24/01/2023
With 12.75 billion search results on Google, is clearly an important topic globally. Yet 95% of the information on teams, teamworking, team roles, and psychological "type" assessments (e.g. MBTI, Enneagram etc) are seriously out of date.
Despite all the talk about organizations, 's and other self-organizing teams and organizations, there is an empty void when it comes to understanding the core dynamics and potential of teams and organizations, and the individuals within them.
So, I've taken my four decades of experience in this field and put together a science-based approach to teams and teamworking that applies evolutionary, complexity and cognitive science approaches to human beings, their doings, and collaborations.
This is the second of two articles that provide an overview of the three key criteria by which team performance can be evaluated, along with the three core team enhancers, organized into a coherent method.
Call it metamodern or integral science, the name doesn't really matter. No one ever said it was going to be easy getting from Game A to Game B, but at least we can free ourselves from the first-tier delusions of how to develop incredible, world-shifting teams and organizations.
In my last article: “What Makes a Great Team?”, I explained teams from an evolutionary perspective, which gave us powerful insights into…