24/08/2026
The media are trying to make out that Andrew Tate is broke and lying because he apparently didn’t personally own his Bugatti or some of his supercars; they were leased.
But the obvious question is, who was he leasing them from?
Because Tate has openly spoken about this before. When I sat down with him, he explained that he uses overseas companies and trusts, and that assets like cars and properties can be owned through those structures while he still has access to use them.
That isn’t unusual. When you’re talking about people worth tens or hundreds of millions, assets are often held through companies, trusts and other structures, rather than everything sitting in one person’s name.
And even if we assume he was simply renting the Bugatti from a completely unrelated company, think about what that actually means.
Renting a Bugatti for a single day could cost some people close to their entire annual salary.
So using the fact that the car was leased as proof that someone is “broke” feels like the media are seriously clutching at straws, and the haters are looking for anything they can use against him.
