Tiger Bay Fighters Club

How to do a kip up

https://music.youtube.com/watch?v=bT9rvHaOJ1Y&si=5JmFMHLxqeMJ9Cga A song for folk who are against terrorism, fundamentalist beliefs against women, hostage taking, and tyranny.

You know where you can shove your Palestine! - YouTube Music Provided to YouTube by DistroKid You know where you can shove your Palestine! · Hakol Sababa · Hakol Sababa You know where you can shove your Palestine! ℗...

https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1KYxJMKNwM/

What is kung fu?

https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1b8x8kGJQb/

Real techniques #loitrankarate

He sued her for biting off his nose after he forced a kiss on her—so the 1837 judge ruled: "She is fully entitled to bite his nose off if she so pleases. "England, December 26, 1836. The day after Christmas. Caroline Newton is at a tap-room—what we'd call a pub—with her sister. They're relaxing, having a drink, enjoying post-Christmas festivities. It's supposed to be a pleasant afternoon. Then Thomas Saverland shows up. Caroline's sister mentions, laughing, that she's left her sweetheart back in Birmingham and promised him no man would kiss her while she was away. It's casual conversation. Holiday banter. Thomas Saverland hears this and decides it's a challenge. He grabs Caroline's sister and forcibly kisses her. She's startled but tries to laugh it off—because what else can a woman do in 1836 when a man assaults her in public? Make a scene? Ruin everyone's good time? Society expects women to be good sports about these things. But Caroline Newton is not laughing. She tells Saverland clearly: she doesn't want to engage in "that kind of fun." Stop. Leave us alone. Thomas Saverland looks at Caroline—this woman who dared tell him no—and says: "If you're angry, I'll kiss you too. "Then he lunges at her. Caroline fights back. They struggle. They fall to the ground together, wrestling. They get up. Saverland goes to stand by the fire. And Caroline follows him. She confronts him. He tries to kiss her again—this man who's already assaulted her sister, who's already attacked Caroline once, who's been told explicitly to stop. Another struggle ensues. Then someone hears Saverland cry out: "She has got my nose in her mouth! "When they separate, Saverland is bleeding profusely from his face. The fleshy part of his left nostril is completely gone. Caroline spits it onto the ground. Now, you'd think this story ends here. Man assaults women, one woman defends herself violently, everyone learns a lesson about consent. But this is 1836. Women don't have the right to vote. They can't own property after marriage. They're legally subservient to men. Society expects them to endure unwanted advances with grace and good humor. So Thomas Saverland—the man who forcibly kissed two women, who ignored explicit refusals, who physically assaulted Caroline Newton—does what entitled men have done throughout history when faced with consequences for their actions. He sues her. In April 1837, the case comes before the court. Saverland stands there with the "incontestable evidence" on his face—the missing part of his nose, the disfigurement that will mark him for life. He tells his version of events: it was all in good fun, he was just playing around, it's the holiday season, she overreacted. The court hears testimony about what happened. The forced kisses. The explicit refusals. The repeated assaults. The struggle. And then the judge—Mr. Justice Patteson—delivers his ruling. "When a man kisses a woman against her will, she is fully entitled to bite his nose off if she so pleases. "Read that again. In 1837—a year when women had almost no legal rights, when marital r**e was legal, when women couldn't even testify in many courts—a British judge rules that a woman has the absolute right to violently defend herself against unwanted sexual advances. Not just the right to resist. Not just the right to say no. The right to bite a man's nose clean off his face if he forces himself on her. The ruling was published in Bell's New Weekly Messenger on April 30, 1837. It became part of legal record. It established precedent. Caroline Newton walked free. Thomas Saverland walked away disfigured, humiliated, and without compensation. Here's why this story matters 187 years later: In 1836, women were property. Fathers owned daughters until husbands owned wives. A woman's body was not her own. Consent was not a concept society recognized for women—men had rights to women's bodies through marriage, social convention, or simply by being male. Into this world, Caroline Newton said: No. And when "no" wasn't respected, she enforced it with her teeth. She didn't politely endure. She didn't laugh it off. She didn't worry about ruining the mood or making a scene or what people would think. She defended herself with whatever weapon she had available—which happened to be her jaw. And a judge—a male judge, in a male-dominated legal system, in a profoundly patriarchal society—backed her up. Think about what Judge Patteson was saying: A woman's bodily autonomy matters more than a man's comfort. A woman's explicit refusal deserves respect. And if a man ignores that refusal, whatever happens to him is his own fault. This wasn't just a ruling about one nose. It was a statement about women's right to exist in public spaces without harassment. About the legitimacy of female anger. About the consequences of male entitlement. In 2024, we're still having these conversations. We're still teaching people about consent. We're still arguing about whether women "overreact" to unwanted advances. We're still hearing "it was just a joke" and "he didn't mean anything by it" and "boys will be boys. "We're still fighting for the basic principle that a woman's "no" means no. Caroline Newton understood that in 1836.She was at a pub with her sister. A man assaulted them both. She told him to stop. He didn't. So she made him stop. Was it violent? Yes. Was it extreme? By modern standards, absolutely. But here's the thing: Caroline Newton didn't have modern options. She couldn't call the police and expect them to take her seriously. She couldn't press charges for sexual assault—that legal framework didn't exist for women like her. She couldn't rely on witnesses to intervene or society to condemn Saverland's behavior. She had her teeth. She used them. And 187 years later, Thomas Saverland is remembered as the entitled man who sued a woman for defending herself and lost. Meanwhile, Caroline Newton is remembered as the woman who literally bit back. The Bell's New Weekly Messenger documented this case because it was unusual. Women didn't sue men for assault. Men sued women for defending themselves. And courts typically sided with men. But not this time. This time, a judge looked at a disfigured man who'd forced himself on women and said: You got what you deserved. That ruling echoes through legal history. It's cited in discussions of self-defense law. It's referenced in feminist legal theory. It's celebrated as an early recognition of women's bodily autonomy. Because sometimes, history gives us exactly the heroes we need. Not the heroes who are polite and accommodating. Not the heroes who turn the other cheek. Not the heroes who worry about being "ladylike. "The heroes who bite back. Literally. Thomas Saverland vs. Caroline Newton, 1837: The case where a man learned that "no" means no, and a woman proved that sometimes the best response to unwanted advances is teeth. Caroline Newton: the woman who bit off a man's nose in self-defense and walked away vindicated. Thomas Saverland: the man whose disfigured face became permanent evidence of what happens when you don't respect women's boundaries. Judge Patteson: the judge who ruled, in 1837, that women are "fully entitled" to violently defend themselves against sexual assault. Nearly two centuries later, Caroline's message still resonates: Don't touch women without consent. If you do, don't be surprised when they defend themselves. And definitely don't expect sympathy when you face consequences. She bit his nose off. The judge said she had every right to do so. And honestly? That's exactly the kind of precedent we need more of.