02/09/2026
Like a lot of people, I've been really interested in Alex Honnold's free climbing feats. For me, it's been particularly around some testing which showed that his amygdala doesn't fire off in a typical way. This means he physiologically doesn't experience risk in the way that most people do.
It's led me down a rabbit hole of thoughts about how, much like a person can only be brave when they're scared, can a person only do RISKY things when they acknowledge and engage with risk?
One distinction between a risk and a hazard can be whether someone perceived it or not. If you don't know about a nail sticking out of a board, that's a hazard; once someone points out the nail, it becomes a risk, and you can choose how to navigate that risk.
As facilitators of risks, should we move more of our thinking from 'did they do something that (I thought) was risky?' and more towards 'did they do something that (THEY thought) was risky?'