到台灣面臨審訊。可見,是次修例的基礎已經蕩然無存。鑑於修正案的漏洞顯而易見,現時的建議絕不應在立法會通過。

民間亦有就其他引渡方法作出深入討論,我等在此促請港府納入考慮。香港政府可聯同台灣當局簽定引渡協議;若謀殺罪嫌疑犯或罪犯為香港居民或通常居住在香港,政府亦可修改法律,使謀殺案件具有域外管轄權。目前,只要被告或其子女與香港有聯繫,在境外對兒童所犯的性罪行,香港擁有刑事司法管轄權。這先例或適用於解決引渡問題的謀殺案件。不過,姑勿論民間替代解決方案能否實施,港府均須撤回是次修例,方能避免香港政局不穩,釋除民眾憂慮。

香港政府以堵塞法律漏洞為名,打壓異己搭橋鋪路為實,政治動機路人皆見。為了香港未來,香港大學學生會聯舍宿生會/學生會定必團結一致,挺身為公義發聲,奮力重燃大衆守護香港的決心。本著對自由公義、公平審訊的堅持,我等重申港府不應向中央政府移交嫌疑犯或罪犯,並再次強烈要求香港政府撤回修訂《逃犯條例》草案。

簽署

香港大學學生會康寧堂學生會
香港大學學生會何東夫人紀念堂宿生會
香港大學學生會李志雄紀念堂學生會
香港大學學生會利希慎堂學生會
香港大學學生會李兆基堂宿生會
香港大學學生會馬禮遜堂宿生會
香港大學學生會利銘澤堂宿生會
香港大學學生會利瑪竇宿舍宿生會
香港大學學生會李國賢堂學生會
香港大學學生會聖約翰學院學生會
香港大學學生會施德堂學生會
香港大學學生會孫志新堂宿生會
香港大學學生會太古堂宿生會
香港大學學生會大學堂宿生會
香港大學學生會偉倫堂學生會

二零一九年六月七日

Joint Statement by Hall/College Students’ Associations of HKUSU
In Regards to the Amendment Bill of Fugitive Offenders Ordinance

We, the Hall/College Students’ Associations of the Hong Kong University Students’ Union, hereby demand the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) to halt the amendment of the Fugitive Offenders Ordinance (FOO). Based on our respect for conscience and justice, we are manifesting our thoughts and beliefs in regards to the Amendment Bill of FOO. Our actions are based on the international advocacy of human rights, hence no one or nothing shall prevent us from acting upon what we believe is to be just and fair.

By the Sino-British Joint Declaration of 1984, Hong Kong has been given extensive democracy under “One Country, Two Systems.” As liberty is always celebrated in Hong Kong society, Hongkongers truly cherish the values of freedom and believe that the Government of HKSAR, with the obligation to represent the people, has to safeguard the rights and freedoms of Hong Kong residents. However, given that the recent actions by the Chief Executive Carrie Lam and her government are clearly against the will of the people, the Joint Hall/College Students’ Associations expresses its deepest regret to the situation of Hong Kong.

There are fundamental flaws within this proposed amendment bill that cannot be overseen. The background that led to the introduction of this amended bill was because of the murder case in Taiwan committed by a Hongkonger. While the complications in extradition process between Hong Kong and Taiwan led to the introduction of this amendment bill, the Taiwanese government has repeatedly made it clear that they will not seek extradition of the murder suspect since, to quote, “HKSAR’s extradition law puts its people at risk of being snatched by China.” If the country that requested for a solution believes that the proposal greatly threatens the welfare of people to the degree of cancelling the request for extradition, by the rational sense, it is right for the Lam Administration to withdraw this unreasonable amendment.

Along with this, the judicial credibility and transparency of the People’s Republic of China are very questionable. In the Universal Human Rights Index of United Nations Human Rights, concerns and observations from Committee against Torture show numerous violations on human rights committed by the Chinese government. Extraditing a suspect or a criminal to China may severely threaten one’s safety or deprive his or her freedom, which is deemed illegal by Article 28 of Hong Kong Basic Law:

“The freedom of the person of Hong Kong residents shall be inviolable.

No Hong Kong resident shall be subjected to arbitrary or unlawful arrest, detention or imprisonment. Arbitrary or unlawful search of the body of any resident or deprivation or restriction of the freedom of the person shall be prohibited. Torture of any resident or unlawful deprivation of the law of any resident shall be prohibited.”

If the strong distrust against Chinese judicial procedures, which is a product of human rights abuses by the Central People’s Government, is not resolved, HKSAR must not send suspects or criminals to Mainland China to ensure fair, transparent trials for everyone. Along with this, Amendment Bill of FOO is an unjust amendment that will affect everyone residing in Hong Kong, and it is likely to threaten internationalization, which is one of the distinctive characteristics Hong Kong possesses within Asia, as it imposes Hong Kong with an atmosphere of uncertainty and unsafety. Based on what the people see right now, the Government of the HKSAR has been turning a blind eye to public concerns over the amendment of the FOO. The amendment poses a huge threat to human rights, as Hongkongers and travellers to Hong Kong would face a high chance of being extradited to countries without a sound judicial and criminal system.

The Joint Hall/College Students’ Associations also reprimand the lack of preparation by the Lam Administration in regards to FOO amendment. Considering the possible consequences of the amendment and the contemporary situation, the gravity of the proposal cannot be ignored. For this, a thorough consultation regarding the FOO amendment must be done. However, only 20 days were given for public consultation, which is definitively insufficient time for the people to have a full understanding and voice out their opinions.

Hong Kong’s legislation procedure - first a preliminary debate, then a detailed examination in a bills committee, and finally voting - has not been kept as the HKSAR government decided to fast-track the bill. Of course, the fault also goes to the Pro-Democracy and Pro-Beijing factions for hindering discussions within the bills committee, but such incident should not be the excuse for the government to utilize its executive powers. If HKSAR government truly cares for the people’s safety in regards to extradition, then it would be right for the government to thoroughly explain its intentions without abstract points and provide more time for the public to have a full understanding. For now, the decision by the Government of HKSAR seems rash and caused unnecessary political chaos.

Given that the flaws of the amendment are so vividly clear, the current proposal must not be passed in the Legislative Council. If the situation of extradition between Taiwan and HKSAR is so grave, then removing Taiwan from the list of non-extraditable countries can be a remedy to the situation. Alternatively, the law can be amended to make the case of murder subject to extra-territorial jurisdiction if the murder suspect or the perpetrator is a Hong Kong resident or ordinarily resides in Hong Kong. Currently, Hong Kong has criminal jurisdiction in regards to sexual offences committed on children outside of Hong Kong if the defendant or the child has connections to Hong Kong. This precedent can be applied to cases of murder to solve the extradition problem. If these alternate solutions cannot be implemented, then the exaggerated proposal must be withdrawn, as it possesses a great possibility of triggering instability and uncertainty within HKSAR.

If the HKSAR government is truly concerned about the people’s will and their welfare, it would only be proven by withdrawing the prejudicial amendment bill and providing an alternative that satisfies all the parties involved. It is visible that HKSAR is creating more loopholes by manifesting its preferential treatment for those in power. For the prosperity of Hong Kong, the Hall/College Students’ Associations of the Hong Kong University Students’ Union act in unison. We continue with determination that our initiation will surely lead to success and once more manifest the will of the people. With the spirit of unity and conscience, we once more demand the HKSAR government to withdraw the Amendment Bill of FOO.

Signatories

Hornell Hall Students' Association, H.K.U.S.U.
Lady Ho Tung Hall Students’ Association, H.K.U.S.U.
Lee Chi Hung Hall Students’ Association, H.K.U.S.U.
Lee Hysan Hall Students’ Association, H.K.U.S.U.
Lee Shau Kee Hall Students’ Association, H.K.U.S.U.
Morrison Hall Students’ Association, H.K.U.S.U.
R. C. Lee Hall Students’ Association, H.K.U.S.U.
Ricci Hall Students’ Association, H.K.U.S.U.
Simon K. Y. Lee Hall Students’ Association, H.K.U.S.U.
St. John’s College Students’ Association, H.K.U.S.U.
Starr Hall Students’ Association, H.K.U.S.U.
Suen Chi Sun Hall Students’ Association, H.K.U.S.U.
Swire Hall Students’ Association, H.K.U.S.U.
University Hall Students’ Association, H.K.U.S.U.
Wei Lun Hall Students’ Association, H.K.U.S.U

7th June 2019

15/12/2018

Morrison Hall co-organises with Ying Wa College a concert, "A Musical Tribute to Rev. Robert Morrison" in memory of Rev. Robert Morrison (1782 – 1834).
_____________________________________________________________

Date: 19th December 2018 (Wednesday)
Time: 7:30pm
Venue: Grand Hall, Lee Shau Kee Lecture Centre, The University of Hong Kong
Ticket price: $100/$200

You are welcome to buy tickets through the General Office of Ying Wa College at 2748 5813 during office hours.

_____________________________________________________________

Morrison Hall was first commissioned by the London Missionary Society (LMS) when a university was planned for Hong Kong in 1910. The LMS had the foresight then of building a hostel for Chinese students, which subsequently opened in 1913 and was named “Morrison Hall” to commemorate Rev. Robert Morrison, the first Protestant missionary who came to China in 1807. Earlier in 1818, Rev. Robert Morrison established Ying Wa College (formerly named Anglo-Chinese College) in Malacca, Malaysia with the aim of reciprocal cultivation of Chinese and English literature and the diffusion of Christianity. This year will, therefore, be 200 years after the establishment of Ying Wa College, and 105 years after the first opening of Morrison Hall.

This special concert will feature performances by students and alumni of Morrison Hall and Ying Wa College. For tickets, please contact Cherry at the General Office of Ying Wa College at 2748 5813, For other enquiries, please contact the office of Morrison Hall at 3604 2014 or through email [email protected].

Photos from Morrison Hall, HKU's post 03/11/2018

Come and visit us at our booth! We can’t wait to tell you more about our hall ! We have saved you a seat!

07/09/2018

Fantastic news everyone! Ignis is overjoyed to tell everyone that Morrison is now on Instagram😍😊🙏! Follow us at: morrisonhallxviii

10/08/2018

今日係第二日Registration Day啦!
我地Morrison Hall 等緊你!
有咩住hall 問題又或者想黎我地hall tour 嘅同學,
不妨到Run Run Shaw Podium 同我地堂友傾下計啦!
如果今日黎唔到嘅話,可以去 goo.gl/mtDpcD 報我地既Touch Camp,感受下我地嘅hall life 啦!

到時見!😆
---------------------------------
Registration Day 2018
Date: August 9th - 10th
Time: 09:00 - 20:00
Venue: Run Run Shaw Podium, HKU

Touch Camp 2018
Date: August 11th - 12th
Venue: Morrison Hall, 109 Pok Fu Lam Road
Fee: $280
Touch Camp Registration: goo.gl/mtDpcD
---------------------------------
Official page: www.facebook.com/hkumorrisonhall
Official Website: www.morrison.hku.hk

Morrison Hall x Hornell Hall - YES 2 08/05/2018

In Apr 2018, Morrison Hall and Hornell Hall students continued a community service project called "Youth Enrichment by Sports” (YES), a sports mentorship programme for youths from ordinary families. Around 30 HKU students and youths were paired up as teams to finish a one-day volunteer work, plus complete a challenging 8km obstacle race which resulted in tied bonding and great friendships.

08/11/2017

The Blessing farm Project is being promoted at the front page of HKU website:
https://www.hku.hk/

Its video link on HKU U-vision:
https://uvision.hku.hk/playvideo.php?mid=21376

Thank you our Warden Sydney Tang and our Site Manager Christina Lo for supporting our significant project!

Thank you all participants for joining our meaningful service.

Want your school to be the top-listed School/college in Hong Kong?

Click here to claim your Sponsored Listing.

Location

Category

Address


Morrison Hall, Jockey Club Student Village II, 109 Pok Fu Lam Road
Hong Kong

Opening Hours

Monday 09:00 - 18:00
Tuesday 09:00 - 18:00
Wednesday 09:00 - 18:00
Thursday 09:00 - 18:00