Sussex School of Philosophy & Psychology

Sussex School of Philosophy & Psychology Tutoring service for A' Level Psychology and A' Level Philosophy/RS. Examiner and teacher at renown

22/02/2017

After marking Year 12 mocks, wondering if you need a gentle reminder as to Aquinas' Five Ways...

St. Thomas Aquinas:
The Existence of God can be proved in five ways.
Argument Analysis of the Five Ways


The First Way: Argument from Motion

Our senses prove that some things are in motion.

Things move when potential motion becomes actual motion.

Only an actual motion can convert a potential motion into an actual motion.

Nothing can be at once in both actuality and potentiality in the same respect (i.e., if both actual and potential, it is actual in one respect and potential in another).

Therefore nothing can move itself.

Therefore each thing in motion is moved by something else.

The sequence of motion cannot extend ad infinitum.

Therefore it is necessary to arrive at a first mover, put in motion by no other; and this everyone understands to be God.

The Second Way: Argument from Efficient Causes

We perceive a series of efficient causes of things in the world.

Nothing exists prior to itself.

Therefore nothing [in the world of things we perceive] is the efficient cause of itself.

If a previous efficient cause does not exist, neither does the thing that results (the effect).

Therefore if the first thing in a series does not exist, nothing in the series exists.

If the series of efficient causes extends ad infinitum into the past, for then there would be no things existing now.

That is plainly false (i.e., there are things existing now that came about through efficient causes).

Therefore efficient causes do not extend ad infinitum into the past.

Therefore it is necessary to admit a first efficient cause, to which everyone gives the name of God.

The Third Way: Argument from Possibility and Necessity (Reductio argument)

We find in nature things that are possible to be and not to be, that come into being and go out of being i.e., contingent beings.

Assume that every being is a contingent being.

For each contingent being, there is a time it does not exist.

Therefore it is impossible for these always to exist.

Therefore there could have been a time when no things existed.

Therefore at that time there would have been nothing to bring the currently existing contingent beings into existence.

Therefore, nothing would be in existence now.

We have reached an absurd result from assuming that every being is a contingent being.

Therefore not every being is a contingent being.

Therefore some being exists of its own necessity, and does not receive its existence from another being, but rather causes them. This all men speak of as God.

The Fourth Way: Argument from Gradation of Being

There is a gradation to be found in things: some are better or worse than others.

Predications of degree require reference to the “uttermost” case (e.g., a thing is said to be hotter according as it more nearly resembles that which is hottest).

The maximum in any genus is the cause of all in that genus.

Therefore there must also be something which is to all beings the cause of their being, goodness, and every other perfection; and this we call God.

The Fifth Way: Argument from Design

We see that natural bodies work toward some goal, and do not do so by chance.

Most natural things lack knowledge.

But as an arrow reaches its target because it is directed by an archer, what lacks intelligence achieves goals by being directed by something intelligence.
Therefore some intelligent being exists by whom all natural things are directed to their end; and this being we call God.

21/02/2017

Skype lessons now available.

Sexual Metaphysics: OCR syllabus Year 13Natural law according to Aquinas claims that we should look to the natural order...
20/02/2017

Sexual Metaphysics: OCR syllabus Year 13

Natural law according to Aquinas claims that we should look to the natural order, i.e. the lower animals to see how we should behave sexually. Since animals are not homosexual (he thought), this is clearly an unethical and unnatural stance.
Counter argument: NAGEL. What separates us from animals is our psychology. Our ability to see the other as a distinct person with whom we can share sexual affection is what makes any loving act ethical, homosexual or otherwise.

20/02/2017

If you're looking for specialist A level tutoring in Psychology or Philosophy in the East Sussex area, I'm setting up a new tutoring base having moved here from London. I am a teacher in an outstanding grammar school and was also a teacher in London in a school with a world class ranking. I have a 1st class degree and am an examiner. Students often get overwhelmed with the syllabus and cutting straight to the chase and knowing what you need and what you can afford to skip is invaluable. I coach exam training and can give exemplar materials. I can go at any pace and will always put the well-being of a student first. No pressure, just help. Please call me for a trial lesson.

Address

Saint Leonards
TN380TJ

Telephone

07736 706191

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Sussex School of Philosophy & Psychology posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Shortcuts

Share

Category