13/02/2026
🤔BT, Unfair Dismissal & the £60k Lesson for Employers
Two BT employees in Dundee were dismissed for alleged gross misconduct following comments in a Teams chat.
They took the case to an employment tribunal.
The tribunal ruled the dismissals were not within the range of reasonable responses.
Compensation awarded:
£26,395.94
£31,553.04
➡️ Nearly £60,000 in total.
Not a headline-grabbing seven-figure payout. But a clear example of how even large employers can get dismissal decisions wrong.
Here’s the key point:
Unfair dismissal cases are rarely about whether behaviour was “right” or “wrong.”
They’re about process, proportionality and reasonableness.
Tribunals ask:
>Was there a fair investigation?
>Was procedure followed?
>Was dismissal a proportionate response?
In the digital workplace, Teams chats and internal messages blur the line between informal banter and formal misconduct. Acting quickly feels decisive. But acting proportionately is what protects the organisation.
And the true cost isn’t just £60k.
It’s:
Legal fees
Management time
Reputational risk
Erosion of trust internally
Strong leadership isn’t about being soft.
It’s about being firm, fair and defensible.
Before dismissing for gross misconduct, the real question is:
Could we calmly justify this decision in front of a tribunal?
If the answer isn’t a confident yes, pause.
Because culture and compliance aren’t separate conversations.- they’re the same one.
The question for leaders is simple:
If this decision landed in tribunal tomorrow, would our process hold up?
If you're unsure, that’s not a weakness — it’s an opportunity to strengthen your foundations.
DM me if you’d like to see how MiM People helps organisations embed confident, compliant leadership.