25/08/2026
After attending the 34th edition of the International Association for Feminist Economics (IAFFE) conference, Eugénie Ribault (PhD student at Institute of Development Studies) was surprised to realise how little gender had featured in her formal education.
"I had studied development economics, worked on tax and public finance for several years, and considered myself familiar with questions of inequality. Yet gender had rarely featured as a central analytical lens in my economic training", she said.
The conference challenged some of her assumptions and left her with three key reflections on gender, economics and research. Read more ⬇️
I studied development economics in a traditional (or orthodox) way. Gender was not a concept I was taught. In fact, during my MA, I don’t recall gender being included among the factors we learnt about when explaining the economic and financial choices made by individuals. Nor do I remember learning how gender norms could affect macroeconomic aggregates such as tax revenues, spending allocations or even the famous “GDP”(or Gross Domestic Product). The topic that came closest to feminist economics was women’s participation in the labour market as a means of strengthening economic growth. That was it. What a disconnected perspective of the real world!
This absence of gender analysis in my training now seems striking. Economic decisions do not take place in a vacuum: they are shaped by social norms, power relations, and unequal access to resources. Feminist economics provides the tools to examine these dynamics and question assumptions that traditional economic approaches often leave unchallenged.
Participating in this conference further convinced me of the usefulness and necessity of feminist economics, as well as my desire to contribute to this field.
The full blog is available here: https://ow.ly/GJIW50ZyEsy
In early July, I participated in the 34th IAFFE conference that challenged some of my assumptions on gender, economics and research.